<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Tao Dad</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Tao Dad (@tao_dad_6e07b6dbc1fda07bd).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/tao_dad_6e07b6dbc1fda07bd</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/tao_dad_6e07b6dbc1fda07bd"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>@LazySorted - Collections that optimize themselves. How useful?</title>
      <dc:creator>Tao Dad</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tao_dad_6e07b6dbc1fda07bd/lazysorted-collections-that-optimize-themselves-how-useful-33pm</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tao_dad_6e07b6dbc1fda07bd/lazysorted-collections-that-optimize-themselves-how-useful-33pm</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I've been experimenting with a concept I call "lazy sorting" and would love some feedback.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have you had collections that might benefit from being sorted, but you don't want to pay the upfront cost or manage the complexity?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Idea&lt;br&gt;
@LazySorted - An annotation that makes collections gradually optimize themselves based on actual usage:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;java&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;@LazySorted(
    priority = Priority.HIGH,
    readCount = 10000,      
// Must be sorted by 10,000th read
    cpuThreshold = 0.3      
// Only sort when CPU &amp;lt; 30%
)
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;private List hotProducts;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The collection slowly sorts itself during idle cycles, making frequently accessed items faster to find over time&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How It Works&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Tracks access patterns behind the scenes&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Performs micro-optimizations during low-load periods&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;No big sorting spikes - gradual improvement&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Implemented as a standard List - drop-in replacement&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Use Cases I'm Thinking&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Long-running caches&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Configuration data&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Read-heavy reference data&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anywhere you'd eventually sort, but don't need it immediately&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;My Questions:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Has anyone actually needed this in production?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Is this solving a real problem or just adding complexity?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Would you use this, or just stick with occasional Collections.sort()?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;What use cases would make this actually valuable?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Appreciate your honest feedback. Many thanks!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>algorithms</category>
      <category>java</category>
      <category>discuss</category>
      <category>performance</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
