<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Jay Campbell</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Jay Campbell (@thejaycampbell).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/thejaycampbell</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/thejaycampbell"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I built a peer review platform for GitHub repos because #Trending is broken</title>
      <dc:creator>Jay Campbell</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/thejaycampbell/i-built-a-peer-review-platform-for-github-repos-because-trending-is-broken-30aa</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/thejaycampbell/i-built-a-peer-review-platform-for-github-repos-because-trending-is-broken-30aa</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a solo builder... constantly shipping new projects and features.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of the hardest parts of my process isn't the building itself, it's getting a real second opinion. Someone who actually pokes around, tests the thing, and tells you what they think from a completely different perspective.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There's no easy way to do that. You can post in a Discord, hope someone clicks, maybe get a "nice project" reply. That's not feedback. That's noise.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I built &lt;a href="https://reporanker.com" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;RepoRanker&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What it is&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
RepoRanker is a place for developers and vibe coders to submit their GitHub repos and get written peer reviews from other builders. Real feedback. 800+ character minimum. GitHub-verified reviewers so you know it's coming from an actual developer, not a bot.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Free to submit. Free to review.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The leaderboard&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
There's a daily-refreshing leaderboard so there's always something new to look at when you visit. It's not a one-time launch moment. Your repo stays discoverable over time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The economy&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
You earn credits for writing reviews. Spend those credits on visibility boosts for your own project. The more you give, the more you get back.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Try it&lt;br&gt;
Submit your repo: &lt;a href="https://reporanker.com/submit" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;reporanker.com/submit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you've ever wished someone would just sit down and actually look at what you built, this is for you.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>github</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>showdev</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
