<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: TildAlice</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by TildAlice (@tildalice).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/tildalice</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/tildalice"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>GitHub's Metered Copilot: Predictability Dies</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 21:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/githubs-metered-copilot-predictability-dies-5aj7</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/githubs-metered-copilot-predictability-dies-5aj7</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  When the Meter Runs, Trust Runs Out
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/github-copilot-is-moving-to-usage-based-billing/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;GitHub officially moved Copilot to usage-based billing on June 1, 2026&lt;/a&gt;, replacing flat subscriptions with AI Credits consumed per token. The backlash was immediate and brutal: developers &lt;a href="https://www.ghacks.net/2026/06/02/github-copilot-usage-based-billing-takes-effect-drawing-developer-backlash-over-rapid-credit-depletion/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;reported burning through a month's credits in hours&lt;/a&gt;, with one Pro+ user ($39/month) watching 8% of their 7,000-credit quota vanish in two hours of work. Another developer made a single refactoring request and burned $6. The core issue isn't the price table—it's that &lt;strong&gt;predictable consumption just died&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The new model works like this: code completions remain unlimited, but chat and agentic features now drain monthly AI Credit allotments based on token usage (input, output, cached). Pro costs $10/month with $15 in credits; Pro+ is $39 with $70; the new Max tier is $100 with $200. Business and Enterprise get pooled credits—1,900 and 3,900 per user respectively, with promotional bumps to 3,000 and 7,000 through September 1. One AI Credit equals one cent.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/github-metered-copilot-predictability/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>githubcopilot</category>
      <category>devtools</category>
      <category>pricing</category>
      <category>aicredits</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Git Stash vs Worktree: 4 Patterns for Context Switching</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 15:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/git-stash-vs-worktree-4-patterns-for-context-switching-2mlo</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/git-stash-vs-worktree-4-patterns-for-context-switching-2mlo</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Problem: Stash Breaks on Uncommitted Index State
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You're mid-refactor, three files staged, when a production bug lands in Slack. &lt;code&gt;git stash&lt;/code&gt; sounds perfect — until you discover it didn't save your staged/unstaged distinction, or worse, it mangles conflicts when you pop.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's what actually happens when you stash with mixed index state:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight python"&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;span class="c1"&gt;# File: api/middleware.py (staged)
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="k"&gt;class&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nc"&gt;AuthMiddleware&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;span class="k"&gt;def&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nf"&gt;__init__&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;self&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;app&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;):&lt;/span&gt;
        &lt;span class="n"&gt;self&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;app&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;app&lt;/span&gt;
        &lt;span class="n"&gt;self&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;rate_limiter&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="bp"&gt;None&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;span class="c1"&gt;# Half-finished feature
&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="c1"&gt;# File: api/handlers.py (unstaged, working changes)
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="k"&gt;async&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="k"&gt;def&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nf"&gt;handle_request&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;req&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;):&lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;span class="c1"&gt;# Debugging print you forgot to remove
&lt;/span&gt;    &lt;span class="nf"&gt;print&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sa"&gt;f&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="s"&gt;Request: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="si"&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;req&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;path&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="si"&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;span class="k"&gt;return&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="k"&gt;await&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nf"&gt;process&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;req&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;Run &lt;code&gt;git stash&lt;/code&gt;, fix the bug, then &lt;code&gt;git stash pop&lt;/code&gt;. Your staged changes are now unstaged. The distinction you carefully maintained — "this is ready, this isn't" — vanished.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not entirely sure why Git's default stash behavior merges staged and unstaged into one blob when &lt;code&gt;git stash --keep-index&lt;/code&gt; exists, but in practice, most developers just use &lt;code&gt;git stash&lt;/code&gt; and lose that information.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2Fstock-git-stash-vs-worktree-context-switching-1.jpg" alt="Detailed shot of fresh green leaves on a sunlit tree branch in spring." width="800" height="534"&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/git-stash-vs-worktree-context-switching/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>git</category>
      <category>gitstash</category>
      <category>gitworktree</category>
      <category>versioncontrol</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>One Hardware Wallet for 100+ Chains: My OneKey Setup</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/one-hardware-wallet-for-100-chains-my-onekey-setup-4p37</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/one-hardware-wallet-for-100-chains-my-onekey-setup-4p37</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F04%2Fonekey-classic-1s-device.jpg" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F04%2Fonekey-classic-1s-device.jpg" alt="OneKey Classic 1S hardware wallet" width="800" height="1067"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Credit-card sized, four physical buttons, a small but crisp OLED display.&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've been juggling crypto across a dozen chains for years, and the wallet fragmentation was driving me insane. Then I consolidated everything onto a single OneKey device. Here's what I learned.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Why Multi-Chain Support Actually Matters
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you're only holding Bitcoin, any hardware wallet works fine. But the moment you start exploring DeFi on Arbitrum, bridging to Solana, or picking up tokens on Avalanche, you hit a wall. Most hardware wallets were designed for a simpler era.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Trezor, for instance, supports around 20+ blockchains. That sounds decent until you realize the crypto ecosystem now spans hundreds of networks. Every new L2, every alt-L1 with interesting yields—you're constantly checking compatibility lists.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;OneKey took a different approach: support everything. Their devices handle 100+ chains and over 30,000 tokens natively. Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos chains, Polkadot parachains, the entire EVM universe—all from one seed phrase, one device.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Hardware Lineup: Which OneKey to Choose
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;OneKey offers three main hardware options, each targeting different users:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="table-wrapper-paragraph"&gt;&lt;table&gt;
&lt;thead&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Model&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Price&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Key Features&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;th&gt;Best For&lt;/th&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/thead&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/div&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/onekey-hardware-wallet-multi-chain-setup-guide/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>hardwarewallet</category>
      <category>onekey</category>
      <category>cryptosecurity</category>
      <category>multichain</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SpaceX's $75B IPO: The AI Bet Hidden in the Rocket</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 21:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/spacexs-75b-ipo-the-ai-bet-hidden-in-the-rocket-44n</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/spacexs-75b-ipo-the-ai-bet-hidden-in-the-rocket-44n</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Real Story Isn't Starlink
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/06/12/nx-s1-5855004/stock-ai-spacex-ipo-elon-musk" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;SpaceX closed the largest IPO in history&lt;/a&gt; on June 12, raising $75 billion at $135 per share and a $1.77 trillion valuation. The stock jumped 19% on day one. Wall Street celebrated the rocket company going public. But here's what most missed: this isn't a space play anymore — it's an AI infrastructure bet dressed up in rocket fuel.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Look at where the money actually goes. According to the &lt;a href="https://www.bitmex.com/blog/spacex-ipo-guide" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;S-1 filing breakdown&lt;/a&gt;, xAI — the AI division SpaceX acquired in February 2026 — is bleeding $2.5 billion per quarter on data center buildout. That's $10 billion annually. The entire $75 billion raise? A significant chunk funds AI compute infrastructure and Starlink expansion, not rockets.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Starlink contributes 61% of revenue at $11.4 billion and runs 39% operating margins — it's the only profitable segment. Launch services brought in $3.8 billion. xAI? $3.2 billion in revenue, but operating at a massive loss. The company posted a $4.9 billion net loss in 2025 despite $18.7 billion in revenue, up 33% year-over-year.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/spacex-ipo-ai-bet-hidden-rocket/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>spacex</category>
      <category>ipo</category>
      <category>aiinfrastructure</category>
      <category>starlink</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MLflow Quickstart 2026: Track Your First Experiment in 10 Minutes</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 15:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/mlflow-quickstart-2026-track-your-first-experiment-in-10-minutes-1e76</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/mlflow-quickstart-2026-track-your-first-experiment-in-10-minutes-1e76</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  MLflow Tracking in 90 Seconds
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here's the entire workflow. Install MLflow, log a single training run, and view it in the UI:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight python"&gt;&lt;code&gt;&lt;span class="c1"&gt;# pip install mlflow==2.11.3
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="kn"&gt;import&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;mlflow&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="kn"&gt;from&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;sklearn.ensemble&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="kn"&gt;import&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;RandomForestClassifier&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="kn"&gt;from&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;sklearn.datasets&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="kn"&gt;import&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;load_iris&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="kn"&gt;from&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;sklearn.model_selection&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="kn"&gt;import&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;train_test_split&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="kn"&gt;from&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;sklearn.metrics&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="kn"&gt;import&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;accuracy_score&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span class="n"&gt;X&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;y&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nf"&gt;load_iris&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;return_X_y&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="bp"&gt;True&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span class="n"&gt;X_train&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;X_test&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;y_train&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;y_test&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nf"&gt;train_test_split&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;X&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;y&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;test_size&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="mf"&gt;0.2&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;random_state&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="mi"&gt;42&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span class="n"&gt;mlflow&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nf"&gt;set_experiment&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="s"&gt;iris-quickstart&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span class="k"&gt;with&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;mlflow&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nf"&gt;start_run&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;():&lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;span class="n"&gt;n_est&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="mi"&gt;100&lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;span class="n"&gt;max_d&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="mi"&gt;5&lt;/span&gt;

    &lt;span class="n"&gt;clf&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nc"&gt;RandomForestClassifier&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;n_estimators&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;n_est&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;max_depth&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;max_d&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;random_state&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="mi"&gt;42&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;span class="n"&gt;clf&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nf"&gt;fit&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;X_train&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;y_train&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;

    &lt;span class="n"&gt;preds&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;clf&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nf"&gt;predict&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;X_test&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;span class="n"&gt;acc&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="o"&gt;=&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="nf"&gt;accuracy_score&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;y_test&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;preds&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;

    &lt;span class="n"&gt;mlflow&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nf"&gt;log_param&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="s"&gt;n_estimators&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;n_est&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;span class="n"&gt;mlflow&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nf"&gt;log_param&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="s"&gt;max_depth&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;max_d&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;span class="n"&gt;mlflow&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nf"&gt;log_metric&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="s"&gt;accuracy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="n"&gt;acc&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;
    &lt;span class="n"&gt;mlflow&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;sklearn&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="nf"&gt;log_model&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;clf&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="s"&gt;model&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;

    &lt;span class="nf"&gt;print&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;(&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sa"&gt;f&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="s"&gt;Logged run with accuracy: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="si"&gt;{&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;acc&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="si"&gt;:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="mi"&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="n"&gt;f&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="si"&gt;}&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="sh"&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="p"&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;Run &lt;code&gt;mlflow ui&lt;/code&gt; in your terminal, open &lt;code&gt;http://localhost:5000&lt;/code&gt;, and you'll see your experiment with params, metrics, and the saved model artifact.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's it. The entire MLflow tracking API distills down to three calls: &lt;code&gt;log_param()&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;log_metric()&lt;/code&gt;, &lt;code&gt;log_model()&lt;/code&gt;. Everything else is just organization.&lt;/p&gt;







&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/mlflow-quickstart-2026-track-first-experiment/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>mlflow</category>
      <category>experimenttracking</category>
      <category>mlops</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Versailles MOU: What the US-Iran Deal Actually Achieves</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 21:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/the-versailles-mou-what-the-us-iran-deal-actually-achieves-ni1</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/the-versailles-mou-what-the-us-iran-deal-actually-achieves-ni1</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  A Two-Page Agreement After Four Months of War
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The optics were deliberately chosen: President Trump signing a peace agreement at the Palace of Versailles, echoing Woodrow Wilson's 1919 treaty that ended World War I. But strip away the historical staging, and what we actually have is a &lt;a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/06/17/nx-s1-5860782/trump-iran-agreement-g7" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;14-point memorandum of understanding&lt;/a&gt; that runs less than two pages—compared to the 159-page JCPOA it's meant to replace.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The core question isn't whether this deal is better than Obama's. It's whether it achieves anything Obama's didn't, given that we bombed Iran for nearly four months to get here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2Fstock-versailles-iran-deal-analysis-1.jpg" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2Fstock-versailles-iran-deal-analysis-1.jpg" alt="Close-up of Iranian flags waving outdoors in Washington, DC, showcasing cultural identity." width="800" height="600"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Photo by &lt;a href="https://www.pexels.com/@dmv-photojournalism-29109744" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;DMV Photojournalism&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href="https://www.pexels.com" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Pexels&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What the MOU Actually Contains
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let's be precise about what was signed. The memorandum commits Iran to:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Reopen the Strait of Hormuz (toll-free for 60 days only)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Downblend its stockpile of 60% enriched uranium under IAEA supervision&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Cease military operations, including in Lebanon&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Reaffirm it "shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons"&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/versailles-iran-deal-analysis/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>irannucleardeal</category>
      <category>trumpforeignpolicy</category>
      <category>straitofhormuz</category>
      <category>oilmarkets</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Warsh Drops the Dot Plot: What It Actually Signals</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 21:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/warsh-drops-the-dot-plot-what-it-actually-signals-39b1</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/warsh-drops-the-dot-plot-what-it-actually-signals-39b1</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Fed Chair Who Won't Tell You Where Rates Are Going
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kevin Warsh just did something no Federal Reserve chair has done in two decades: he &lt;a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/17/fed-meeting-today-live-updates.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;refused to participate in the dot plot&lt;/a&gt;, the Fed's quarterly projections of where interest rates will be in the future. At his first FOMC meeting on June 17, 2026, while &lt;a href="https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/federal-reserve-interest-rate-decision-june-17-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;nine of the 18 voting members signaled rate hikes are coming&lt;/a&gt;, Warsh abstained entirely.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This isn't a technicality. It's a statement about how the Fed should operate — and it reveals more about where monetary policy is headed than any dot would.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The conventional wisdom is that the dot plot provides transparency. Markets get a peek at what each Fed official thinks will happen, extrapolate the median, and price accordingly. But Warsh's refusal exposes what practitioners have known for years: the dot plot is fiction dressed up as forecasting. It's a quarterly ritual of guessing games that &lt;a href="https://www.kiplinger.com/news/live/fed-meeting-updates-and-commentary-june-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;the Fed itself walks back within weeks&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/warsh-drops-dot-plot-what-it-signals/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>federalreserve</category>
      <category>monetarypolicy</category>
      <category>inflation</category>
      <category>interestrates</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PySpark vs Dask vs Polars: 1TB Cloud Cost Breakdown</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/pyspark-vs-dask-vs-polars-1tb-cloud-cost-breakdown-1o8b</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/pyspark-vs-dask-vs-polars-1tb-cloud-cost-breakdown-1o8b</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The $247 Cloud Bill That Made Me Question Everything
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I ran the same 1TB data aggregation job on AWS three times — once with PySpark, once with Dask, and once with Polars. The total cloud compute cost across all three runs was $247. The speed difference was 18x. The winner wasn't what I expected.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most benchmark posts compare these frameworks on synthetic data or convenient datasets that fit in RAM. I wanted to know what happens when you're processing a real 1TB CSV dump of server logs — the kind where you're burning through EC2 credits and questioning your career choices. This isn't about which framework is "better." It's about which one costs less when you're paying by the hour.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2Fstock-pyspark-dask-polars-cloud-cost-1tb-1.jpg" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2Fstock-pyspark-dask-polars-cloud-cost-1tb-1.jpg" alt="Captivating star trails over Ankara's night sky with red light streaks." width="800" height="534"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Photo by &lt;a href="https://www.pexels.com/@alican-helik-362148343" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Alican Helik&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href="https://www.pexels.com" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Pexels&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Dataset and The Problem
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I used a 1TB anonymized server access log dataset (think nginx combined logs, but bigger). The task: compute daily active users, aggregate request counts by endpoint, and calculate 95th percentile response times per day. Standard analytics workload.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/pyspark-dask-polars-cloud-cost-1tb/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>pyspark</category>
      <category>dask</category>
      <category>polars</category>
      <category>cloudcost</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UK Social Media Ban: A 70% Failure Rate Awaits</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 21:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/uk-social-media-ban-a-70-failure-rate-awaits-39om</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/uk-social-media-ban-a-70-failure-rate-awaits-39om</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Policy That Sounds Better Than It Works
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The UK just announced the most aggressive social media restriction in Western history. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government will &lt;a href="https://www.npr.org/2026/06/15/nx-s1-5858644/britain-social-media-ban" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;ban under-16s from using TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat, Facebook, and X&lt;/a&gt;, with enforcement expected by spring 2027. The stated goal is to "give kids their childhood back."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think this is fundamentally misguided—not because protecting children online is wrong, but because the mechanism is destined to fail while creating surveillance infrastructure that affects everyone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2Fstock-uk-social-media-ban-failure-1.jpg" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2Fstock-uk-social-media-ban-failure-1.jpg" alt="A young girl with long brown hair smiles while using a smartphone indoors." width="800" height="600"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Photo by &lt;a href="https://www.pexels.com/@borishamer" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Boris Hamer&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href="https://www.pexels.com" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Pexels&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Australia Already Ran This Experiment
&lt;/h2&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/uk-social-media-ban-failure/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>socialmediaregulatio</category>
      <category>ukpolicy</category>
      <category>childsafetyonline</category>
      <category>ageverification</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>$111B Paramount-WBD Merger: The Streaming Bundle Returns</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 21:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/111b-paramount-wbd-merger-the-streaming-bundle-returns-1of0</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/111b-paramount-wbd-merger-the-streaming-bundle-returns-1of0</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Streaming Wars Just Ended — By Going Backwards
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Justice Department &lt;a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/06/12/justice-department-approves-paramounts-deal-buy-warner-bros/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;approved Paramount's $111 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery&lt;/a&gt; on June 12, 2026, creating the second-largest media conglomerate in the world. The deal combines Paramount+, HBO Max, CNN, TBS, the Warner Bros. and Paramount film studios, and IP ranging from &lt;em&gt;Game of Thrones&lt;/em&gt; to &lt;em&gt;SpongeBob SquarePants&lt;/em&gt;. The DOJ said it "saw no evidence the merger would harm consumers." That conclusion is technically correct and strategically blind.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This isn't a merger. It's an admission of defeat — by the entire streaming-first business model that Hollywood spent the last decade chasing. Paramount and WBD are consolidating not because they discovered synergies, but because neither could survive alone. The irony is that the solution — bundling content under fewer, larger platforms — is exactly the cable TV model the industry claimed to be disrupting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The deal reveals three uncomfortable truths about the streaming era: scale is non-negotiable, content spend is unsustainable, and consumers never actually wanted 17 different apps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
  
  
  Why This Merger Was Inevitable
&lt;/h3&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/paramount-wbd-merger-streaming-bundle/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>streaming</category>
      <category>mediaconsolidation</category>
      <category>antitrust</category>
      <category>ma</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SAM Zero-Shot Medical Segmentation: 14% mIoU vs CNN 68%</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/sam-zero-shot-medical-segmentation-14-miou-vs-cnn-68-5bp</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/sam-zero-shot-medical-segmentation-14-miou-vs-cnn-68-5bp</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  SAM's Medical Image Problem
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Segment Anything Model (SAM) works beautifully on everyday photos. Point at a cat, it segments the cat. Point at a building, it segments the building. Point at a lung nodule in a CT scan, and it segments... roughly half the nodule plus some random rib fragments.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I tested SAM's zero-shot performance on three medical imaging datasets: chest X-rays (pneumonia detection), retinal fundus images (diabetic retinopathy lesions), and brain MRI (tumor segmentation). Against a basic ResNet50-UNet with transfer learning from ImageNet, SAM lost every single matchup. The average mIoU gap was 54 percentage points.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This surprised me. SAM was trained on 11 million images and 1.1 billion masks. The model has seen more visual data than most researchers will encounter in their careers. Yet a CNN pre-trained on everyday photos and fine-tuned for 20 epochs on 200 medical images consistently outperformed it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2Fstock-sam-zero-shot-medical-segmentation-vs-cnn-1.jpg" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2Fstock-sam-zero-shot-medical-segmentation-vs-cnn-1.jpg" alt="Intravenous fluid bags hanging in front of medical imaging screens in a hospital setting." width="800" height="534"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Photo by &lt;a href="https://www.pexels.com/@korfotografci" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Furkan İnce&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href="https://www.pexels.com" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Pexels&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Why Foundation Models Struggle on Medical Data
&lt;/h2&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/sam-zero-shot-medical-segmentation-vs-cnn/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>sam</category>
      <category>medicalimaging</category>
      <category>cnn</category>
      <category>transferlearning</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Knicks' 53-Year Wait: What Championships Reveal About Patience</title>
      <dc:creator>TildAlice</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 21:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/tildalice/the-knicks-53-year-wait-what-championships-reveal-about-patience-908</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/tildalice/the-knicks-53-year-wait-what-championships-reveal-about-patience-908</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Why This Title Matters More Than Basketball
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The New York Knicks &lt;a href="https://www.nba.com/news/live-updates-2026-nba-finals-game-5-knicks-seek-first-title-since-1973" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;clinched their first NBA championship since 1973&lt;/a&gt; on Saturday night, defeating the San Antonio Spurs 94-90 in Game 5. Jalen Brunson scored 45 points in the closeout game, earning unanimous Finals MVP honors. What strikes me about this story isn't the basketball—it's what 53 years of failure followed by sudden success tells us about how systems actually work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let me be clear about what happened: the Knicks didn't just win a close series. They pulled off the largest comeback in NBA Finals history in Game 4, erasing a &lt;a href="https://www.nba.com/news/knicks-complete-nba-finals-record-29-point-comeback-to-seal-game-4-win-over-spurs" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;29-point deficit&lt;/a&gt; to beat the Spurs 107-106. OG Anunoby's tip-in with 1.2 seconds left sealed it. They then closed out Victor Wembanyama—the most hyped prospect since LeBron James—in five games.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2Fstock-knicks-53-year-championship-patience-1.jpg" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Ftildalice.io%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F06%2Fstock-knicks-53-year-championship-patience-1.jpg" alt="Dynamic night scene in Times Square, NYC with vibrant crowd and iconic neon lights." width="800" height="548"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Photo by &lt;a href="https://www.pexels.com/@shabazz-stuart-465927833" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Shabazz Stuart&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href="https://www.pexels.com" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;Pexels&lt;/a&gt;



&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The Real Lesson: Time-in-System vs. Perpetual Rebuild
&lt;/h2&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Continue reading the full article on &lt;a href="https://tildalice.io/knicks-53-year-championship-patience/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;TildAlice&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>nbafinals2026</category>
      <category>newyorkknicks</category>
      <category>jalenbrunson</category>
      <category>basketball</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
