DEV Community: TrackTime Dev

Six-Minute Billing Increments Explained

TrackTime Dev — Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:49:20 +0000

If you have ever read a legal invoice, you have seen entries like "Telephone conference with client, 0.2" or "Review and revise motion, 1.4." Those decimals are not arbitrary. They are the visible surface of the most widespread convention in hourly professional billing: the six-minute increment. Law firms use it almost universally, as our guide to time tracking for lawyers explores, and many consultants, accountants, and other hourly professionals have adopted it as well. This post explains exactly what the convention means, how the rounding works, how to convert minutes to tenths without thinking hard, and why the system exists in the first place.

What a six-minute increment actually is

An hour contains sixty minutes, and one tenth of sixty minutes is six minutes. A six-minute increment is therefore simply one tenth of an hour, written as 0.1 on a timesheet or an invoice. Every duration you bill is expressed as some multiple of that tenth. A task recorded as 0.3 hours took three increments, or eighteen minutes. A task recorded as 1.5 hours took fifteen increments, or ninety minutes.

The reason for using tenths rather than minutes is arithmetic. Hourly billing means multiplying time by a rate, and multiplying $300 per hour by 47 minutes requires converting the minutes to a fraction of an hour first. Expressing the time as 0.8 hours makes the math immediate: 0.8 multiplied by $300 is $240. Decimal hours turn every line of an invoice into a one-step multiplication, which mattered enormously in the era of paper ledgers and still matters for anyone reviewing a bill.

How the rounding convention works

Real work does not arrive in clean six-minute blocks, so every increment system needs a rounding rule. The standard convention in legal billing is to round each task up to the next full increment. The logic is that any amount of work within an increment consumes that increment, in the same way a one-day car rental bills for the full day whether you drive it for one hour or ten.

Under the round-up convention, the conversion from actual minutes to billed tenths looks like this:

A task lasting 1 to 6 minutes bills as 0.1 hours.
A task lasting 7 to 12 minutes bills as 0.2 hours.
A task lasting 13 to 18 minutes bills as 0.3 hours.
A task lasting 19 to 24 minutes bills as 0.4 hours.
A task lasting 25 to 30 minutes bills as 0.5 hours.
A task lasting 31 to 36 minutes bills as 0.6 hours.
A task lasting 37 to 42 minutes bills as 0.7 hours.
A task lasting 43 to 48 minutes bills as 0.8 hours.
A task lasting 49 to 54 minutes bills as 0.9 hours.
A task lasting 55 to 60 minutes bills as 1.0 hours.

Some firms use round-to-nearest instead, under which an eight-minute task bills as 0.1 rather than 0.2 because eight minutes is closer to six than to twelve. Round-to-nearest is friendlier to clients and is sometimes required by corporate billing guidelines, but round-up remains the dominant convention. Whichever rule you use, the essential requirements are that you disclose it, typically in the engagement letter, and that you apply it uniformly to every task and every client.

Worked examples with real dollar amounts

Concrete numbers make the system intuitive, so consider an attorney billing at $300 per hour, which makes each tenth worth $30. A four-minute phone call rounds up to 0.1 hours and bills at $30, and our guide on how attorneys bill for phone calls covers these entries in depth. An eleven-minute call rounds up to 0.2 hours and bills at $60. A twenty-minute document review rounds up to 0.4 hours and bills at $120. A fifty-minute drafting session rounds up to 0.9 hours and bills at $270.

Now run a full example across a morning. Suppose you take a nine-minute call from a client at 8:50, spend thirty-two minutes revising a contract, answer a client email that takes five minutes, and then spend one hour and ten minutes preparing for a deposition. The call bills as 0.2, the revision as 0.6, the email as 0.1, and the preparation as 1.2, for a total of 2.1 hours. At $300 per hour, the morning is worth $630. Notice that the actual working time was one hour and fifty-six minutes, and the billed time is 2.1 hours. The five extra tenths of an hour are the cumulative effect of rounding up four separate tasks, which is precisely why the rounding rule must be disclosed and applied consistently.

Why the convention exists

The six-minute increment survives because it balances three competing needs at once:

Precision. Tenths of an hour are fine-grained enough to bill short tasks honestly. A quarter-hour system, by contrast, turns a three-minute call into a fifteen-minute charge, which quintuples the rounding error and invites disputes. This is the main reason legal billing standardized on tenths rather than the quarter-hour increments common in some other trades.
Simplicity. Decimal hours multiply cleanly against hourly rates, sum cleanly across a day, and read cleanly on an invoice. Nobody has to do base-sixty arithmetic to check a bill.
Fairness in both directions. The increment compensates the professional for the fixed cost of every task switch, since even a two-minute call requires stopping other work, engaging with the matter, and resuming afterward. At the same time, the small unit size keeps that compensation proportionate.

The part nobody tells you: increments make small tasks billable

Here is the practical consequence of everything above, and it is the one that changes behavior. Under a six-minute increment system, there is no such thing as a task too small to bill. The two-minute call, the ninety-second text exchange about a filing deadline, and the quick email reply each round up to 0.1 hours. At $300 per hour, each one is worth $30.

Yet these are exactly the tasks that never reach invoices, because they feel too trivial to write down at the moment they happen. The increment system says they are worth $30 apiece; the timekeeping habit treats them as worth nothing. An attorney who handles six such micro-tasks a day and logs none of them is quietly forfeiting 0.6 billable hours daily, and the arithmetic over a working year is painful to contemplate. We break down where that time goes in our post on the five ways billable time leaks out of your week.

Closing that gap is a capture problem rather than a math problem, the problem at the center of our guide to capturing every billable hour. Short tasks evade manual timers because no one starts a timer for a two-minute call, and they evade end-of-week reconstruction because memory discards them first. Studies of professional timekeeping consistently find that reconstructed timesheets understate the hours actually worked, and the smallest tasks account for a large share of the shortfall. This is the specific problem TrackTime was built for. Its Android app automatically captures the categories of small work that leak the most: inbound and outbound phone calls timed and matched to clients, SMS conversations and incoming RCS messages in Google Messages, time spent working in Gmail and Outlook, and drive time for client trips. Captured entries appear in the web dashboard, where you review them, round them to your increment policy, and turn them into invoices with the built-in invoicing tools. Privacy is metadata only: the service stores who, when, and how long, and never stores message contents or email subject lines. One honest limitation is worth stating plainly: this works on Android because Android permits it, and it cannot work on iPhone because iOS does not allow any app to observe calls, messages, or foreground apps at the operating-system level.

Common mistakes to avoid

Rounding twice. Round each task once, from its actual duration to the next tenth. Do not round the raw time up to a tenth and then round the daily total up again; the double rounding inflates the bill and will not survive an audit.
Estimating instead of measuring. Rounding is only defensible when it starts from a real duration. An attorney who guesses that a call took "about ten minutes" and bills 0.2 is stacking an estimate on top of a rounding rule, and estimates made from memory usually run short rather than long.
Fragmenting one task into many increments. If you make five two-minute calls on the same matter in one hour, billing five separate 0.1 entries is technically consistent with a round-up policy, but many clients and courts view deliberate fragmentation as abusive. When short tasks on one matter cluster tightly, the safer practice is to record them as they occurred and exercise judgment about consolidation before invoicing.
Hiding the policy. The increment and the rounding rule belong in the engagement letter. Clients accept rounding they were told about and dispute rounding they discover.

Frequently asked questions

What does 0.1 hours mean on an invoice?

It means one tenth of an hour, which is six minutes of billed time. It usually indicates a short task, such as a brief phone call or email, that took six minutes or less and was rounded up to the minimum increment. At a rate of $300 per hour, a 0.1 entry costs $30.

How do I convert minutes to decimal hours quickly?

Divide the minutes by six and round up to the next whole number, and that number is your tenths digit. For example, twenty-two minutes divided by six is a little under four, so it rounds up to four tenths and bills as 0.4 hours. With a little practice the conversion becomes automatic, and good billing software applies the rule for you.

Are six-minute increments better than fifteen-minute increments?

For the client, almost always. A fifteen-minute increment turns every short task into a 0.25-hour charge, so the rounding overhead is much larger and invoices drift further from the time actually worked. Six-minute increments keep billed time close to real time, which is why they are the standard in legal billing and a sensible default for any hourly professional.

Is rounding up to the next increment ethical?

Yes, provided the increment is reasonable, the policy is disclosed to the client in advance, and it is applied consistently from accurate underlying durations. Rounding becomes a problem when it is stacked on inflated estimates, applied twice, or used to fragment continuous work into many minimum charges. The rule of thumb is simple: the rounding convention should be something you would be comfortable explaining line by line to the client who is paying the bill.

Make the increments work in your favor

Six-minute increments mean every small task you perform has a real dollar value, but only if it gets captured. Start a free 7-day TrackTime trial and let a week of automatic capture show you how many billable tenths you are currently giving away, or see how the Android app works.

The Best Time Tracking Apps with Invoicing Built In

TrackTime Dev — Sat, 15 Aug 2026 18:30:24 +0000

Tracking time and billing for it are usually treated as two separate jobs handled by two separate tools. That split is where money dies. Hours get exported from one system, massaged in a spreadsheet, and pasted into an invoicing tool, and every step in that chain invites errors, delays, and quiet write-offs of entries that feel like too much trouble to carry across. The fix is structural: use a tool where the hour you track is already sitting in the system that sends the bill.

This list covers five apps that genuinely do both, and we ranked them on a single criterion: the quality of the path from a tracked hour to a sent invoice. That means we cared about how time entries become line items, how rates and rounding are applied, how the invoice looks to a client, and how the client pays it. Tools that track beautifully but bill poorly, and tools that bill beautifully but track nothing, both lost points.

One disclosure up front: TrackTime is our product. It leads this list because of how entries get into the system in the first place, and we have been straightforward about what each competitor does better, including the cases where you should choose one of them instead.

The five apps at a glance

TrackTime is the best choice when the problem is capturing the hours in the first place, since calls, texts, email time, and drive time flow automatically into a built-in invoicing workflow.
Harvest has the most polished time-to-invoice flow for small teams, with online payment built in.
Clockify is the budget pick, adding invoicing on its Standard tier at $5.49 per user per month.
Bill4Time is the specialist for legal billing, with trust accounting and LEDES invoice formats.
Clio Manage is the full practice management suite where invoicing is one piece of a much larger system.

1. TrackTime: best when the missing hours are the real problem

An invoicing feature can only bill the hours that made it into the system, and that is the quiet weakness of every tool below. TrackTime starts earlier in the chain. Its Android app runs in the background and automatically captures the work that rarely gets a timer: inbound and outbound cellular calls timed and matched to clients, SMS conversations and incoming RCS messages in Google Messages, time spent working in Gmail and Outlook, and drive time and mileage for client trips.

Those captured entries appear in the web dashboard for review and adjustment, and from there the invoicing is built in. You check the entries, assign or confirm the client, and generate the invoice from the same screen where the time lives. There is no export step and no second subscription. The plan includes unlimited clients, two-factor authentication, and full API access, and privacy is metadata only: TrackTime stores who, when, and how long, never message contents or email subject lines.

Pricing: The Professional plan is $14.99 per month or $161.89 per year for a single user, with a 7-day free trial. Team plans are available, and the Enterprise plan supports up to 30 users with team control from the dashboard.

Watch out for: Automatic capture requires an Android phone, because iOS does not allow any app to observe calls, message notifications, or foreground apps, and the full app is downloaded from TrackTime.com rather than Google Play. The invoicing itself is built for hourly billers rather than for specialized billing regimes, so if you need trust accounting or LEDES formats you should look at Bill4Time or Clio below. We compared the legal-specific field in detail in our roundup of time tracking apps for lawyers.

2. Harvest: the smoothest time-to-invoice flow for small teams

Harvest is what most people picture when they imagine time tracking and invoicing living together comfortably. You track hours against clients and projects with simple timers, and unbilled time accumulates until you turn it into an invoice in a few clicks. Invoices can be sent by email from inside the product, clients can pay online, and payment status flows back so you always know what is outstanding. For straightforward hourly billing, the distance from tracked hour to paid invoice is very short, and our TrackTime vs Harvest comparison looks at both tools side by side.

Pricing: Harvest offers a free single-seat plan, and the Teams plan is $9 per seat per month when billed annually. Harvest changed ownership in 2025, and its 2026 pricing added usage-based fees on top of seat prices for some features, so read the current pricing page carefully before committing.

Watch out for: The pricing change is the main caution, since usage-based fees make the total bill harder to predict than a flat seat price. Capture is entirely manual, so the calls and email you never timed are never invoiced, and there is nothing legal-specific such as trust accounting or LEDES support.

3. Clockify: invoicing on a budget

Clockify earns its place as the budget option. The free plan already handles unlimited users, timers, and timesheets, and the Standard tier adds invoicing at $5.49 per user per month, which makes it the cheapest route on this list to a combined tracking and billing stack; our TrackTime vs Clockify comparison covers the fuller feature picture. You mark time entries as billable with hourly rates, pull unbilled time into an invoice, and send it to the client, with the basics of taxes and discounts covered.

Pricing: The free plan supports unlimited users. Paid tiers run from $3.99 to $11.99 per user per month with annual billing, and invoicing starts on the Standard tier at $5.49.

Watch out for: The invoicing is serviceable rather than refined, and you will feel the difference next to Harvest in template polish and payment handling. Invoicing is also not on the free plan, which surprises people who chose Clockify specifically to avoid paying. As with the others, every tracked minute depends on someone remembering the timer.

4. Bill4Time: the legal billing specialist

Bill4Time exists for practices whose billing is more complicated than hours multiplied by a rate. It is built around legal time and billing, with trust (IOLTA) accounting, LEDES invoice formats for insurance and corporate clients, and ABA task codes, and its invoice templates can be customized to match the formats those clients demand. Time entries, expenses, and increments feed a billing engine that understands how legal invoices actually get reviewed and paid.

Pricing: The Time & Billing plan is $39 per user per month billed annually, or $49 billed monthly. The Legal Pro tier is $59 per user per month with annual billing, and Legal Enterprise is $89.

Watch out for: You are paying specialist prices for specialist features, and a consultant or freelancer with simple hourly billing does not need most of them. The interface is functional rather than modern, and capture is manual, so the billing engine is only as complete as the timers and after-the-fact entries feeding it.

5. Clio Manage: invoicing inside a full practice suite

Clio is the dominant legal practice management platform, and its billing module is genuinely strong. Bills are generated from unbilled time and expenses logged to a matter, LEDES formats and split billing are supported, and clients can pay invoices online by card or bank transfer through emailed links and a client portal. If you want intake, matters, documents, billing, and payments in one system, this is that system.

Pricing: Plans run from $49 to $149 per user per month billed monthly, or $39 to $139 with annual billing. The popular Essentials tier is $89 per user per month.

Watch out for: Judged purely on the time-to-invoice criterion, Clio asks you to buy an entire practice management suite to get its billing workflow, and at $89 per user per month for the popular tier, that is an expensive way to send invoices if you do not need the rest. The time tracking is manual timers, so the capture problem is untouched.

How to choose

If entries are missing before billing even starts, meaning calls, texts, and email never got tracked at all, TrackTime fixes the input side and includes the invoicing, provided you carry an Android phone.
If you track diligently and want the most pleasant path from hours to a paid invoice, Harvest remains the benchmark for small teams.
If you want the lowest possible price for a combined stack, Clockify's Standard tier is hard to argue with at $5.49 per user per month.
If your clients require trust accounting, LEDES files, or task codes, Bill4Time gives you the billing specialist tools alone, and Clio gives you those tools inside a full practice platform.

One principle sits underneath all five recommendations. The invoice can never be better than the timesheet behind it, and a timesheet reconstructed from memory understates the work. Whichever tool you pick, record time when the work happens, not after; our guide to capturing every billable hour shows what that takes in practice.

Frequently asked questions

Why does built-in invoicing matter if I already use accounting software?

Because the handoff is where billable entries get lost. When hours live in one tool and invoices in another, every billing cycle involves exporting, reformatting, and re-entering data, and small entries tend to get dropped along the way because they feel like too much effort to carry over. When the invoice is generated from the same system that holds the time, every captured entry is one click from being billed.

Does Clockify's free plan include invoicing?

No. The free plan covers tracking, timesheets, and reports for unlimited users, but invoicing begins on the Standard tier at $5.49 per user per month with annual billing. It is still the cheapest paid route to invoicing on this list.

What is LEDES billing and do I need it?

LEDES is a standardized electronic invoice format that insurance companies and corporate legal departments often require from outside counsel. If your clients ask for it, you need a tool that produces it, which on this list means Bill4Time or Clio. If no client has ever mentioned LEDES to you, you almost certainly do not need it.

Can these tools handle billing increments and rounding?

The legal tools are strongest here, since Bill4Time and Clio support the six-minute increments common in legal billing, and TrackTime lets you review and adjust every captured entry before it reaches an invoice. General tools such as Harvest and Clockify record raw durations and leave stricter increment conventions to you.

Bill the hours you actually worked

Any tool on this list will shorten the distance between your work and your revenue. The bigger question is whether the hours are getting recorded at all, because the entries that never existed are the ones no invoicing feature can save. Start a free 7-day TrackTime trial and see how much billable time a week of automatic capture turns up, or learn how the Android app captures calls, texts, email, and drive time.

Why iPhones Cannot Automatically Track Your Calls (and What iOS Users Can Do)

TrackTime Dev — Tue, 04 Aug 2026 12:20:43 +0000

If you bill clients by the hour and you carry an iPhone, you have probably searched for an app that automatically logs your phone calls as billable time. The idea is obvious and attractive. Every call to a client is work, every call has a precise start and end, and your phone already knows both. It seems like the easiest thing in the world for an app to write those calls into a timesheet for you.

Here is the honest answer, stated plainly: no app can do this on an iPhone, and no app ever has. This is not a matter of engineering effort or of waiting for a clever developer to figure it out. Apple's operating system is deliberately designed so that third-party apps cannot observe call activity, cannot read notifications from other apps, and cannot see which app you are using. Any product that implies otherwise is describing something other than genuine automatic capture. In this post we will walk through exactly what iOS restricts, why Apple built it that way, why the same capture is possible on Android, and what iPhone-based professionals can realistically do about it.

The three restrictions that matter

Automatic time capture on a phone depends on the ability to observe what is happening on the device. To log a call as billable time, an app needs to know that a call started, that it ended, and who was on the other end. To capture texting or email time, an app needs some visibility into messaging activity or app usage. iOS closes every one of those doors to third-party software.

No access to call activity or call history

On an iPhone, your call history belongs to the Phone app and to Apple. There is no permission a third-party app can request that grants access to the list of recent calls, and there is no supported way for an app running in the background to learn that a cellular call just started, who the caller was, and how long the conversation lasted. Apple does provide narrow, purpose-built interfaces for specific jobs, such as identifying and blocking spam callers, but those interfaces are one-way by design. They let an app supply information to the system. They do not let the app read your calling activity back out. Without the number, the duration, and reliable confirmation that the call happened at all, there is nothing for a time tracker to record.

No visibility into notifications from other apps

On Android, a user can explicitly grant an app the ability to observe incoming notifications, which is how messaging activity can be detected and timed. iOS has no equivalent. A third-party iPhone app can manage its own notifications, and nothing else. It cannot see that a text message arrived, that an email landed, or that any other app posted anything. The entire category of notification-based capture simply does not exist on iOS.

No foreground app detection

The third pillar of automatic capture is knowing which app is currently on screen, because that is how time spent writing email or working in a document gets attributed. Android exposes this through a permission the user can grant. iOS does not expose it to third parties in any usable form. Apple's own Screen Time feature demonstrates that the operating system tracks this information internally, but that data is not available to outside developers as a stream an app could turn into client-attributed time entries. An iPhone app effectively goes blind the moment you switch away from it.

This is a policy, not a gap

It is worth being clear that none of this is an oversight. Apple made a deliberate architectural decision that third-party apps live in strict sandboxes and cannot observe activity outside their own walls. That decision has real benefits. It is one of the reasons spyware and stalkerware are harder to build for iOS, and it is a reasonable default for the hundreds of millions of iPhone owners who never asked to be observed by anything.

The cost of that decision falls on a specific group: professionals who want to consent to observation of their own device because their calls and messages are literally billable work. iOS has no mechanism for that consent. There is no advanced permission, no enterprise toggle, and no accessibility pathway that changes the answer. Android took a different position. It defaults to the same privacy protections, but it allows a user to knowingly and explicitly grant deeper access, permission by permission, with the operating system warning them about what they are granting. Reasonable people can prefer either philosophy. What matters for this article is the practical consequence: genuine automatic capture of calls and messages is possible on Android and impossible on iOS.

What iPhone "automatic" trackers actually do

You will find iOS apps that market themselves as automatic time trackers, and it is fair to ask what they are doing if the restrictions above are real. The answer is inference. Instead of observing the work, they observe adjacent evidence that iOS does permit and guess at the work from it. The common techniques are calendar inference, which assumes you spent the scheduled hour in the scheduled meeting, and location inference, which assumes that time spent at a client's address was time spent working for that client. Some tools also prompt you at intervals to confirm what you were doing.

Inference is not worthless. A calendar-driven timesheet is better than a blank one. But notice what it structurally cannot see: the unscheduled eleven-minute call, the text thread answered from the couch, and the email triage session that happened between meetings. Those interrupt-driven moments are precisely the time that leaks out of manual timesheets in the first place, and they are invisible to calendar and location data. If you want to understand how much that leakage costs, our post on the five ways billable time leaks walks through it in detail.

What iOS users can actually do

None of this means an iPhone-based professional is helpless. It means the strategy has to change from capture to discipline, with a few structural aids, and many of the habits in our guide to capturing every billable hour still apply. Here is what works in practice.

Log calls immediately, not at day's end. The single highest-value habit is entering a call the moment it ends, while the duration and the topic are still in front of you. Time reconstructed hours or days later reliably understates the work, so shrinking the gap between the call and the record is where iPhone users recover the most.
Use your Recents list as a nightly checklist. Apps cannot read your iPhone call history, but you can. A two-minute end-of-day sweep through the Phone app's Recents screen, checking each client call against your timesheet, catches most of what slipped. The durations shown there give you accurate numbers instead of guesses.
Let your calendar carry the scheduled work. For meetings and planned calls, calendar-based logging is reasonable. Book the call, hold the time, and convert the event into an entry afterward with the real duration.
Reduce friction on the manual timer. If you use a manual tracker, put it one tap away and pre-load your active clients so that starting a timer costs almost nothing. Most manual tracking failures are friction failures.
Consider your device choice for work communication. This is the structural option. Some professionals carry an Android device as the work phone, or route client calls to an Android device, precisely because it can capture calls, texts, and email time automatically. It is a bigger change than a new habit, but it is the only path to true automatic capture today.

Where TrackTime stands on iOS

TrackTime's automatic capture runs on Android, where the operating system permits it. With the user's permission, the Android app times inbound and outbound cellular calls and matches them to clients, captures SMS conversations and incoming RCS messages in Google Messages, tracks time spent working in Gmail and Outlook, and records drive time and mileage for client trips. Everything captured is metadata only, meaning who, when, and how long. Message contents and email subject lines are never stored.

There is no TrackTime iOS app, and we will not pretend that one could do what the Android app does. Building an iPhone app that claims automatic capture would mean shipping the same inference-based guesswork we described above, and we would rather tell you the truth about the platform than sell you around it. If Apple ever changes these rules, the calculus changes with it. Until then, honesty is the feature.

Frequently asked questions

Can any iPhone app see my call log or call durations?

No. iOS provides no permission that grants a third-party app access to your call history or to live call activity. The interfaces Apple does offer, such as those used by spam-blocking apps, let an app supply data to the system rather than read your calls out of it. You can view your own history in the Phone app's Recents list, but no outside app can.

Do iOS apps that advertise automatic time tracking actually work?

They work at what they actually do, which is inference rather than observation. They build timesheets from your calendar, your location, and your confirmations. That approach covers scheduled work reasonably well and misses unscheduled calls, texts, and email sessions almost entirely, because iOS gives them no way to see those events.

Why can Android apps do this when iPhone apps cannot?

Android's permission model lets a user explicitly grant an app deeper access, including visibility into calls, notifications, and app usage, with clear system warnings about each grant. Apple chose not to offer equivalent permissions at all. Both are deliberate design positions, and the practical result is that consent-based automatic capture exists on Android and does not exist on iOS.

Is Apple likely to allow this in the future?

We would not plan around it. These restrictions are core to Apple's privacy positioning and have tightened rather than loosened over the years. Regulatory pressure has forced iOS to open in some areas, but there is no current indication that call, notification, or app-usage observation will be among them.

If your billable time lives on your phone

The gap between what you work and what you bill is largest for exactly the activity a phone handles: calls, texts, and email on the move. On iPhone, the best available answer is disciplined manual logging backed by your Recents list and calendar. On Android, the answer can be automatic. Start a free 7-day TrackTime trial to see what a week of automatic capture looks like, or read how the Android app works before you decide what belongs in your pocket.