<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Văn Tuấn Lê</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Văn Tuấn Lê (@vn_tunl_09a36fcbda701).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/vn_tunl_09a36fcbda701</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/vn_tunl_09a36fcbda701"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I Pitted 3 Chinese AI Models Against 3 American Ones on 14 World Cup Matches</title>
      <dc:creator>Văn Tuấn Lê</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 05:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/vn_tunl_09a36fcbda701/i-pitted-3-chinese-ai-models-against-3-american-ones-on-14-world-cup-matches-363c</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/vn_tunl_09a36fcbda701/i-pitted-3-chinese-ai-models-against-3-american-ones-on-14-world-cup-matches-363c</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fdy1yc2h4gyurf01ju1s6.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fdy1yc2h4gyurf01ju1s6.png" alt=" " width="800" height="573"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
I had a weird idea during the World Cup: what if I asked every major AI — both Chinese and American — to predict the same 14 matches? Then bought real tickets based on the results?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I ran Kimi, Doubao, and Qianwen (China) against ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude (US) on 14 real World Cup fixtures.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The result that surprised me&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They agreed on 12 out of 14 matches.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Six AI models from two completely different ecosystems, trained on different data in different languages — and they converged on the same prediction 86% of the time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The one match where they split&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Norway vs Senegal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;🇨🇳 All 3 Chinese AI: Norway wins&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;🇺🇸 All 3 American AI: Draw&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not a single crossover. Every Chinese model picked one result, every American model picked another — like a clean cultural fault line running through the data.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have no idea if it means anything. But I bought two real lottery tickets (¥2 each) — one following the Chinese consensus, one following the American consensus.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Results drop June 24. I'll post the follow-up here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why I did this&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm an ordinary guy in China running a public experiment: can AI actually help a regular person build side income? I'm documenting everything — wins, failures, and the weird stuff in between.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is one of the weird ones.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;Full breakdown with all 14 predictions: ordinarymantrying.com (&lt;a href="https://ordinarymantrying.com/6-ai-models-predict-world-cup-china-vs-us/" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://ordinarymantrying.com/6-ai-models-predict-world-cup-china-vs-us/&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Part 2 (results + analysis) coming June 24.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
      <category>discuss</category>
      <category>watercooler</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
