<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: voonterr</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by voonterr (@voonterr).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/voonterr</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/voonterr"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>RealityLint: a static tool that checks whether your README still matches your repository</title>
      <dc:creator>voonterr</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 22:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/voonterr/realitylint-a-static-tool-that-checks-whether-your-readme-still-matches-your-repository-5hg</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/voonterr/realitylint-a-static-tool-that-checks-whether-your-readme-still-matches-your-repository-5hg</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;README files often drift away from the projects they describe.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A script gets renamed. A file moves. &lt;code&gt;.env.example&lt;/code&gt; disappears. The project switches package managers. But the README still confidently tells people to do the old thing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I built &lt;strong&gt;RealityLint&lt;/strong&gt; to catch this kind of drift automatically.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s a static, deterministic checker that compares locally verifiable README claims against the actual repository — without executing README commands.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What it can detect
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;RealityLint can catch things like:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;missing &lt;code&gt;npm&lt;/code&gt; / &lt;code&gt;yarn&lt;/code&gt; / &lt;code&gt;pnpm&lt;/code&gt; / &lt;code&gt;bun&lt;/code&gt; scripts&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;broken local links and paths&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;missing &lt;code&gt;.env.example&lt;/code&gt; / &lt;code&gt;.env.sample&lt;/code&gt; files&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;package manager / lockfile mismatches&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;missing Python entry files&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;missing Makefile targets&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;outdated project version claims&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;license claims without a matching license file&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Why I made it
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wanted something that helps keep documentation honest.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A lot of docs rot happens quietly:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;setup instructions stop matching the repo&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;filenames change but docs don't&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;commands stay in the README long after they stop working&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That kind of drift confuses users, contributors, and sometimes even the project owner.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Design goals
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;RealityLint was built to stay predictable:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;no LLM&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;no API key&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;no source code upload&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;README commands are &lt;strong&gt;parsed but never executed&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;deterministic results&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;works locally and in GitHub Actions&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Install
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From PyPI:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight shell"&gt;&lt;code&gt;pip &lt;span class="nb"&gt;install &lt;/span&gt;realitylint
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;p&gt;Then run:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight shell"&gt;&lt;code&gt;realitylint &lt;span class="nb"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;



&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  GitHub
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Repository:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://github.com/voonterr/realitylint" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/voonterr/realitylint&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Current status
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The project is already available on PyPI and can also be used as a GitHub Action.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Right now I’m especially interested in feedback on:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;what README checks would be most useful next&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;what kinds of documentation drift you see most often&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;what would make this more useful in CI pipelines&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you’ve dealt with stale docs in your own projects, I’d love to hear what kinds of checks you wish existed.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>showdev</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>python</category>
      <category>github</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
