Most VPNs ask you to trust a "no logs" page. This one makes logging a hardware problem.

vpvpvpvpvp — Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:24:13 +0000

Affiliate disclosure: I get a commission if you sign up through the link in this post. The product is vp.net. Judge the architecture, not the pitch.

Most consumer VPNs sell a policy. "We don't log." That is a promise a staff member, a subpoena, or a buyer can break.

vp.net is trying a different bet: run the server-side logic inside Intel SGX enclaves so the operator is not supposed to be able to read your session even if they want to. Clients can check an Intel-signed attestation that the running enclave hash matches the published code.

That is the whole product. Not a feature list. Not a streaming badge.

What you can actually verify

Enclave code is public: https://github.com/vpdotnet/vpnetd-sgx
Builds are meant to be reproducible
The client checks Intel-signed MRENCLAVE attestation on connect
WireGuard-compatible tunnel, apps on the usual platforms

What you still have to decide

You are trusting Intel SGX and the implementation, not a PDF policy
SGX has a history of research attacks. Read the skepticism. Then read the code.
Payment still creates a trail unless you go out of your way
It is a young network. Do not pretend it has Nord's footprint.

If you already like Mullvad or Proton, stay there. If your question is "can the VPN company see me," this is one of the few answers that is not just a lawyer letter.

Try it here: https://vp.net/?_a=4lJwj1

Current public pricing (confirm on the page before you pay): 3-year $5.55/mo, yearly $8.33/mo, monthly $9.95. Each plan is unlimited bandwidth, 5 devices, 24/7 support.

DEV Community: vpvpvpvpvp

Most VPNs ask you to trust a "no logs" page. This one makes logging a hardware problem.