<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: 서권혁</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by 서권혁 (@wandukong99).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/wandukong99</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/wandukong99"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Why I Still Test Manually in the Age of AI</title>
      <dc:creator>서권혁</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/wandukong99/why-i-still-test-manually-in-the-age-of-ai-1kjb</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/wandukong99/why-i-still-test-manually-in-the-age-of-ai-1kjb</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I've been doing QA for over four years. I've shipped apps, caught bugs, &lt;br&gt;
and watched releases go wrong in ways no automated tool predicted.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So when people ask me why I still test manually when AI can generate &lt;br&gt;
checklists in seconds — here's my honest answer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because AI wasn't there when the checkout button stopped working &lt;br&gt;
on an iPad in landscape mode. My finger was.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  The bugs that actually make it to production
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In my experience, the bugs that slip through aren't the obvious ones. &lt;br&gt;
Automated tests catch those.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The ones that hurt are quieter:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A payment flow that completes successfully — but creates a duplicate &lt;br&gt;
order when the network is slow. A push notification that lands correctly &lt;br&gt;
but deep-links to the wrong screen after an OS update. A bug that was &lt;br&gt;
fixed three releases ago, reappearing because nobody re-tested it &lt;br&gt;
when something nearby changed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've seen all of these. In real apps. Shipped by teams that thought &lt;br&gt;
they had it covered.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  What I actually do before every release
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm not anti-AI. I use it every day.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But before every release, I still open the app on a real device &lt;br&gt;
and go through the same checklist. Not because I don't trust the &lt;br&gt;
automated tests — but because I've learned what they miss.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A few things I always check on mobile:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Does the back button behave correctly on every key screen?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Does the app recover properly when the network drops mid-payment?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Does the layout hold up on a tablet, rotated to landscape?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;After the last bug fix — did anything nearby quietly break?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;None of these are exotic. But they're the ones that show up &lt;br&gt;
in production reviews and one-star app store ratings.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  Why I built a template for this
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At some point I realized I was running the same checks before every &lt;br&gt;
release — just from memory. So I turned it into a spreadsheet.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you're shipping a mobile app without a dedicated QA engineer, &lt;br&gt;
you might find it useful:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;→ &lt;a href="https://narong.gumroad.com/l/hnqru" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Mobile App QA Checklist&lt;/a&gt; — iOS &amp;amp; Android&lt;br&gt;
→ &lt;a href="https://narong.gumroad.com/l/ilodfn" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;QA Test Management System&lt;/a&gt; — for managing test cases and bugs&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;What's the most unexpected bug you've caught through manual testing &lt;br&gt;
that your automated tests completely missed? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm curious — drop it in the comments.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>testing</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>mobile</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
