<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: wendel andrady</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by wendel andrady (@wendel_andrady).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/wendel_andrady</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/wendel_andrady"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>How I approached multi-tenancy in Next.js with PostgreSQL RLS</title>
      <dc:creator>wendel andrady</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 15:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/wendel_andrady/how-i-approached-multi-tenancy-in-nextjs-with-postgresql-rls-1d8e</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/wendel_andrady/how-i-approached-multi-tenancy-in-nextjs-with-postgresql-rls-1d8e</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Multi-tenancy looks simple at first.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You add an &lt;code&gt;organization_id&lt;/code&gt; to your tables, check it in your queries, and move on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem is that this puts a lot of responsibility on application code.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wanted tenant isolation to be enforced at the database level too, so I used PostgreSQL Row Level Security (RLS).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The basic architecture is:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Users belong to organizations&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Organization membership determines access&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Server-side authorization handles application permissions&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;PostgreSQL RLS provides another layer of tenant isolation&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Roles such as Owner, Admin, and Member control what users can do&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This also makes other parts of the application more interesting:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Team invitations&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Organization switching&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;API keys&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Usage limits&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Billing tied to organizations&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The biggest lesson for me was that multi-tenancy isn't really a single feature.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's an authorization model that needs to stay consistent across the application and database.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I built these patterns into a reusable B2B SaaS foundation because I got tired of rebuilding them for every project.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you're building a multi-tenant SaaS with Next.js and Supabase, I've put the full foundation here:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://andrady.co" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://andrady.co&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'd be interested to hear how other Next.js developers approach tenant isolation. Do you rely mainly on application-level checks, RLS, or both?&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>architecture</category>
      <category>database</category>
      <category>nextjs</category>
      <category>security</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
