<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: With Attitude</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by With Attitude (@with_attitude).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/with_attitude"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Get AI Recommended. AI Search Brought Me 51 Subscribers in 60 Days. And It Wasn’t LLMs.txt.</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 12:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/get-ai-recommended-ai-search-brought-me-51-subscribers-in-60-days-and-it-wasnt-llmstxt-hbg</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/get-ai-recommended-ai-search-brought-me-51-subscribers-in-60-days-and-it-wasnt-llmstxt-hbg</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The first in a practical series on making your work easier for AI to find, cite, recommend, and turn into subscribers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ChatGPT took 7 months to find me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Claude took 6.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Perplexity Computer: under 3.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I discovered that Google was citing my work, I had a brief, but glorious,*well, look at me *moment. And for months, I assumed my llms.txt was to thank for that. I put real work into making it part of my content flow.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And if you have been reading about AI search, you have probably seen this advice:&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/get-cited-ai-search-google-ai-overviews" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is the CCAR-F Exam, and Is It Worth It? A Decision Guide for Claude Builders</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 07:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/what-is-the-ccar-f-exam-and-is-it-worth-it-a-decision-guide-for-claude-builders-b7j</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/what-is-the-ccar-f-exam-and-is-it-worth-it-a-decision-guide-for-claude-builders-b7j</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Claude Certified Architect – Foundations eligibility, cost, domains, practice questions, study plan, and whether the certification is worth it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Last verified: September 1, 2026&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CCAR-F, or Claude Certified Architect – Foundations, is the Foundations certification in &lt;a href="https://www.pearsonvue.com/us/en/anthropic.html" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Anthropic’s Architect track&lt;/a&gt;. It tests production architecture decisions across Claude Code, the Claude Agent SDK, the Claude API, agentic systems, Model Context Protocol (MCP), prompt engineering, structured output, context management, and reliability.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The exam has 60 multiple-choice and multiple-response questions, lasts 120 minutes, and costs $125. Pearson VUE delivers it online or at a test centre. Anthropic currently limits access to people at organizations in the Claude Partner Network.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/claude-certified-architect-foundations-exam" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>claude</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>beginners</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Claude Fable 5.1: What Chinese Coverage Says and English Doesn’t</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 07:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/claude-fable-51-what-chinese-coverage-says-and-english-doesnt-309f</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/claude-fable-51-what-chinese-coverage-says-and-english-doesnt-309f</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;136 Chinese queries later: What English coverage of Fable 5.1 missed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My newest obsession is comparing how AI is discussed in the two countries shaping its frontier: the US and China.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I want to see what happens when you place the coverage side by side, for three reasons.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;First, a model release may be a technical event, but the coverage around it is often cultural. It shows what each country celebrates and fears.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/claude-fable-5-1-chinese-vs-english-coverage" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>claude</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Claude Fable 5.1: Pricing, Benchmarks, and the Safeguard Tax</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/claude-fable-51-pricing-benchmarks-and-the-safeguard-tax-1d59</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/claude-fable-51-pricing-benchmarks-and-the-safeguard-tax-1d59</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Claude Fable 5.1 explained: pricing, benchmarks, API changes, Mythos 5.1 comparison, and Anthropics measurable safeguard overhead.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Last verified: September 2, 2026&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/claude-fable-5-1-safeguard-tax" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>claude</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Read AI Model Cards Like an AI Product Manager</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 11:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/how-to-read-ai-model-cards-like-an-ai-product-manager-50j7</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/how-to-read-ai-model-cards-like-an-ai-product-manager-50j7</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Free guide: Read AI model cards as a product manager, test benchmark claims, expose assumptions, and decide whether a model belongs in your product.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/builder-parent-paradox" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;The Builder-Parent Paradox&lt;/a&gt;, readers started asking me two new questions:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Today Im sharing the methodology I use to read model releases. It has evolved over time and, given sufficient encouragement, could easily become a much longer article. But Im told readers occasionally need to eat.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The short version: define the use, inspect the evidence, map the system, expose the assumptions, make a decision, then monitor what happens after launch.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/how-to-read-ai-model-cards-ai-product-manager" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>product</category>
      <category>beginners</category>
      <category>tutorial</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Does Pangram Work on Substack? I Ran a 159,002-Word Experiment During Its First Month</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 07:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/does-pangram-work-on-substack-i-ran-a-159002-word-experiment-during-its-first-month-4nja</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/does-pangram-work-on-substack-i-ran-a-159002-word-experiment-during-its-first-month-4nja</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An independent, single-author experiment across AI output, human writing, meeting transcripts and edited drafts.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’ve been running a secret experiment on everything I write (and some of what I say in meetings) sinceannounced &lt;a href="https://post.substack.com/p/against-claudefishing" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;the roll-out of Pangram on July 21, 2026&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AI-assisted or entirely mine, every piece of writing went into the experiment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A total of 159,002 words.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/substack-pangram-ai-detector-experiment-results" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>substack</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GLM-5.3 Was Trained for Cybersecurity. The Overshoot Was the Surprise.</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 20:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/glm-53-was-trained-for-cybersecurity-the-overshoot-was-the-surprise-2g6g</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/glm-53-was-trained-for-cybersecurity-the-overshoot-was-the-surprise-2g6g</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I audit Z.ai’s training claims, benchmarks, pricing, parameter count and delayed open-weight release.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Z.ai used one word to describe GLM-5.3’s security results, and that word changes how every benchmark is interpreted.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Emergent.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s clever language. Emergence has no author.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.3" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the launch post&lt;/a&gt; carefully. Z.ai introduced vulnerability-discovery data. It created environments where the model could practise. It collaborated with security teams in China on real codebases. When its multi-stage exploitation performance exceeded expectations, the language shifted to “emergence.”&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/glm-5-3-cyber-capability-benchmarks-open-weights" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stop Letting AI Choose Your Aesthetic: How to Build Stunning Websites When Your Taste Is Clear but Your Vocabulary Isn’t</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 07:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/stop-letting-ai-choose-your-aesthetic-how-to-build-stunning-websites-when-your-taste-is-clear-but-3idi</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/stop-letting-ai-choose-your-aesthetic-how-to-build-stunning-websites-when-your-taste-is-clear-but-3idi</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Kimi K3: I designed the same newsletter hero 11 times. Every version is stunning. Copy the exact prompt and code for each.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After my&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/claude-design-review-prompts-figma" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Claude Design review&lt;/a&gt;, four PwA members have independently asked about design styles that don’t look blatantly AI-ish.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Or, more precisely: how to brief AI when the visual is clear in your head but not on your tongue.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We usually learn to like before we learn to explain why. And that's okay.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don’t ever let it make you feel like you’re not ready to start experimenting. None of us were born with a design vocabulary.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/kimi-k3-ai-website-design-styles" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>programming</category>
      <category>tutorial</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Skill: Weekly Reader Question Review</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 12:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/skill-weekly-reader-question-review-55nh</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/skill-weekly-reader-question-review-55nh</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Analyze recent reader questions and identify recurring themes, pain points, and content opportunities.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Skill was created in &lt;a href="https://www.cluing.io/?utm_source=newsletter&amp;amp;utm_medium=substack&amp;amp;utm_campaign=agents&amp;amp;utm_content=karo" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Cluing&lt;/a&gt; and tested in ChatGPT and Claude Cowork as a companion resource to my article on using Cluing for AI-powered research, knowledge management, and content workflows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/cluing-review-ai-agents-second-brain-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the article first&lt;/a&gt;for the full setup and context.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/weekly-reader-question-review-content-planning-skill" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google Analytics 4 Cluing Agent Instructions + Daily GA4 Analysis Prompt</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 12:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/google-analytics-4-cluing-agent-instructions-daily-ga4-analysis-prompt-hpe</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/google-analytics-4-cluing-agent-instructions-daily-ga4-analysis-prompt-hpe</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A ready-to-customize Cluing AI agent prompt for monitoring Google Analytics 4, diagnosing traffic and conversion changes, detecting anomalies, and generating daily GA4 reports.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This Cluing AI agent instruction is a companion resource to my article on using Cluing for AI-powered research, knowledge management, and content workflows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/cluing-review-ai-agents-second-brain-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Read the article first&lt;/a&gt; for the full setup and context.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/google-analytics-4-ga4-cluing-agent-instructions-daily-analysis" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>This Second Brain Will Change How You Write Your Newsletter: Cluing Review + AI Agents Preview</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 12:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/this-second-brain-will-change-how-you-write-your-newsletter-cluing-review-ai-agents-preview-2dnn</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/this-second-brain-will-change-how-you-write-your-newsletter-cluing-review-ai-agents-preview-2dnn</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The new Cluing agents, MCP into Claude, Codex, Perplexity and Gemini, plus a gift for my readers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m preparing for an AI Architect exam, which means I spend several hours a week asking AI to teach me how to AI, then searching the web for more AI, so I can pass an exam about AI.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A few weeks back, I was doing exactly that. Things were going well until I searched for a page and discovered I already had it open.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/cluing-review-ai-agents-second-brain-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>claude</category>
      <category>perplexity</category>
      <category>programming</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I Build AI Products for a Living. Here Are 5 Things All Model Comparisons Miss.</title>
      <dc:creator>With Attitude</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 12:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/with_attitude/i-build-ai-products-for-a-living-here-are-5-things-all-model-comparisons-miss-3ghj</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/with_attitude/i-build-ai-products-for-a-living-here-are-5-things-all-model-comparisons-miss-3ghj</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;What ChatGPT Work, Perplexity Computer and Claude Cowork assume about us, the users, and what they reveal about perceived AI intelligence.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is perhaps not the finest evidence of my fiscal restraint: I pay separately for ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity (roughly $320 in subscriptions a month).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, I know there’s overlap.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, I know I can access some of these models through Perplexity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But for me it makes perfect sense. I pay for the *intelligence *underneath and the *product experience *sitting on top.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://karozieminski.substack.com/p/chatgpt-work-vs-claude-cowork-vs-perplexity-computer" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Continue reading on Substack →&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>claude</category>
      <category>perplexity</category>
      <category>chatgpt</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
