<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: wontopos</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by wontopos (@wontopos).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/wontopos</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/wontopos"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>WMB-100K: We built the first 100,000-turn benchmark for AI memory systems</title>
      <dc:creator>wontopos</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/wontopos/wmb-100k-we-built-the-first-100000-turn-benchmark-for-ai-memory-systems-2doi</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/wontopos/wmb-100k-we-built-the-first-100000-turn-benchmark-for-ai-memory-systems-2doi</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Most AI memory benchmarks are surprisingly small.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;LOCOMO tests 600 turns. LongMemEval tests around 1,000. That's roughly one week of casual usage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But real AI companions, assistants, and memory systems don't get used for a week — they get used for months. Years. What happens to memory accuracy at that scale? Nobody had tested it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So we built WMB-100K.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F4covg2lbl9mj7gvvkh71.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2F4covg2lbl9mj7gvvkh71.png" alt=" " width="543" height="231"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
What it is&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;WMB-100K is an open-source benchmark that tests AI memory systems at 100,000 turns — roughly a year of heavy usage. It measures one thing: can your memory system find the right information when it matters?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not LLM reasoning. Not response quality. Just memory.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What makes it different&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Three things set WMB-100K apart from existing benchmarks:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Scale — 100,000 turns across 10 life categories (daily life, relationships, health, career, finances, and more)&lt;br&gt;
Difficulty levels — 5 levels from simple fact lookup to multi-hop reasoning across 3,134 questions&lt;br&gt;
False memory probes — 430+ questions about things that were never mentioned. "I don't know" is the correct answer. Confidently giving wrong information = -0.25 pts penalty&lt;br&gt;
Why false memory matters&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Every other benchmark rewards correct answers. WMB-100K also punishes hallucination.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An AI that forgets something is annoying. An AI that remembers something that never happened is dangerous.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How to run it&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dataset is already included. You just need an OpenAI API key for scoring.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Total cost: ~$0.07&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Results so far&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fcq1nd7u6b44igm5jle30.png" class="article-body-image-wrapper"&gt;&lt;img src="https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fcq1nd7u6b44igm5jle30.png" alt=" " width="800" height="386"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
We tested memory systems at 100,000 turns. Accuracy drops to near zero at this scale — in ways smaller benchmarks never catch. Systems that score 66% at 600 turns flatline at 100K.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We're testing more systems and will be updating the leaderboard. If you run it against your own system, drop your results in the GitHub issues — or leave a comment below. Would love to see how different systems hold up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you find it useful, a ⭐ on GitHub goes a long way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;GitHub: &lt;a href="https://github.com/Irina1920/WMB-100K" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://github.com/Irina1920/WMB-100K&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>machinelearning</category>
      <category>opensource</category>
      <category>python</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
