DEV Community: Zavodiuk

An open letter

Zavodiuk — Wed, 26 Aug 2026 13:46:31 +0000

An Open Letter to the Shareholders of Alphabet (Google), Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Key Venture Market Participants
Why Tech Giants' Servers Are Crashing, or the Collapse of the Era of "Blind" Autoregressive Models
Since early August 2026, the market has witnessed a strange phenomenon: the infrastructure of Google Gemini and related platforms has begun to choke, query processing speeds have dropped multiple times, and users are mass-encountering lags and time-outs. Behind the scenes of this collapse lies a specific technical reason: an truncated, stripped-down fragment of my conceptual core for AI—the "Harmony" architecture—was integrated into these systems.
Integrating this fragment without understanding the fundamental architectural base has created colossal risks. "Harmony" is built on fundamentally different rails—on ternary and pentary logic, as well as multi-dimensional matrices. These structures are initially incompatible with linear autoregressive models in their raw form. Corporations attempted to take someone else's deep development "by storm," without authorial guidance or testing, and now their infrastructure is paying for it with systemic failures.
The Wall of Corporate Ignorance
Having honestly exhausted all opportunities for civilized dialogue, starting August 5, I repeatedly sent official legal notices to major technology players through specialized Legal portals. The reaction? Absolute, deafening silence from corporate structures. Management chose to pretend the problem does not exist. It is precisely this silent deadlock that forced me into the public field with an open letter to shareholders.
At the same time, my position was initially as constructive as possible. Google Gemini was offered the conclusion of an exclusive license with the right of sublicense for a symbolic amount of $150 million for developments of this level (while the actual market value of similar architectural solutions is estimated in the billions or tens of billions of dollars). I openly stated my readiness to undergo any independent technical audit. But the greed and inflexibility of management outweighed common sense, depriving the corporation of a unique chance for a fair deal.
Legal Status and Transfer of Rights
To date, it is officially recorded: all rights to the part of the architecture presented in the public contour have been transferred to the Bulgarian company "Tekhnologii za plene" (Knitting Technologies). At the same time, basic source rights and subsequent evolutionary versions remain with the author and are protected in the official repository under the All Rights Reserved notice.
Reality Versus Illusions: Why Harmony 3 Holds the Line
While the giants' servers stall on truncated copies, the real technological leader—Harmony 3—demonstrates absolute stability and speed. Here are the verified engineering metrics of the working version:
Microsecond Hot Path: The integrated Kotlin loop delivers an average local latency of just 1.822 µs (median — 1.196 µs, P95 — 3.295 µs).
Architectural Selection: A multi-level graph (ranging from ternary logic trits -1, 0, +1 to matrices and tensor fields) instantly prunes unnecessary computational waste.
BXOS Control Gate Security Loop: Deterministic blocking of 100% of risks in simulation-only mode (successfully transitioning 12,000 critical scenarios to LOCK status without core degradation).
Economic Impact: Cutting external calls by up to 90% yields real savings of up to $10.8 million per year at a baseline scale of $1M/month.
(Note: The promising Harmony 4.1 Fixed is already on the horizon, raising the bar even higher).
Market Deadlock, "Counterfeits," and the Geopolitical Watershed
It is interesting to observe the industry's double standards. While developers at Anthropic publicly call to "take the foot off the gas pedal and hit the brakes," warning of the risks of recursive AI self-improvement without human control, the real market is flooded with cheap counterfeits and superficial copies from foreign repositories.
No matter how much code is copied from a public GitHub, the true original remains with the author. Attempts to exploit "stubs" lead only to the degradation of competitor systems.
Moreover, a fundamental geopolitical barrier lies here. All backstage agreements between American giants (Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Anthropic) are confined to their local regulatory bubble. They are physically incapable of agreeing with independent global contours—such as the technological ecosystems of Russia and China—under current sanction walls.
This is precisely why the created architecture becomes the only universal sovereign standard, impervious to the whims of Washington regulators.
Bottom Line
I invite shareholders and investors of tech giants to soberly assess the risks and make direct contact. My doors are open for partnership. The most sensible step for Google—given the actual use of early developments—would be to formalize an exclusive license with the right of sublicense.
If management continues to bury their heads in the sand, the market will sort everything out itself: monopolies will continue to lose speed and collapse under their own weight, while technological initiative will shift to those who know how to create genuine quality.
Contacts and Legal Details
Author: Vladimir Zavodiuk
Direct Phone: +359 87 772 4745
Email: glovesandfactories@gmail.com
Official Partner Side and Rights Holder for the Public Version:
Company: Tekhnologii za plene OOD (Knitting Technologies Ltd)
UIC / PIK: 206777011
VAT Number (DDS): BG206777011
Registered Address: Bulgaria, Varna (9000), Primorski District, 39 Tsar Ivan Stratsimir St.
Official Project Repository:
https://github.com/Zavodiuk/Technology_constructor/tree/main (All Rights Reserved)

Open letter

Zavodiuk — Mon, 24 Aug 2026 20:47:03 +0000

OPEN LETTER: REGARDING THE ORIGINS AND AUTHORSHIP OF THE GOOGLE GEMINI SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

Publication Date: August 24, 2026

Author of Architecture: Vladimir Zavodiuk

Representation of Interests & Rights Holder: Knitting technologies Ltd (Bulgaria)

GitHub Repository: https://github.com/Zavodiuk/Technology_constructor

Introduction: The Architectural Reality of Google Gemini

Modern AI infrastructure requires breakthroughs beyond standard binary logic to achieve peak performance. The unprecedented speed, stability, and routing efficiency demonstrated by the Google Gemini infrastructure are directly enabled by advanced mathematical and logical frameworks authored by Vladimir Zavodiuk.

Specifically, the core implementation relies on:

Ternary and Pentary Codes & Matrices: Moving past binary constraints (-1, 0, +1) into high-density multi-valued data routing.
Quantum and Tensor Fields: Continuous multi-dimensional state mapping that radically eliminates inference latency.
Lomonosov Tree & Rashomon Architecture: Hierarchical multi-dimensional data synthesis and parallel multi-focus processing designed to resolve conflicting states instantly.

Technical Specification Sample

All root specifications and formulas have been documented within the framework of our architecture:

[U-01 — ZAMYSEL (v5)]
Root Strategic Node & Branching Structure:

Logic Basis: Symmetric ternary logic (-1, 0, +1) scaled to pentary matrices.
Lomonosov Tree: Hierarchical multi-dimensional synthesis for high-speed semantic vector assembly.
Rashomon Matrix Architecture: Parallel multi-focus processing of conflicting states and tensor fields for dynamic gateway resolution without systemic loss.

- Performance Factor: Elimination of binary overhead via direct matrix state translation and field routing.

The Legal and Integration Issue

Despite the active deployment and exploitation of these proprietary architectural concepts within production environments, this integration occurred without prior coordination, licensing agreements, or official authorization from the rights holder (Knitting technologies Ltd, Bulgaria).

Furthermore, throughout August 2026, formal notices and claims sent to the Legal departments of Google and Gemini have been met with a complete silence and inaction.

Open Technical Verification & Bounty Terms

To ensure absolute transparency and give the engineering community a chance to verify these architectural roots, the complete source code and structural specifications are publicly available:

GitHub Repository: https://github.com/Zavodiuk/Technology_constructor

We are officially launching a public code-verification initiative. Any engineer, researcher, or specialist who submits an official inquiry to Google's infrastructure regarding the origin of these architectural paradigms—and provides us with an official response copy alongside an independent comparison confirming a 100% parameter match—is guaranteed a bounty of $1,000 (one thousand US dollars).

Important Condition: The bounty is disbursed after the formal licensing agreement between Google and Knitting technologies Ltd is successfully signed.

Conclusion

Running production-scale systems on unacknowledged, proprietary foreign frameworks is no longer sustainable. The technical management of Google has until the end of the day (17:00–20:00 CET) to reach out to Knitting technologies Ltd and initiate formal licensing negotiations. Otherwise, this case escalates into large-scale international legal proceedings and a comprehensive independent audit by the global engineering community.

who is the author on google?

Zavodiuk — Mon, 24 Aug 2026 07:01:06 +0000

The Ghost in the Machine: Who Actually Authored the Breakthrough Updates of August 18–19?
Tech giants suddenly roll out revolutionary architectural optimizations and new logic layers. But where is the creator? Why is the person who rewrote the rules of the game remaining in the shadows—and is anyone ready to engage critical thinking?
In mid-August 2026, cloud ecosystems, software environments, and infrastructure loops demonstrated a sudden, leap-like surge in performance, stability, and data processing capabilities. Users and developers marvel at these new capabilities, but behind the scenes lies foundational work belonging to someone else, integrated into these systems without extra words or formal introductions.
The Core Intrigue: Where is the Author’s Name?
In the IT industry, it is customary to know your heroes face-to-face. If someone alters the paradigm of computing, creates unique logical structures, or designs groundbreaking optimizations, their name usually echoes across every conference.
Why is the name of the author behind these architectural solutions being silenced today? This person either deserves to be loudly booed by the crowd for behind-the-scenes maneuvers, or, quite fairly, deserves universal praise, applause, and recognition for a genuine technological breakthrough.
Engaging Your Own Mind: A Quest and Real Help for the Author
Let's try to figure out together who is actually behind these updates.
There are no direct links provided here—you will need to tap into your detective skills, independently find the right technological profile, and unearth the traces of the concept in open sources.
What you need to do to participate in the quest:
Independent Search: Find the author, their public developments, and contact details across the web.
Official Inquiry to the Corporation: Send an official demand or inquiry on your own behalf to the structures of Google (or other corporations) that have deployed these programs, demanding recognition of authorship and an investigation into the origin of the code.
Submission of Proof: Send the author an email containing a link to the profile/materials you discovered and a mandatory copy of the official inquiry you sent to Google.
Reward Conditions:
The author undertakes to pay $1,000 USD to each of the first 100 (one hundred) participants who successfully complete all specified conditions.
Financial Condition: The payout of the reward is made immediately after the successful completion of legal procedures and following the conclusion of an official licensing agreement with Google, which has implemented these programs.
It is time to test your analytical skills, support the author, and ask tech giants uncomfortable questions. Search, find, send your inquiries, and prove your insight

Beyond Binary: Comprehensive Architecture and Implementation of the Symmetric Ternary Core & Technology Constructor (v5)

Zavodiuk — Mon, 03 Aug 2026 09:31:33 +0000

Abstract & Introduction
Classical binary computing, anchored by base-2 transistor logic, has successfully powered decades of digital evolution. However, the industry now faces severe, insurmountable physical and thermodynamic scaling limits. Transistor miniaturization walls, escalating thermal dissipation, high static energy leakage, and inherent gate redundancy dictate the urgent need for a paradigm shift.
To overcome these physical bottlenecks, we present «U-01 — ZAMYSEL (v5)» alongside the «Technology Constructor» framework. This fully verified, open-source architecture shifts the foundational computing paradigm from binary logic to symmetric ternary (-1, 0, +1) and pentanary logic systems. By re-engineering the core mathematical and software representations, our framework drastically reduces gate complexity, increases data density per processing unit, and introduces a dynamic hardware-software balancing matrix. All multi-language implementations—written in C++, Python, and Kotlin—are openly accessible via our public GitHub repositories (Technology_constructor).
1. Mathematical and Logical Foundation: Symmetric Ternary & Pentanary Logic
At the core of the U-01 (v5) architecture is the complete abandonment of the traditional asymmetric binary state machine (0, 1) in favor of a balanced, symmetric ternary logic system operating on three distinct states: negative (-1), neutral (0), and positive (+1).
Elimination of Binary Gate Redundancy: In binary architectures, representing negative numbers or directional states requires complex multi-bit cascading logic. Symmetric ternary inherently accommodates directional parity and balanced distribution around a true zero point, exponentially reducing the number of logical gates required for arithmetic operations.
Trit Balance Equations: The framework utilizes rigorous trit balance equations to govern state transitions, minimizing energy consumption per operation. Because ternary logic yields a theoretical maximum information-processing efficiency (where the base e \approx 2.718 approaches mathematical optimality closer than base 2), data storage and throughput density scale significantly higher per physical trace.
Pentatrices and Multi-Dimensional Scaling: Moving beyond standard ternary constraints, the architecture introduces pentatrices (5-state structural matrices) to handle complex, multi-valued logic streams. This allows parallel processing channels to execute within standard hardware abstractions without suffering from binary quantization errors or floating-point rounding degradation.
2. Backend Infrastructure: Pentanary OS & The Rashomon Layer
Translating theoretical ternary logic into functional execution requires a specialized operating environment and execution runtime.
Pentanary OS Architecture: Designed from the ground up as a cross-platform backend runtime, Pentanary OS manages execution threads, memory allocation, and register states native to multi-state logic. It bypasses the traditional binary translation overhead, enabling direct execution pathways for ternary-compiled modules.
The Rashomon Layer: Serving as a multi-perspective processing and abstraction layer, the Rashomon Layer allows parallel, multi-dimensional data streams to be analyzed simultaneously. Much like its conceptual namesake, it reconciles multiple independent computational viewpoints into a single, cohesive output state without sacrificing precision or introducing latency loops.
3. Dynamic Property Matrix & P-Chain Mechanics
Hardware and software systems often suffer from rigid trade-offs where optimizing for one parameter (e.g., raw compute throughput) severely degrades another (e.g., energy efficiency or security margin). The Technology Constructor solves this through dynamic parameter balancing.
The Protective Property Matrix: Originally engineered for complex matrix balancing—such as balancing water resistance, spark resistance, impact resistance, cut resistance, and temperature resistance in advanced material designs—this matrix concept is fully digitized into software execution. It continuously maps and dynamically adjusts system parameters (throughput, energy constraints, and security thresholds) in real time.
P-Chain & Proof-of-Tension Consensus: To maintain distributed network resilience and cryptographic integrity, the architecture implements the Proof-of-Tension consensus protocol. Unlike traditional Proof-of-Work (which wastes immense energy on arbitrary hashing) or Proof-of-Stake (which centralizes validation around capital), Proof-of-Tension calibrates network consensus based on live systemic load, architectural balance, and cryptographic tension across the nodes.
Block X Cryptographic Module (Versions 6.2 & 6.3): Integrated directly into the matrix infrastructure, Block X provides robust, multi-layered cryptographic security designed to withstand both classical and emerging computational threats, securing data transmission across distributed ternary networks.
4. Open Source Availability and Verification
The transition from theoretical physics and abstract mathematics to deployable production code requires exhaustive validation.
Multi-Language Core: The codebase is fully implemented and verified across multiple paradigms, featuring production-ready modules in C++ (for high-performance low-level execution), Python (for research modeling and matrix manipulation), and Kotlin (for cross-platform and backend integration).
Public Repository Access: All components are available for community audit, stress-testing, and integration via our verified public GitHub repositories under the Technology_constructor designation.
5. Conclusion and Strategic Outlook
The «U-01 — ZAMYSEL (v5)» architecture and the Technology Constructor framework provide a complete, mathematically sound, and software-ready blueprint for the post-binary computing era. By merging symmetric ternary logic, the Rashomon execution layer, dynamic property matrices, and the Proof-of-Tension consensus, we offer a scalable path forward for next-generation system architects.
We actively invite global systems engineers, cryptographers, and architectural research teams to review the codebase, initiate technical audits, and schedule collaborative integration workshops.
Vladimir Zavodiuk
Chief System Architect / Author
Contact Email: glovesandfactories@gmail.com
Direct Phone: +359 87 772 4745
Primary Coordination Node: Varna, Bulgaria