<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Zarko Nikolic</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Zarko Nikolic (@zaxnick).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/zaxnick</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/zaxnick"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Create Melodies And Chords With AI</title>
      <dc:creator>Zarko Nikolic</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/zaxnick/create-melodies-and-chords-with-ai-534i</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/zaxnick/create-melodies-and-chords-with-ai-534i</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a dev who's been producing electronic music for about 12 years, and the two halves of my brain finally collided into something.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The problem: producers lose enormous amounts of time to the blank piano roll. Not to mixing, not to sound design — to the moment where you have the vibe in your head and no idea what notes to click. Existing tools either generate a whole finished track (useless — nobody wants a song handed to them) or are music theory reference charts (useful but slow).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;MelodyCreator sits in between. Pick key + scale + [complexity/rhythm controls], generate, export MIDI, done. It's a spark, not a song.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The interesting part of building it was that my first instinct was completely wrong. V1 tried to make the output as musically "complete" as possible — proper voice leading, resolved cadences, the works. Every single result was boring. The version that actually clicked went the opposite direction: generate fast, generate rough, give the user control over the parameters, and let them mangle it. The value isn't in the notes. It's in the fact that you're now editing something instead of facing a blank grid.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Link to the website: &lt;a href="https://melodycreator.zarkonik.workers.dev" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;https://melodycreator.zarkonik.workers.dev&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>claude</category>
      <category>programming</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What did you build for one morning?</title>
      <dc:creator>Zarko Nikolic</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 15:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/zaxnick/what-did-you-build-for-one-morning-1nk</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/zaxnick/what-did-you-build-for-one-morning-1nk</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I am curious to see the products that are built for one morning with or without AI helpers. I got one website done for one morning, but idea behind it is more important. Write your ideas and projects in comments. &lt;/p&gt;

</description>
      <category>webdev</category>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>claude</category>
      <category>programming</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
