DEV Community: Zeeve

Could Staking as a Service Be a Bridge Between Institutions and DeFi?

Zeeve — Fri, 03 Oct 2025 06:06:58 +0000

Traditional financial institutions have always gone for safer havens for investments like bonds. But bond yields in developed and developing countries have always remained lower than the prevailing inflation. For example, in 2025, in the US, the bond yields for 5 years stayed at 3.60% – 3.70% in most countries for the last 5 years, while the average inflation stood at 3.5%. Likewise, in the European region, average inflation stood at around 8% while the ROI on bonds stood at around 3.71%.

Due to this, institutions are now looking for alternatives to maximize their yields. In this regard, crypto staking has ended up as an amenable option because almost all major protocols have surpassed what traditional investment vehicles are generating at the moment.

But crypto staking is not as simple as you might be thinking because you have to run nodes to validate the chain to gain returns. For that matter, you need an infrastructure supporting your pursuit. In this blog, we shall deep dive into understanding Staking-as-a-Service, how it works, and why it is trending in 2025. So, without any further ado, let’s get started.

What is Staking-as-a-Service (StaaS)?

Staking-as-a-Service allows crypto holders to delegate tokens to professional node operators without running the whole infrastructure themselves. In traditional staking, an individual locks up their holding to participate in network validation.

This helps the blockchain in maintaining its network security. In return, the holders are given staking rewards. However, to participate in the validation process, holders must set up infrastructure that enables them to run validator nodes. This process can be challenging for many individuals, and the setup costs are also high. This is where StaaS comes to the rescue.

In the StaaS model, a service provider handles all the technical and hardware requirements on your behalf. This includes the complex validator setup and the required maintenance activities. You simply lock your tokens through a web interface or API, and the StaaS provider stakes them into the network. In return, you earn a share of the block rewards, just as if you ran your own validator. That being said, let’s understand how this process works.

How Staking-as-a-Service Works?

Select a StaaS provider: The process begins by choosing a trusted StaaS provider that has the necessary infrastructure to handle the complex requirements.

Delegate tokens: Next, you delegate the desired amount of your tokens to the provider by connecting your wallet. Importantly, the custody of your keys lies with you. This is because the service only requires a validator key and not a withdrawal authority.

Validation: The provider then runs enterprise-level nodes to participate in the network validation of the blockchain. A great Staking-as-a-Service provider constantly monitors the performance of the infrastructure and manages upgrades in real time. They make sure that the node remains online to prevent downtime and any slashing penalties.

Earn rewards: As the blockchain generates new blocks, your delegated stake earns a pro rata share of the block rewards or transaction fees. The StaaS provider keeps back a percentage of the rewards as commission, and you get the majority in your account. These rewards accumulate in your staking account and can be seen in real-time on a dashboard.

Compound staking growth: Once you have received the staking rewards, you can either claim them or they will be automatically re-staked to generate additional returns for you. This way, you will also enjoy the rewards of compounding without putting any effort into it.

The StaaS process is where the real value is. It involves a bunch of complex steps, but a great provider has them automatically streamlined to make the whole experience smooth. The core advantage of StaaS is that your participation in the process is minimal without losing control over your funds.

Why Staking-as-a-Service Could Be A Bridge Between DeFi and Institutions?

So, why is Staas ending up as a bridge between institutions and DEFi? A few reasons driving the shift;

1.Institutional Participation
Several traditional finance players are actively participating in crypto staking. Even major institutions and banks now support PoS staking. For instance, Anchorage Digital, a federally chartered bank in the United States, now offers staking services for institutions.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1957487904399192100-678'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1957487904399192100&theme=dark" }

Additionally, Switzerland’s SEBA Bank provides crypto custody and lending services to its clients globally. Moreover, Coinbase Custody also offers fully secure and compliant staking services.

Several asset managers are also catching up. Canadian fund 3iQ launched a Solana Staking ETF (SOLQ) on the Toronto Stock Exchange in 2025, highlighting demand for staking-backed yield in a regulated space.

https://x.com/3iq_corp/status/1965401650094342215?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1965401650094342215%7Ctwgr%5Eea9b8bacde56f71515e7b149477064682cbc20a6%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zeeve.io%2Fblog%2Fcould-staking-as-a-service-be-a-bridge-between-institutions-and-defi%2F

This institutional momentum suggests that PoS rewards can be a valuable addition to modern investment strategies. One key reason for this increased interest is the current US Government’s positive stance towards crypto. Multiple ETF approvals, the GENIUS Act, and the recent SEC staff statement regarding staking activities are key examples.

Moreover, staking’s additional and predictable returns are becoming an attractive venture for institutions. As a result, fund managers are taking staking as a gateway to diversify portfolios, making it a hot favorite in 2025 for institutions and DeFi bridging. In this pursuit, Staking-as-a-Service has ended up as an amenable solution because it abstracts all the complexities to set up your node and participate for benefits.

2. Staking Yields vs Traditional Finance

An important reason why staking-as-a-Service is attracting more investors is the high yields compared to traditional finance players. For instance, the US 5 Year Note Bond Yield is about 3.68% currently. This fails to beat inflation. Moreover, savings bank interest also hovers around 4-5% annually.

As evident from the graph above, in the last 10 years, the yield that crypto has generated has outsmarted traditional financial instruments like bonds and savings at around 7% and rising, pushing the narrative of staking yield to occupy center stage. With Staking-as-a-Service, institutions are getting the gateway to explore the hidden yields of DeFi in a low-yield traditional bond-bearing environment.

3. Complexity & Compliance

Running validators in-house is challenging, which keeps institutions away from staking. For example, if institutions want to integrate the same, they have to build everything from the ground up, like secure key management, a 24/7 validation system, monitor slashing risk, and meet regulatory KYC/AML audits. Moreover, institutions deal with huge amounts of capital, which increases the stakes and the seriousness regarding the risk of theft.

To outsource these complex yet important tasks, institutions choose StaaS providers. The latter helps them with the infrastructure to minimize technical and regulatory headaches. In addition to this, Staking-as-a-Service also helps in diversifying the use cases of DeFi, where, for the first time, institutions can tap unexplored goldmines like native staking, delegated staking, liquidity staking, and liquidity pool participations, which are advanced use cases attracting major institutions.

That’s why institutions are finding Staas as an effective gateway to explore the profitable realms of DeFi. But when they are doing the same, there are a few things that they should consider firsthand to explore them.

Top Determinants While Choosing a Staking-as-a-Service Provider

Before you make a move to choose a Staking-as-a-Service provider for your staking pursuits, there are a few things that you should look into;

Custody Model: This is a very important factor. The custody of the key should remain with you so that you retain control. Look for a non-custodial StaaS provider that never takes possession of your tokens. This model ensures safety for your funds. For instance, if the infrastructure of the provider is compromised, your funds will remain safe if in your custody.

Security: While selecting a StaaS provider, you must make sure that they use enterprise-grade security measures. Check for industry certifications like SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, etc., and strong operational controls. For instance, you should look for platforms that provide 24/7 security monitoring and tools to manage your nodes. There are several privacy and compliance measures in place, too. In short, your provider should have rigorously audited multi-layer security and provide transparency.

Reliability & Uptime: Validator downtime results in lost rewards and potential slashing. Look for StaaS providers that guarantee 24/7 availability. Top providers deploy nodes across multiple cloud regions with automated failover. This, along with other factors, helps in maintaining a high uptime of 99.5%.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1967606783838388248-510'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1967606783838388248&theme=dark" }

Fees: Then, you must be clear about the commission or fees charged by the StaaS provider. The core reason for staking is to earn returns on your funds. So, a transparent fee structure helps you in deciding whether you should go with a certain provider. Ideally, choose a provider with low commission to maximize your gains.

Support and Reputation: For large delegations, 24/7 support and a solid track record are particularly important. Research the provider’s reputation. Have they run validators for other projects or clients? Do they publicly share their uptime statistics or undergo regular audits? Community feedback can also give insight into the responsiveness and reliability of a provider.

By carefully looking for these factors while choosing a StaaS provider, investors can select a partner that understands their risk profile and supports their needs.

Delegate Your Tokens with Zeeve Staking–as-a-Service

Zeeve’s platform provides a well-engineered Staking-as-a-Service for investors. Here are some key features:

Non-custodial by design: Zeeve never asks for users’ tokens. Investors delegate their tokens from their wallet and maintain complete control of their funds. Zeeve only receives a validator key, not the private key to withdraw funds. You can check Coreum and Babylon.

1-Click Delegation: Just pick a network, choose Zeeve validator, and confirm. That is all you have to do to start earning your staking rewards.

Enterprise-grade infrastructure: Zeeve operates validators with institutional-grade reliability. The stack is SOC2 and ISO-27001 certified, with multi-layered deployment to maintain a 99.5% uptime guarantee.

Low commission: Zeeve charges a commission of 3%, which is the lowest among active validators. So, you retain more rewards to earn high long-term yields.

Transparent systems: Zeeve provides real-time analytics for investors to track important metrics like validator health, commission history, rewards, missed blocks, etc.

24/7 Support: You get constant support and continuous monitoring. For large or institutional delegations, Zeeve offers dedicated support, runbooks, and priority incident channels.

Automatic protocol support: Zeeve is already an active validator on multiple PoS chains. For example, Zeeve runs a Babylon ($BABY) validator on the Cosmos network and a Coreum validator on its BPoS network.

As you can see, Zeeve fulfills all the requirements of a great Staking-as-a-Service provider. It focuses on maintaining a safe, transparent, and reliable platform for investors.

Building RWA Chain with Cosmos SDK: Is It Really a Good Idea?

Zeeve — Tue, 30 Sep 2025 14:51:29 +0000

If you’re engaging with this post, there is a strong chance that either you’re planning to build your sovereign RWA chain or you want to transition your RWA-based dApp from a congested public chain to a custom chain due to its limitations. In this regard, Cosmos SDK has left no stone unturned with more than 20+ RWA chains deployed thus far.

Major financial players are launching their own sovereign L1s by choosing the Cosmos Stack. The recently announced Arc by Circle, which is a purpose-built L1 for stablecoin native finance, has a clear Cosmos lineage. Lombard Finance, Stable, Ondo, Provenance, Mantra, Noble, Coreum, Plume, Nillion, and a dozen more are building on Cosmos SDK for RWA Tokenization.

But what’s making Cosmos SDK the top choice for RWA projects is making them jump to this stack. In order to understand that, you need to first understand the top problems plaguing the RWA space and what Cosmos SDK has done to solve these from the ground up.

The Biggest Challenges of RWA Projects

Below are some of the critical challenges in RWA that hinder its overall growth and adoption for businesses:

1. Limited Customization at compliance level:
What’s needed is programmable compliance—the ability to encode jurisdiction-specific rules, KYC/AML checks, and governance frameworks directly at the protocol layer. Without this, platforms cannot provide the confidence and real-time auditability that regulated institutions demand.

2. Pervasive Security & Bridge Risks:
While generic security concerns like private key manipulation and all do exist, the single most critical vulnerability for RWAs has been cross-chain bridges. The conventional “lock, mint, & burn” model used by third-party bridges creates systemic risks. As per research, RWA protocol exploits have reached $14.6M in H1 2025 alone. These bridges often rely on small, trusted multisigs, creating a centralized point of failure for assets that are supposed to be on a decentralized ledger.

3. Inflexible Validator Setup:
Be it a permissioned, permissionless, or hybrid RWA chain, the network must be given flexibility to set up validators as per their real-time transaction load. Or else, the platform will end up incurring high operational costs while also keeping security at stake.

4. Inefficiency in Tracking & Management:
Without rich on-chain metadata capabilities, proving the link between a digital token and its underlying real-world asset becomes opaque. This increases the risk of fraud and makes auditing incredibly difficult. Ineffective tracking makes it very much difficult to prove the actual ownership of a token, leading to disputes among the holders of the asset.

5. Fragmenting Liquidity:
When an RWA is tokenized on a single chain, its liquidity is trapped. While bridges exist, they create fragmented versions of the same asset (e.g., bridgeUSDC vs. nativeUSDC), increasing risk and complexity for users. Fragmented ecosystems without powerful communication protocols cause asset lockups, trading delays, and reduced economic efficiency.

6. The EVM Incompatibility Dilemma
Most of the existing DeFi liquidity, developer tooling, and user base reside within the EVM ecosystem. RWA projects face a difficult choice: build on an EVM chain and sacrifice sovereignty and customizability, or build a custom chain and risk being isolated from this critical ecosystem. Both impact the liquidity and usability of tokenized assets.

7. Volatile Transaction Fees
Volatile or high transaction fees create a barrier to entry for institutional investors and key players in the RWA ecosystem. High, unpredictable fees make frequent trading, rebalancing, and settlement of tokenized assets economically unviable, hence impacting the widespread adoption.

Complex User Experience Delayed transactions, the need to acquire and hold a separate volatile gas token, failed checkout, and lack of interoperability – all these appchain-level issues, when combined with a confusing UI, discourage users from joining the RWA network, which is a serious issue.

How does Cosmos SDK solve these problems?

Enough of the problems. Let’s now move on to the solutions that Cosmos already offers for RWA projects. Cosmos SDK is powered by capabilities that are highly suitable for customized RWA chains. All the problems that we discussed in the above section have already been tackled by Cosmos SDK.

Let’s understand these solutions and also validate the claims through the Cosmos SDK RWA chains utilizing them:

1.Extended customization with v0.53.0 to match specific compliance needs requirements:
Given that compliance is critical in RWA projects, Cosmos SDK enables extensive customization for network-level permissioning, governance frameworks, and capital flows so that regulatory adherence must be there across jurisdictions. With the release of v0.53.0, builders have greater modularity, the ability to push new features, and seamless legacy upgrades.

Also, recent updates across the stack also bring ABCI 2.0 compatibility (vote extensions, mempool optimizations) and stronger IBC improvements— from v8 to v2. This is useful for asset issuers who need send-restriction hooks and for appchain devs who want cleaner connectivity and upgradability.

Cosmos SDK already supports robust on-chain governance, where native token holders can vote and propose changes through a one-to-one voting system. Capital flows can also be tightly managed using the SDK’s core modules—bank, authz, group, feegrant, governance, and custom middleware—to codify programmable compliance such as role-based transfers, jurisdictional allowlists, asset freeze/unfreeze rules, and real-time reporting.

All the leading RWA chains, including Mantra, Provenance, Noble, Ondo Chain, have been utilizing the customization benefit of Cosmos SDK to maintain compliance for their network.

2. Aggregated Liquidity through cross-L1 Interoperability:
RWA chains in the Cosmos ecosystem benefit from unified liquidity through the IBC-enabled cross-chain connectivity. That means assets issued on any RWA tokenization chain can seamlessly and securely flow across 100+ IBC-enabled chains. Hence, users will be able to access the assets and tokens all across these chains.

Similar to compliance, aggregated liquidity and cross-chain interactions is the reason for all the RWA chains to opt for Cosmos.

Here’s what Coreum says:

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1932112975764361386-92'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1932112975764361386&theme=dark" }

IBC has evolved a lot, too. IBC v2, launched in March 2025, simplifies the protocol, removes complex handshakes, and uses ZK-enabled verification to lower the cost of connecting to expensive execution environments like Ethereum. The Solana integration is also on the roadmap.

The roadmap also includes IBC Attestations, a solution designed to connect with optimistic rollups and other chains that lack light clients. This will ensure the Cosmos ecosystem remains connected to the entire Web3 stack.

Let’s take the example of Novastro. It’s an RWAFi project that enables seamless RWA custody and liquidity by bridging assets from Ethereum via Axelar or Gravity Bridge, routing them through Osmosis AMMs for low-fee swaps, and using CosmWasm smart contracts to integrate oracle feeds, compliance controls, and asset logic.

This kind of complex bridging flow with borderless liquidity and policy control is possible only in Cosmos SDK. And that’s a reusable pattern.

3.Solving the EVM Dilemma:
Founders no longer have to choose between the Cosmos stack and the EVM ecosystem. Chains built with the Cosmos SDK can be fully EVM-compatible.

Let’s take MANTRA Chain for example. They are the “first purpose-built RWA chain that is both EVM-compatible and self-sovereign,” and allow developers to deploy dApps with all the EVM opcodes they know while leveraging MANTRA’s unique compliance infrastructure.

Realio Network, another L1 ecosystem for RWAs, has also gained EVM compatibility by integrating evmOS.

*4. Strong security guarantees- *
Sovereign, application-specific RWA chains built with Cosmos SDK will have strong security enabled through CometBFT and the Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol.

Further, to solve critical security issues like bridging attacks, Cosmos is launching The Gravity Bridge where the bridge needs the validator set to be updated on the Ethereum smart contract by calling the ‘updateValset’ method at least once within each unbounding period, typically every 14-days period.

Read more about the bridge, its mechanism and value addition to Cosmos SDK here.

And, to take this security another level, Cosmos SDK has introduced specific security implications for chain builders where they get to implement ABCI++, Object-Capability Model (Ocap), AnteHandler, Chain Ecosystem Interdependencies and Inherited Risk. These features give developers more granular control over how security is enforced at the protocol level.

Today, many Cosmos RWA chains pair CometBFT finality with IBC Classic → IBC v2 migration paths. It ensures they can scale their security model as interchain connectivity expands. For ecosystems that don’t run Cosmos-style light clients, such as Base, Arbitrum, or Solana, Cosmos is enabling attestation-based IBC clients and conditional clients as mentioned above. These approaches combine data-availability proofs with rollup-state attestations, offering multiple verification models. The result is a flexible balance between speed and security, ensuring that institutional RWA flows can operate with confidence while keeping user experience smooth.

5. Faster time-to-cash:
RWA tokenization chains built with Cosmos SDK benefit from faster time-to-cash, driven by the CometBFT consensus engine and recent performance upgrades.

By design, Cosmos chains are account-based, and with ABCI 2.0 which includes optimized mempools and vote extensions, they deliver lower latency and higher throughput.

For institutions, this translates directly into quicker issuance, redemption, and secondary trading, alongside uninterrupted 24/7 global market access.

The most powerful example of this is Figure Technology, which built the Provenance blockchain using the Cosmos Stack.

Figure has become the largest non-bank HELOC lender in the US, processing over 200,000 loans.
By using Digital Asset Registration Technology (DART) on-chain instead of legacy systems, they offer loan approvals in minutes.
In its public filing, Figure reported $191 million in revenue and $29 million in profit for the first half of 2025. This demonstrates the immense efficiency gains of a purpose-built blockchain.

Another example could be Ondo.

Ondo Finance, with over $1.39B TVL, built Ondo Chain to access faster settlement and programmable compliance for tokenized U.S. Treasuries and lending platforms.

Its Ondo GM platform ties tokenized assets directly to public exchange liquidity, enabling instant redemptions and preventing the dislocations seen in early tokenized equities.
In 2025, Ondo moved ~$95M OUSG collateral into BlackRock’s BUIDL, allowing 24/7 redemptions compared to the traditional T+2 settlement cycle, and is now rolling out tokenized ETF access through its Cosmos-based stack.
These examples highlight how Cosmos SDK’s consensus and execution model enable institutional-grade settlement speed, and position RWA chains to operate at the pace of modern capital markets.

6. Custom validator setup:
Cosmos SDK chains to overcome static or rigid validator setup where on-chain governance allows the chain to include a certain number of validators (depending on the project) to bootstrap your AppChain network and allow it to validate the transactions on the network. With ecosystem expansion, the network must allow more validators to participate in the consensus and help AppChain to ensure security.

Here’s Provenance reiterating the same thesis

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1954936708979421340-59'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1954936708979421340&theme=dark" }

Take Ondo, as another example again. They choose to build on Cosmos precisely for this reason. They have permissioned validator sets, with staking secured by tokenized RWAs rather than volatile crypto assets. This design lets Ondo align with institutional risk management standards, reduce exposure to risks like front-running, and enforce compliance measures directly at the protocol layer. Gas fees on Ondo Chain can also be paid using tokenized assets. This further reduces volatility and aligns with the expectations of financial institutions.

7. Impressive UX for accelerated adoption:
Since the start, Cosmos SDK has been a lot focused on improving the UX. The support for native USD issuance and multiple innovative features with leap wallet is a solid example for this.

While these components are widely popular across all niches, Noble; the RWA chain that has issued $435.1M assets, has been enabling Issuance of native USD to its 6 Blue-chip issuers.

To make this accessible, Noble integrates directly with the Cosmos specific Leap Wallet, and allows users to onboard and transact with simplified flows, familiar UX patterns, and support for multiple issuers. All without needing to navigate through any kind of technical complexity. This ensures that RWA participation feels as seamless as interacting with familiar fintech products.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1686772874600759298-549'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1686772874600759298&theme=dark" }

8.Specialized modules for Asset Tracking and Token Transparency:
Cosmos SDK offers production-grade modules that RWA chains can use to enable high level systems for metadata management and ownership tracking. With complete transparency, it’s easier for users as well as investors to participate in the network without any confusion or doubt for its sustainability.

Provenance (we already mentioned) that has $42b+ in transactions, $16.9b+ in active loan TVL, 79% of the private credit market in Web3, and 65+ Network Validators, has employed these Cosmos SDK-powered modules for metadata and ownership tracking. This is critical for loans and mortgage assets and adds trust and transparency to its ecosystem.

Though we’ve highlighted specific Cosmos SDK RWA chains for each feature/RWA solution, the names are not of course not limited to these. Other innovative RWA chains that are building and thriving with this appchain stack includes Neutron, Figure, Swift, Japan, Europe, The U.S., Joltify Finance, Injective, Commercio, Network, Titan, Stargaze (NFTs and social tokens), Chihuahua (community-driven NFTs). Plus, a lot of projects are on its way to launch on the Cosmos ecosystem in 2025 & beyond.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1963485601023590416-231'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1963485601023590416&theme=dark" }

Ready to thrive with your RWA chain? Do it with Zeeve’s AppChain Infra

Now that you have a clear picture about what challenges Cosmos SDK has been tackling and why so many RWA chains have chosen this appchain stack, your next step will probably be to plan your chain. On this step, Zeeve helps RWA projects to deploy and scale it to meet enterprise-grade standards.

As the leading AppChain-as-a-Service provider, Zeeve engineered and deployed both the testnet and mainnet infrastructure for multiple CDK chains—ensuring stability, high availability, and zero-friction onboarding for developers and businesses alike. Here’s a snapshot of what Zeeve Provides:

Fully managed testnet deployment.
High-availability infra.
TraceHawk Explorer integration.
Future-ready mainnet scaling.

For more information on our services and appchain support, connect with our experts and get a detailed walkthrough.

Why the Next Telecom Infra Evolution Needs Web3 — and Why Binary’s Avalanche L1 Could Be the Blueprint?

Zeeve — Fri, 26 Sep 2025 09:24:35 +0000

Telecommunication has always been a story of scale. millions of users, billions in revenue, and some of the most deeply embedded infrastructure in our daily lives. But when it comes to innovation—real, paradigm-shifting innovation—the industry has been surprisingly slow to evolve. Even when hardware evolved and 5G towers rose, the way telcos engage users has barely changed. It’s still transactional. It’s one-way. And more often than not, it ends with just a bill.

For a sector that touches billions of lives daily, the lack of evolution in user engagement, monetization, and financial inclusion is stark. Even in Web3, where decentralization is meant to shatter barriers, telecom remains largely out of sync. Attempts to bring blockchain into telco apps often stop at SIM-linked wallets, token-based recharge offers, etc.

That’s where The Binary Holdings (TBH) enters. Their approach isn’t about layering crypto on top of telecom. They rebuilt the infrastructure stack that is the centrepoint of user engagement within telco apps, the loyalty point program.

And now, they’re moving that Web3 Telecom infrastructure on Avalanche L1 using Cogitus by Zeeve.

With a user base of 169 million from Southeast Asia, Binary is leading the push to make Web3 Telecom a scalable, meaningful category.

But this isn’t just a telecom story. It’s a story of mass adoption also. A model that proves Web3 isn’t just for crypto-native builders, but for mobile-native billions. If you’re building Web3 telecom infrastructure that actually wants to scale, this chain might be your new reference design.

The Real Problem with Telecom Infrastructure in Web2 — and Web3

Let’s get honest about the issues first.

In Web2, telecom apps are static and transactional. The UX is stale. Engagement is minimal. There’s zero incentive to open the app unless you have to. For telcos, that means missed revenue, limited retention, and no real customer ecosystem.

In Web3, the problems are the opposite. The innovation is wild, but the friction is higher. Wallets, bridges, gas, private keys — it’s not just unfamiliar, it’s intimidating. And while Web3 devs build some of the most creative experiences in tech, most of their apps struggle to reach mainstream users because the distribution model is broken. If you don’t already use crypto, you’re locked out.

Now, stack the two problems together, and it’s clear why a bridge was needed. Not a metaphorical one — a real, integrated layer where user intent meets digital opportunity, without switching platforms or changing behavior.

The Binary Holdings (TBH) saw that gap, and they filled it with Web3 Telecom Infrastructure on Avalanche L1, and seamlessly connected telecom users to blockchain ecosystems.

“Telecom is an unconventional yet critical category that Web3 can cater to — and Binary has set the precedent. Their Avalanche L1 is a blueprint for enterprise-grade distribution, monetization, and on-chain service delivery at mobile scale. We’re excited to work with them again in bringing this new chain to life,”

Dr. Ravi Chamria, Co-founder and CEO of Zeeve.

How The Binary Holdings Is Bringing Web3 in the Phones of 169M+ Telecom Users?

Binary Holdings is building The Binary Network: a full-scale, production-ready blockchain designed to become the Web3 distribution layer for global telecom providers.

But what sets them apart is not just the technology. It’s their model.

Instead of asking users to download wallets, bridge funds, or understand tokenomics, Binary meets them where they already are—inside their telcom apps.

Imagine this: Your mobile carrier app has a playstore like interface. When you open it to check your data plan, instead of just a dashboard and a payment button, you see tokenized asset investments, loyalty NFTs, or even on-chain mini-games, with all activity rewarded in $BNRY tokens that can be redeemed for data or airtime.

This seamless experience is powered by Web3 Telecom Infrastructure on Avalanche L1, and enables blockchain integration within everyday telecom apps.

Binary’s telco partners—spread across Southeast Asia (namely Indonesia and Phillipines) for now and covering over 169 million users—are embedding The Binary Network into their existing infrastructure. That means Web3 isn’t a separate experience. It’s native.

Users can invest in real estate through fractional tokenization. Access DeFi tools for earning yield. Participate in DAO votes for app-level decisions. Or simply earn $BNRY by using telco services they were already going to use anyway.

And because it’s all backed by an Avalanche Layer1, the platform doesn’t rely on external bridges or centralized gateways. It’s composable, interoperable, secure by design, and showcases the power of Web3 Telecom Infrastructure on Avalanche L1 to drive mass adoption.

Why is Avalanche L1 the right move for Web3 Telecom Infrastructure?

Binary Holdings began its journey on the OP Stack—leveraging Ethereum’s scalability frameworks to launch a powerful Layer 2 experience. And to their credit, it worked.

Binary’s success with OP Stack proved product-market fit. But as their ecosystem evolved, so did the requirements. To scale further, they needed more — more control, more scalability, more sovereignty, greater customization. And an environment where appchains could be tuned for telecom-grade performance across diverse user bases and regulatory zones.

This shift necessitated Web3 Telecom Infrastructure on Avalanche L1 to meet web2-scale demands with unparalleled flexibility. The Avalanche L1 architecture offers The Binary Holdings what most modular chains can’t: customizable virtual machines, sub-second finality, native multichain support, and near-infinite scalability for high-volume consumer interactions.

In other words, the kind of infra muscle you need when your target audience is not 1M crypto users, but 1B mobile subscribers.

More importantly, Avalanche gave Binary the design space to turn their vision into a telecom-native chain, not just a Web3-native one. Their Avalanche L1 now has complete flexibility to support tokenized asset marketplaces, advanced loyalty mechanics, dApp distribution channels, staking programs, and future pathways to launch subnets for region-specific regulatory compliance.

With this shift to Avalanche L1, The Binary Holdings didn’t just upgrade their stack. They upgraded their ambition to build a Web3 Telecom Infrastructure on Avalanche L1 chain that’s not only tailor-made but also future-proof.

Why They Chose Zeeve for the Transition

“Zeeve has been with us since our OP Stack days — but with Avalanche L1, the ambition and complexity scaled up gradually. Their Cogitus platform allowed us to rapidly migrate from old infrastructure to Avalanche L1, with the performance guardrails and security guarentees we needed for telecom. Our partnership has co-engineered the backbone for everything TBH is building in Web3 Telecom Infrastructure today,”
Manit Parikh, CEO of The Binary Holdings.

This wasn’t Binary’s first deployment. Their OP Stack Layer 2 was also supported by Zeeve Rollups-as-a-Service, and when it came time to build their Avalanche L1, they didn’t look elsewhere because they didn’t need to.

Zeeve has already proven itself in navigating the complexities of launching, monitoring, and upgrading Web3 infrastructure in production. But Avalanche is a different beast. L1s require deeper orchestration, validator bootstrapping, customized consensus configurations, and region-specific compliance guardrails.

When the Avalanche shift was planned, Zeeve stepped in with its Cogitus platform, a dedicated Avalanche L1 launcher, delivering end-to-end infrastructure for their new L1 chain with zero friction. From testnet to mainnet, Cogitus provided the full Avalanche L1 lifecycle support, including:

Chain deployment with tailored virtual machine configurations
CI/CD pipelines for regular updates without downtime
TraceHawk block explorer for fast, reliable insights into transactions, block data, and L1 network activity.
Developer dashboards and analytics for app partners
Security infrastructure aligned with ISO27001 and SOC2 standards
Integrated explorers, faucets, and RPC endpoints for each environment

Infrastructure migrations are never easy, especially when they touch millions of users, telecom-grade SLAs, and mission-critical systems. The Binary Holdings needed a partner who could not only handle the technical lift but also understand the nuances of web3 Telecom infrastructure on Avalanche L1 stack.

Validator provisioning, full-node orchestration, VM configuration, staking support, custom APIs, and performance monitoring are all handled under Zeeve’s enterprise-grade SLA. More than just deployment, Cogitus powered by Zeeve provided The Binary Holdings with a foundation to build new business models.

More than just an infra upgrade, it was a business-critical transformation enabled by the right stack and the right partner.

There’s a lesson here—and it’s bigger than telecom.

We’ve spent a decade building tools for web3 natives. But the next billion users? They’re not coming from Discord. They’re coming from telco apps, mobile banking platforms, social commerce wallets, and offline communities that never opted into Web3—but are ready to benefit from it.

The Binary Holdings is rebuilding the market’s rails from the inside. And they’re doing it in a way that aligns with how people already interact with value. Their Avalanche L1 is a service chain. Designed to carry dApps, incentives, and assets to a mobile-first world. Web3 Telecom Infrastructure on Avalanche L1 is how that delivery system comes to life.

If you’re building anything remotely tied to real-world usage—whether that’s RWA tokenization, Web3 user acquisition, or cross-border transactions—you need to think about where the distribution is. And increasingly, it’s going to be chains like TBH’s that hold the keys.

And if you’re planning to launch your own Avalanche L1? You need infra partners who’ve been through this before. Who understands both frameworks, like OP Stack and Avalanche L1s. Who knows how to go from concept to scale without leaving holes in security, compliance, or observability.

Zeeve is that partner. Talk to us. Let’s build your Avalanche L1 next!

PandaSea Launches Avalanche L1 Mainnet to Turn Sports Fandom into a Yield-Generating Market

Zeeve — Fri, 26 Sep 2025 06:44:36 +0000

Sports is one of the biggest passion economies on earth. Billions of fans watch, argue, and spend around the teams they love, but for decades, that energy has been siphoned into extractive betting slips or centralized platforms that give nothing back. You wager, you lose or win, and either way, the value disappears. There’s no ownership, no compounding, no chance for fans to hold a stake in the outcome they helped create.

PandaSea was born out of a simple provocation: what if sports weren’t a dead-end gamble, but an investable asset class? What if every match, every performance, every league table shift could be financialized as a tradable position, liquid, transparent, and yielding value back to the community that powers it?

Today, that idea ships to production. PandaSea’s Avalanche L1 mainnet, deployed with Cogitus by Zeeve, is live, and with it comes TheSportExchange (TSE) — the first marketplace that turns live sports into a yield-generating economy.

The Problem: The Extractive Game of Sports Betting

The global sports wagering market is built on an extractive model. It thrives on opaque odds and high fees, locking fans into a cycle of short-term speculation with no possibility of building lasting value. Fan participation is reduced to a simple win-or-lose transaction, while the real financial upside is captured by intermediaries.

Meanwhile, DeFi has built immense liquidity machines, but almost none tied to cultural passion points like sports.

This mismatch created a vacuum,

For Sports Fans: a global passion economy with no lasting instruments of ownership
For the Crypto Ecosystem: a DeFi stack searching for relatable, real-world markets.

PandaSea was born from the realization that this model was not just inefficient; it was fundamentally unfair. The team set out to reimagine the structure from the ground up, using DeFi mechanics to convert fleeting bets into ownable, tradable assets that reward fans for their knowledge and loyalty.

What PandaSea Does Differently?

PandaSea reimagines sports not as wagers, but as programmable markets. At the center is TheSportExchange, where fans buy blockchain-based “keys” tied to real teams. These keys don’t expire at the whistle. They sit on bonding curves that guarantee liquidity, appreciate when demand rises, and accrue bonus yield from league-specific pools funded by platform turnover.

Every transaction flows through PANDA, the chain’s native token. Each trade, each key, each bonus payout contributes to automated PANDA buybacks, creating deflationary pressure directly linked to usage. Through a Hyperliquid-style mechanism, 0.56% of every transaction is directed into daily PANDA buybacks to ensure continuous, organic demand tied directly to platform activity.

The idea is bigger than sports, though. PandaSea’s architecture supports DeFi Liquidity Vaults (DLVs), programmable vaults that tokenize exposure to real-world assets like gold, energy capacity, social reputation, and make them liquid, yield-bearing, and redeemable. Sports is simply the first, most intuitive proof point. If it works where passion is highest, it can scale everywhere.

This new model creates a powerful economic flywheel:

Own a piece of every action
Earn real yield
A self-sustaining economy

And the traction is already there. TheSportExchange is fully built and live with USDp, a collateralized stablecoin for transactions. Premier League and La Liga promotions are lined up. Airdrops have seeded more than 100 million PANDA into communities. And in October, TSE will debut publicly with a gamified airdrop and $2 million presale campaign.

“We believe that value creation should equal value participation. Traditional sports markets extract value from fans, while we empower them to own it. This mainnet launch is the first step in a larger mission to build programmable, decentralized markets for all forms of real-world value.”

Why Avalanche L1 Was the Only Choice?

To build a financial market for sports, you need infrastructure that can handle the pace of the game. High-frequency microtransactions, real-time price updates, and instant settlement aren’t optional—they’re essential. PandaSea needed a blockchain that delivered raw throughput without sacrificing decentralization or control.

Avalanche L1 provided the perfect foundation. Building a sovereign Layer 1 gave PandaSea its own economic zone with:

Dedicated Throughput: Sub-second finality and low-cost micro transactions capable of supporting a high-volume consumer marketplace.
Custom Economics: The ability to use the native PANDA token for gas fees, creating a closed-loop economy where all activity reinforces the core ecosystem.
Full Sovereignty: The independence to build custom DeFi primitives like bonding-curve market makers and DAO governance directly into the chain level, without being constrained by a shared network.

PandaSea wanted to mirror the real-time intensity of live matches. It needed its own dedicated chain, and Avalanche provided the performance, security, and customizability to make it a reality.

What Cogitus by Zeeve Delivered?

Launching a new financial market requires more than a vision; it demands utility-grade infrastructure with zero tolerance for failure. PandaSea needed a partner who could translate their ambitious design into a production-ready, globally scalable L1. That’s where Cogitus by Zeeve came in.

Zeeve managed the end-to-end deployment and now runs the full infrastructure stack for the PandaSea Chain, ensuring it operates under pressure with institutional-grade reliability

Zeeve’s role included:

End-to-end Avalanche L1 deployment, optimized for high-frequency marketplace flows
Dedicated, low-latency RPC endpoints for TheSportExchange and partners
24×7 automated monitoring with enterprise-grade SLAs
TraceHawk Explorer integration for real-time transparency and auditing
Scalable node orchestration and CI/CD pipelines to upgrade without downtime
Security architecture aligned with SOC2 and ISO27001 standards

With Zeeve managing the complexities of the underlying infrastructure, the PandaSea team can focus on what they do best: building the future of real-world asset markets.

“Launching a new asset class demands an enterprise-grade foundation of trust and reliability. We engineered every component of PandaSea’s L1 for the speed, data integrity, and uptime needed to power a real-time, global sports economy. This is the kind of mission-critical infrastructure Cogitus was built to deliver.“

Dr. Ravi Chamria, Co-founder & CEO, Zeeve

Sports Was Only the Beginning!

With the core infrastructure now live, PandaSea is rolling out user-created investment pools and gamified experiences to onboard millions of mainstream fans. The roadmap extends far beyond sports, with plans to launch programmable markets for gold, energy, and social influence.

TheSportExchange is already in invite-only pre-buying mode, with public launch coming in October. The first 1000 participants can claim early access using this exclusive link.

For builders, PandaSea’s launch is proof that real economies can move on-chain when the right stack and the right infrastructure partner align. If you’re ready to transform your industry into a programmable market, Cogitus by Zeeve has already made it possible.

Talk to Zeeve. Your Avalanche L1 could be next!

Why Avalanche L1s Could Be the Finance Industry’s Breakout Bet This Year?

Zeeve — Tue, 23 Sep 2025 11:05:52 +0000

Avalanche L1s are roaring post the 9000 upgrade because now customization can be done at a granular level to support industry-specific needs. In our previous post, we saw how these upgrades motivated the mobility sector to choose Avalanche L1s. In this piece, we’ll see how this stack has been identified as a game changer for the finance sector, including the CeFi and DeFi space. For specific information, we’ll directly dive into the top CeFi and DeFi L1s that are building on Avalanche, understanding what exactly encouraged them to choose this appchain stack. So without any further ado, let’s get started.

Avalanche L1 for Finance: Motivations Driving Different Projects To Build With this L1 Stack

From the vantage point, most of the finance-based projects often look for compliance, scalability, security, and performance in any stack for custom chains. But, new-age finance projects look for way more than this. Avalanche L1s are delivering that to CeFi and DeFi to get motivated to choose it as a go-to layer for development. Let’s look at a few projects around the CeFi and DeFi category to understand this;

Avalanche L1s stack is the go-to choice for world-class CeFi projects but why: A Project Oriented POV

Top CeFi companies in mainstream categories have opted Avalanche L1 as their appchain stack to build a sovereign chain that can match their changing business needs and meanwhile match with the current standards of the finance industry. Let’s dive deeper:

1.Institutional Payments:

Institutions are looking for a few things to be assured upfront while using blockchain technology like speed and settlement, programmability, global reach and interop. Avalanche L1s are purpose built for that because you can integrate access controls, specify accountability and auditability. That’s why these CeFi players around institutional payments chose Avalanche L1s;

- Onyx by JP Morgan & Chase Co.
JP Morgan & Chase Co., the prominent global financial holding company, is using Avalanche’s custom, permissionless Evergreen subnet for their Onyx platform. The launch aims to embrace web3 strategy to streamline their repo operations & settlement. The platform is currently used by major financial institutions like Goldman Sachs, DBS Bank, and BNP Paribas. JP Morgan has picked Avalanche Subnet for the following core reasons:

Representing all the investments as tokenized funds to standardize plus automate the funding, order execution, and settlement for both their traditional asset classes and alts required a purpose built stack for meeting best outcomes.
Increased efficiency and scalability through deployment of smart contracts that represent discretionary portfolios that are easily programmable.
Avalanche L1’s seamless integration with 3rd party services has allowed the chain to include Account Abstraction concepts through Biconomy’s Paymaster service. This has abstracted the complexities related to payment and transaction fee settlement
Complete sovereignty dedicated throughout to process 100M+ annual B2B payment transactions.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1724759494641455507-774'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1724759494641455507&theme=dark" }

- ANZ’s Subnet:
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ), which serves over 8.5 million customers across nearly 30 markets, collaborated with Chainlink to improve the settlement of tokenized assets using an Avalanche L1. By integrating Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) with

Speaking about this, Anurag Soin- the Product Lead Digital Added Services at ANZ said, “Avalanche’s Evergreen Subnets have allowed ANZ to join the list of institutions exploring new use cases and business models while leveraging customizable networks like Avalanche.”

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1769715239829008565-833'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1769715239829008565&theme=dark" }

Below are the main reasons that encouraged to opt for ANZ utilized its own Avalanche L1:

Here are the reasons that encouraged ANZ to build with Avalanche:

Smooth integration and interaction with Ethereum-based assets.
Secure, efficient, and tailored transaction processes with permissioning and Custom Gas Token.
Simplified cross-chain DvP settlements through atomic transactions.
Zero backend complexities to provide a seamless frontend experience for users.

2. Asset and Investment Management:

Projects that are built for asset and investment management often face challenges such as adding fine-grained permissions in the smart contract, customizing the validator setup, ensuring secure and compliant operations, and most importantly to achieve interoperability with the legacy systems and infrastructure. Avalanche L1 stack is designed to address all these shortcomings and a number of additional benefits. Here’s how the below mentioned projects used Avalanche L1s in their best of capabilities to overcome challenges;

Inversion Capital Inversion Capital has been tackling one of crypto’s biggest challenges, which is adoption, by using Avalanche’s Layer 1 (L1) capabilities. With this, Inversion aims to transition their traditional businesses onto blockchain rails, bringing its 1B+ users on-chain.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1914347754291069413-948'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1914347754291069413&theme=dark" }

To put it in a nutshell, below are the key reasons Inversion Capital launched their own Avalanche L1:

Avalanche enables Inversion to apply permissions across multiple levels—be it validators, smart contract deployers, or transactions.
Avalanche’s support for wallet and transaction privacy through eERC20 standards safeguards users’ confidentiality on Inversion while maintaining the adherence to ERC standards.
EVM compatibility helps Inversion to attract more developers and assets.
Native Interoperability of Avalanche allows Inversion to seamlessly integrate existing systems and build critical infrastructure.
With the Avalanche9000 network upgrade, Avalanche L1’s launch and management has been effortless and cost-efficient for Inversion; no more a 2000 AVAX compulsion to launch their own validator sets.
With customization in gas and staking fees and tokens, Inversion gets the flexibility to creatively establish its validator set while adding real utility and value to its native token.

3. Liquidity:

Liquidity-focused projects seek to tackle key issues, such as fragmented liquidity pools spread across multiple chains, causing inefficient markets and higher slippage. High transaction fees and slow processing inhibit active trading and reduce liquidity provider motivation;thereby, deleting a lot of use cases like perps, money markets and CLOB based models. Additionally, limited access to asset classes, coupled with regulatory hurdles impacts participation, especially from institutional players. Also, security concerns impact user trust in liquidity solutions. By creating their own Avalanche Layer 1, these projects seek to unify liquidity, lower costs, increase transaction speed, enhance incentives, and ensure regulatory compliance to build deeper, more efficient, and accessible liquidity ecosystems.

Dinari Finance
Dinari Finance, the leader in offering tokenized U.S. public securities, has launched its Avalanche L1 chain to achieve omni-chain liquidity and seamless settlement for all the Dinari’s partner networks. Dinari manages 25K+ customers and 150+ assets across top 80 countries.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1962259102773428341-256'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1962259102773428341&theme=dark" }

A sovereign L1 allows Dinari Financial Network to be compatible with diverse blockchain environments through the omni chain capability while Avalanche offers the underlying consensus layer for sub-second finality, automation of compliance, and network’s composability across various DeFi and institutional partners.

This launch represents a foundational milestone toward enabling scalable, secure, and regulated round-the-clock trading of U.S. equities. It allows investors globally to access capital markets through a unified, transparent infrastructure layer. Similar to the DTCC’s role in traditional finance, Dinari’s blockchain is designed to uphold standards and facilitate settlement via a neutral coordination layer—tailored to meet the demands of modern markets.

4. Asset Management:

Asset Management solutions are booming in finance, but at the same time, they face challenges such as scalability bottlenecks, high transaction fees, lack of interoperability, limited privacy, and rigidity in customizing blockchain parameters. Avalanche Layer 1 solves these by offering high throughput and near-instant transaction finality, reducing latency and costs critical for active asset management. Its native interoperability facilitates seamless integration with other blockchains, improving liquidity access. Let’s see how projects in asset management category have been utilizing this stack:

IntainMarkets
Intain Inc, the global platform in structured finance and administration earlier launched its Avalanche Subnet (now Avalanche L1); IntainMarkets. Intain manages a huge ecosystem with 240K loan reviews and $23B deals onboarded on the platforms. With IntainMarkets, Intain Inc. has been able to solve complex finance-related challenges while fulfilling the regulatory and other application-specific requirements that are integral to sustain in a market that has created 2T of asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities in 2022 (as per SIFMA).

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1620437071478362112-862'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1620437071478362112&theme=dark" }

Besides the key features; compliance and customization, the major benefit that Intain gets from Avalanche is fast transaction processing. Through the traditional off-chain approach, the platform has made some sub-$100M transactions which were prohibitively expensive. Now with an on-chain platform will enable IntainMARKETS to make $8–10 million transactions while maintaining economic viability.

Avalanche L1s are Equally Suitable for DeFi Chains as well

DeFi projects that are leading in the current space; either by TVL, innovative features, unique offerings, user trust, and so on, have already opted to build with Avalanche L1 stack. Below are the top DeFi projects are thriving with this appchain stack amid the challenges in the finance industry:

1.Trading, Exchange & Investment:

Avalanche Layer 1 is an ideal stack for decentralized exchanges to achieve flexible TPS, fast finality, reduced latency and optimized trading costs critical for active markets. Its unique multi-chain architecture (X-Chain, C-Chain, P-Chain) optimizes different blockchain functions such as asset creation, smart contract execution, and staking coordination, improving efficiency. Here’s how Dexalot L1 and Watr is doing this:

Dexalot L1

Dexalot, the popular non-custodial and omni-chain DEX that handles 964M+ transactions and $31.5B+ trades in volume, has been operating its Layer-1 chain powered by Avalanche to bring sub-second execution of trades similar to centralized exchanges but on-chain. The L1 currently has a TVL of $4.11M, 6.045 TPS, and total transactions as 359.36M. With Avalanche L1, Dexalot get the following capabilities:

Ultrafast transaction finality.
Intuitive UI/UX.
Reduced Slippage.
Full possession of assets to users.
Integration with messaging passing protocol; LayerZero.
Greater efficiency for cross chain operations because of Avalanche Wrap Messaging.
Hybrid architecture to deposit assets on the Avalanche C-Chain and trade them on the L1.

Watr
Watr; the purpose-built blockchain infrastructure with a $20 Trillion global economy has confirmed its migration to an Avalanche L1-powered sovereign chain to align with the DeFi future.

Regarding this, Maryam Ayati, the Founder and President of Watr Foundation mentioned, “Established Web3 concepts such as DeFi, Decentralized Identity, and smart contracts can address fundamental constraints in commodity financing, compliance, and trade,” said “Building with Avalanche allows us to leapfrog the development cycle and leverage its ecosystem’s size and security to decisively take on this opportunity.”

Avalanche L1 provides Watr the following abilities to make a difference across the commodities and trading industry:

Untapped Liquidity
Programmable smart contracts for automated trade execution and risk tackling.
Reduced fraud through Trust-based, identity-based transactions.
Enhanced compliance and provenance, and sustainability into trade.
Ability to move liquid capital and finance assets moving at lightning fast speed.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1620800064536064000-556'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1620800064536064000&theme=dark" }

2. Derivatives and Collateral Management:

Avalanche Layer 1 solves critical challenges for derivatives trading and collateral management by enabling high-speed, low-cost transactions essential for timely execution and settlement. Its multi-collateral support allows traders to use various assets as collateral, improving flexibility and risk management. Avalanche’s native multi-chain architecture optimizes transaction processing, enabling efficient leverage trading, hedging, and position management. Here’s how Blocktcity is achieving benefits from Avalanche L1:

Blockticity
Blockticity, the blockchain platform for securing global trade operations and documents has officially launched a Layer-1 chain powered by Avalanche. By doing this, Blockticity achieves a major milestone of migrating 45K+ COAs (Certificates of Authenticity) to its dedicated Avalanche-powered chain integrated with compliance. All these digital certificates contribute to 1.2B+ in authenticated, real-world goods.

Blockticity L1 has been serving as a powerful verification layer for the protocol as it ensures documents are AI-verifiable, standards-aligned, and tamper-evident. The L1 has 776.53K + total transactions and it offers quick transaction processing with 0.011 TPS. Also, Blockticity’s integration with LayerZero has enabled a highly composable infra for AI-native authentication of trades.

3.Loyalty & User Engagement:

Loyalty and user engagement solutions are another DeFi use case that get impacted from issues like fragmented loyalty ecosystems, lack of transparency, limited interoperability, and inefficient reward distribution. Avalanche Layer 1 addresses these by enabling secure, scalable, and cost-efficient blockchain infrastructure that empowers brands to tokenize loyalty points and customer data. Here’s how QChain is doing this:

QChain (by Quboid)
Quboid, the full-stack platform for loyalty, rewards, and automated campaigns has built its dedicated Layer1 for loyalty ecosystems. Powered by sovereign architecture, scalability, and speed,

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1843315391998869893-193'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1843315391998869893&theme=dark" }

QChain is designed to offer a gasless experience so that users can engage in the network without getting bothered to pay transaction fees. With Avalanche L1, the chain offers a lightning-fast, secure, and efficient TPS experience with 0.05TPS, 7.70M+ transactions, 19K+ transactions.

Plus, the sovereign chain gives Quboid the full autonomy to unlock greater potential to accelerate innovation for their business.

4. Prediction Market:

Prediction Market is a highly sensitive and volatile finance niche, where security and compliance is of utmost importance. Avalanche Layer 1 supports prediction markets by providing a high-throughput, low-latency, and cost-efficient blockchain infrastructure that ensures fast transaction finality and smooth user experience. Its scalability allows platforms to handle millions of daily on-chain transactions without congestion or high fees, critical for real-time forecasting.

TradeXMarkets
TradeXMarkets, the leading platform designed for prediction and trading, has launched their custom prediction market on a custom chain built as Avalanche L1. TradeXMarkets utilizes this network to process its 50K+ daily on-chain transactions and it has total 2.29M+ transactions to date.

“Prediction markets have long been an untapped segment in decentralized finance (DeFi), and TradeX Markets is here to change that,” said Indrajeet Roy, Co-founder of TradeX Markets. “With a custom-built Avalanche L1, we’re providing users with a seamless, trustless experience, empowering them to forecast events with unparalleled speed and efficiency.”

Following are the key reasons that encouraged TradeXMarkets team to choose Avalanche L1:

Quick launch and effortless management of the L1 chain through Avacloud.
Ability to handle heavy daily transaction load (50K+).
Instant execution and faster settlements.
Ultra- low fee to offer fair participation for users.
Greater scalability even during high network congestion.
Enhanced security & compliance through customization.

If you want to launch your purpose built Avalanche l1 chain, you need the support of experts. And that’s where Zeeve’s role comes into fruition;

Planning Avalanche L1 for your finance project? Do it with Zeeve

Zeeve has a proven track record for successful launch of 15 + Avalanche L1s on its own managed infrastructure. These chains are from major industries, including DeFi, Gaming, AI, healthcare, general-purpose, and more. So, if you are planning to build your own purpose-built Avalanche L1 for finance, Zeeve can help, from rapid node & network setup to RPC configurations to validator node settings, integrations, and more.

For customization, Zeeve offers overc integration partners that we bring on Zeeve. Also, your L1 will be continuously monitored on an intuitive dashboard 24/7 to ensure performance and maintenance.

So, if you have any specific requirements that you want to integrate with your Avalanche L1 node, you can readily use them. Moreover, Cogitus will further amplify the development experience. Planning to set-up your next Avalanche L1 node, why wait? Write to us your requirements or set up a one-on-one call with our experts, where we can provide you with an Avalanche L1 demo.

Best Arbitrum Orbit Rollup Provider for Enterprise Solutions

Zeeve — Thu, 11 Sep 2025 06:12:29 +0000

Enterprises looking to deploy custom blockchains need a balance of performance, compliance, uptime, and flexibility. Arbitrum Orbit offers a proven framework to build dedicated rollups, while providers like Zeeve ensure they are production-ready with enterprise-grade reliability.

This article explains why Orbit is suited for enterprises and why Zeeve is the best provider to deliver those requirements.

What Arbitrum Orbit has to offer for Enterprises?

Arbitrum Orbit is the customizable rollup framework on top of Nitro. For enterprises, three traits matter above the rest.

First, Orbit gives you dedicated, predictable capacity. You are not sharing blockspace with unrelated applications, so your throughput and latency remain stable during campaigns, partner launches, and seasonal peaks. Parameters can be tuned to your transaction profile rather than averaged for a public L2.

Second, Orbit gives you meaningful control over data availability. You can operate in full rollup mode and post data to Ethereum for maximal assurance, or you can adopt AnyTrust’s Data Availability Committee (DAC), where a committee of known entities signs for availability. That choice can reduce cost and still preserve safety through a fallback to L1 posting if the committee fails. This is the lever that lets cost-sensitive, high-TPS programs — loyalty, ticketing, IoT events — scale without destroying budgets.

Third, Orbit preserves EVM familiarity and integration surface. Solidity, common dev tooling, indexers, explorers, ABI conventions, and operational playbooks all carry forward. That reduces delivery risk and shortens the path from POC to production. Access control is flexible: permissionless or permissioned, allowlists for RPC, private endpoints for back-office systems, and governance hooks that can evolve from managed sequencing to more distributed models as policy changes.

This means enterprises can set the trust, cost, and performance posture they need today, and they can evolve it later without forcing an architectural reset.

What Enterprises Should Look For in an Arbitrum Orbit Rollup Provider (Why Zeeve Stands Out)

Superior Performance

Enterprises need stable, high throughput and low latency. Zeeve delivers autoscaling node infrastructure, optimized Nitro configs, and Supernodes for query-heavy workloads, ensuring smooth operations even under heavy load.

Reliability and Security (SOC 2 Type II, ISO, GDPR)

Security and reliability are operating disciplines for Enterprises. Zeeve’s delivery method aligns with SOC 2 Type II controls, ISO 27001 practices, and GDPR expectations around data handling and residency. Deployments use isolated VPCs, private networking and peering, strict RBAC, and documented change control. Secrets management, audit logs, and disaster-recovery runbooks are standardized.

24/7 Sharp Monitoring and Enterprise SLA

Monitoring must understand rollups. Cloud probes alone won’t catch sequence stalls, sluggish batch posting, DAC signer unavailability, or indexing lag. Zeeve operates Orbit-aware telemetry that watches the sequencer queue, batch poster cadence, bridge inbox/outbox, RPC error budgets, and indexer health. Alerts go to human engineers who know the components and concerned stakeholders through emails/ slack, MS teams notifications. The service is backed by an enterprise SLA (99.9% uptime), with escalation paths defined before go-live. The result is fast detection, fast triage, and a short path to root cause when minutes matter.

100% Flexibility and White-Label Components

Large programs require architectural control and consistent branding. Zeeve supports custom Orbit configuration — fee token policy, access model, governance integration, L2/L3 topology — alongside a set of white-label components that are ready for production. These include a high-throughput indexer, a block explorer with contract verification and token views, validator/observer nodes for third-party transparency, a bridge UI and plugins, and faucets where they’re useful. If your compliance team needs KYC-aware endpoints, regional allowlists, or separated RPC surfaces for back-office flows, those policies are implemented as first-class parts of the system.

55+ Partner Integration Choices

Enterprises rarely launch chains in isolation. You will need oracles; interoperability; analytics; developer tooling; account abstraction; custody and HSM; wallets; potentially fiat ramps and identity providers. Zeeve brings a curated set of more than 55 production-tested integrations, with adapters and operational guidance already in place. This shortens delivery timelines, reduces glue code, and lowers the risk that a third-party component becomes a single point of failure.

Global Data Centres and Failover

Latency and compliance are location problems. Zeeve supports distributed deployments across nine cloud providers and more than 150 regions, with hybrid and on-prem options where policy or contract requires them. Multi-region failover is implemented with documented cutover steps. Data residency can be enforced through region pinning and network segmentation so local rules are met without fragmenting your operations team.

7+ Years of Battle-Tested Experience

Experience shows up as fewer surprises. Zeeve brings more than seven years of delivery, close to 400 rollup testnets, more than 50 production mainnets, over 6,000 deployed nodes, and 40+ enterprise clients. That scale translates into mature incident playbooks across all kinds of networks and stacks, credible performance tuning, faster RCA, and a clearer understanding of edge cases that don’t appear in just a few launches.

Migration from Old Systems without Data Loss

Most enterprises aren’t starting from zero. You may be moving from a legacy system, a L1, or a pilot environment. Migration is a program that needs rehearsal, state verification, and rollback. Zeeve runs dry-run migrations, checksum validation of state, staged cutovers, and post-migration reconciliation. The objective is precise: zero data loss and near-zero downtime. That discipline keeps customer-facing systems online while control moves to Orbit.

FAQs

1) Why should an enterprise pick Arbitrum Orbit instead of a generic L2?

Orbit gives you dedicated capacity, enterprise-friendly DA options (including AnyTrust DAC with L1 fallback), fine-grained access controls, and EVM-native tooling. In practice, that means predictable performance, tunable cost, and policies you can enforce — without forcing your developers to relearn their craft.

2) What makes Zeeve the best Orbit rollup provider for enterprises?

Security/compliance you can audit (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR alignment), 24/7 monitoring with a 99.9% SLA, custom Orbit configurations, white-labeled core components (Indexer, Block Explorer, Validator/Observer nodes), 55+ partner integrations, global regions across 9 cloud providers, and battle-tested experience (7+ years, ~400 testnets, 50+ mainnets, 6,000+ nodes, 40+ enterprise clients).

3. Can Orbit chains meet strict compliance and residency requirements?

Yes. With Zeeve, Orbit chains can be deployed regionally across 150+ zones, in hybrid or on-premise setups, ensuring compliance with GDPR and local regulations.

4. Can we customize components and maintain our own branding?

Yes. You can customize Orbit configs and use white-label components for the indexer, explorer, validator/observer nodes, bridge UI, and faucets. Policies like KYC gating, regional allowlists, or private RPCs are part of the deployment.

Best Avalanche L1 Provider for Faster Integration Add-ons

Zeeve — Wed, 10 Sep 2025 06:09:48 +0000

Avalanche L1s are trending. Google search data shows a surge in interest for AVAX, also, and the number of Avalanche L1 chains getting launched across industries is climbing week after week. It’s early days, but this is what the Avalanche Network looks like.

Toyota chose Avalanche to launch a dedicated L1 for vehicle finance and mobility solutions. South Korea has announced its own Avalanche L1 to issue and manage a national stablecoin. Denari Labs is tokenizing US securities. From car financing, gaming, and health to sovereign currencies, traditional finance industries are turning to Avalanche L1s to build sovereign blockchains tailored to their needs.

But what’s striking is that these use cases don’t just differ in TPS requirements, gas cost configuration, or permissioning models. Their needs go far deeper. A chain designed for a national stablecoin has compliance and regulatory hurdles that look nothing like those of an automotive finance network. An AI, DeFi, or Gaming-driven chain requires account abstraction, gasless transactions, and chain abstraction tools that an enterprise’s use case may never utilize. That’s why the story of Avalanche L1 adoption isn’t just about base-layer scalability — it’s also about integration flexibility.

The Need for Optional Integrations

A chain is designed to be lean by default. It provides consensus, throughput, and security — everything else is modular. That’s how it should be. But this modularity means that if you are launching an Avalanche L1, you either plan for the integrations you’ll need or scramble to add them later.

For example, take stablecoins: an industry that’s simultaneously the most demanded and the most constrained by regulation. You need KYC flows, custody rules, identity frameworks, and strict permissioning. If these aren’t available as optional modules, you’re left reinventing the wheel under regulatory pressure.

Or consider AI agent training. It’s one of the hottest trends, but it collides with two thorny areas — privacy and interoperability. AI agents can’t thrive if every transaction requires gas or if every interaction is siloed. You need programmable, gasless wallets, confidential transfer standards, and smooth cross-chain connectivity.

Tokenized securities are another example. Regional compliance is unavoidable — securities laws in Japan are different from those in Europe, and both are different from what the SEC expects. This is where optionality becomes existential. Permissioning, identity, transaction monitoring, and interoperability aren’t just add-ons; they are survival.

This is why the role of on-demand integration providers matters. You may not need a confidential transfer protocol on day one. You may not need a bridge aggregator until liquidity demands it. But you will need them at some point, and the cost of not having them available is lost time, lost users, and potentially lost compliance.

What Kind of Integrations Most Avalanche L1s Will Need?

When you map the actual integrations that Avalanche L1 projects need, they naturally fall into a few categories. Let’s look at them in practice.

1. Wallets and Account Abstraction are usually the first priority. A consumer chain needs to hide gas complexities from users; enterprise applications need programmable treasury controls.

Tools like 0xGasless bring account abstraction and gasless programmable wallets to your chain, while Etherspot adds APIs and SDKs for seamless account and chain abstraction. For treasury-grade safety, Palmera provides Safe (multisig) infrastructure, complete with a white-label UI and lifecycle support. Together, they give both users and institutions a smoother and safer way to interact with your chain.

2. Interoperability and Chain Abstraction are the second big bucket. Liquidity and users are fragmented, and no chain can afford isolation.
Integrations like Hyperlane open clean pathways to any onchain ecosystem. The Relayer listens for Avalanche Warp Messaging events and ferries them reliably across chains. VIA Labs specializes in stitching ecosystems into coherent user flows, while the Chain Abstraction Platform helps unify liquidity and routing through primitives like CCIF and Nitro. For DeFi-heavy chains, these integrations aren’t a must-have.

3. Identity and Compliance integrations are vital for sectors touching regulated assets.
For example, Privado ID enables privacy-first digital identity, where credentials are reusable across devices, services, and protocols. This allows you to enforce KYC/AML, restrict access to whitelisted wallets, or introduce tiered permissions — all without duct-taping identity solutions from scratch.

4. Data and Oracle Services are essential for any application that reacts to external signals.
Take RedStone, for example. It offers high-frequency, chain-secured data feeds suitable for fast-moving markets, while SEDA delivers programmable oracles with cross-chain reach. From derivatives to tokenized assets, these feeds are what make your chain more than an isolated ledger.

5. Developer Tooling accelerates time-to-market.
Thirdweb provides full-stack open-source tooling — frontend, backend, and onchain scaffolding — that allows teams to go from prototype to production quickly. Instead of rebuilding generic components, developers focus on what differentiates their product.

6. Observability and Indexing close the operational loop.
TraceHawk provides a customizable explorer for both EVM and non-EVM Avalanche environments, while Zeeve’s own indexing service, Traceye, delivers hosted subgraphs with enterprise-grade performance and security. They will become the backbone of analytics, reporting, and user transparency.

Finally, Privacy-Preserving Assets are crucial for enterprises and institutions.
The Encrypted ERC-20 standard (eERC) of Avalanche enables confidential token transfers on Avalanche. Whether it’s B2B settlements, payroll, or high-value consumer payments, privacy at the asset level is often the deal-breaker for adoption.

Put together, these categories paint a clear picture: every Avalanche L1 eventually requires a combination of wallets, interoperability, identity, data, tooling, observability, and privacy. The question isn’t whether you’ll need them — it’s whether you’ll have them ready when the business demands it.

What Cogitus by Zeeve Offers for your Avalanche L1s?

This is where Cogitus by Zeeve stands out. Instead of leaving you to chase vendors, wire APIs, and babysit upgrades, Cogitus provides an expanding catalog of integrations that can be enabled directly on your Avalanche L1. All the integrations mentioned above — 0xGasless, Etherspot, Hyperlane, Palmera, Privado ID, RedStone, SEDA, Thirdweb, TraceHawk, Zeeve Indexing, Encrypted ERC-20, ChainARQ, The Relayer, VIA Labs — are already part of the ecosystem.

Check out the non-exhaustive List of Integrations Here.

Cogitus is your managed layer. Integrations are configured for your chain, monitored for health, version-pinned to prevent breaking updates, and secured against vulnerabilities. If a new feature or compliance requirement emerges, you don’t juggle dashboards and patch pipelines — you request the integration, and Cogitus adds it for you. That flexibility is what keeps chains agile.

The benefits are clear. Without a partner like Cogitus, you’re left managing multiple vendors, dashboards, and update cycles. Each integration becomes its own mini-project, and every update becomes a risk. With Cogitus, integrations are treated like first-class features: you test them, you enable them, and you keep moving.

FAQs:

1) What makes Cogitus the best Avalanche L1 provider for integrations?

Cogitus treats integrations as a product surface. You get a curated catalog (account abstraction, identity/KYC, interoperability, oracles, indexing, explorers, privacy assets, multisig ops) delivered with single-pane control, version pinning, observability/health checks, and SLAs.

2) Why not DIY integrations or a barebones provider?

DIY looks cheaper until you price security reviews, breaking updates, multiple dashboards, and version drift across oracles, bridges, identity, explorers, and indexing. With a barebones provider you need to do this manually; Cogitus ships managed integrations with pinned versions, upgrade windows, and chain-specific configs. So, your team focuses on building products.

3) What Avalanche L1 integrations does Cogitus by Zeeve support?

0xGasless & Etherspot — account abstraction and gasless wallets
Hyperlane, The Relayer, VIA Labs, Chain Abstraction Platform — interoperability and cross-chain connectivity
Privado ID — privacy-first digital identity and compliance
Palmera — Safe (multisig) treasury infrastructure with white-label UI
RedStone & SEDA — oracles and real-world data feeds
thirdweb — full-stack developer tooling for Web3 apps
TraceHawk & Zeeve Indexing — block explorer and enterprise-grade indexing
Encrypted ERC-20 (eERC) — confidential token transfers
ChainARQ — DEX and bridge aggregation for liquidity

4) Can I request a custom integration on Cogitus if it’s not already supported?

Yes. One of Cogitus’s biggest advantages is on-demand integration support. If your project needs a tool that isn’t in the catalog, you can request it and Cogitus will integrate and maintain it for you. This ensures your L1 chain can adapt to regulatory changes, new user demands, or emerging technologies without delays.

Which of the 3 Orbit Chain Types Will Dominate Builder Launches in 2025?

Zeeve — Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:44:46 +0000

Arbitrum’s widely adopted solutions, like Arbitrum One, have successfully captured 50% L2 market share. Now, Arbitrum Orbit chains are equally spinning up the same narrative in both the L2 & L3 verse through its 3 types of Arbitrum Orbit chains:

Arbitrum Orbit Rollups
Arbitrum Orbit AnyTrust chains
Custom Orbit chains These solutions are solving some of the pressing challenges of different projects, and their choice can fundamentally define a chain’s security, cost, and performance profile.

In this blog, we’ll highlight the challenges that these stacks are purpose-built to solve, and which use-cases must pick them as their go-to stack. So, without any further ado, let’s get started.

arbritum orbit
Top-3 Arbitrum Orbit Solutions, their features, and real projects built using them

Arbitrum Orbit Rollups: Orbit Rollups are the most secure variant within the Arbitrum Orbit family. They follow the classic optimistic rollup model, where transactions are sequenced, compressed, and posted on Ethereum as calldata. Now, with the implementation of Ethereum’s EIP-4844, it is more cost-effectively posted as data “blobs”.

This on-chain data posting is the bedrock of Arbitrum Orbit Rollup’s security model. Because all transaction data is publicly available on the parent chain, any participant in the world can independently download it, reconstruct the L2’s state, and verify its correctness.

I) This enables a system of permissionless validation where any honest actor can detect fraud and challenge an incorrect state assertion. This challenge is resolved through Arbitrum’s battle-tested, multi-round, interactive fraud-proof system, which efficiently narrows down a dispute to a single computational step that is then verified on-chain.

II) By inheriting the full data availability and security guarantees of its settlement layer, an Orbit Rollup makes no additional trust assumptions beyond those of Ethereum itself.

III) The trade-off, however, is that Ethereum DA comes with higher posting costs and longer withdrawal times, especially for Orbit L3s that must pass through Arbitrum One before final settlement.

IV) While this model is the most expensive due to L1 data posting costs, this expense is best understood as a premium paid for unparalleled security. The Ethereum Dencun upgrade, which introduced EIP-4844, served as a crucial defensive measure for the Rollup model. By creating a separate, cheaper data market in the form of blobs, it significantly lowered this security premium, ensuring that Rollups remain an economically viable and competitive option for their target market.

Key Use-Cases that can be built as Arbitrum Orbit Rollups:
The Rollup model is the definitive choice for applications where security is paramount and cannot be compromised. These are typically protocols that secure immense value or operate in environments with stringent regulatory and compliance requirements, where any additional trust assumption can be costly.

For example,

High-Value DeFi:
Protocols such as decentralized exchanges (DEXs), lending markets, and perpetual platforms that manage billions of dollars in TVL/TVS require the unassailable security of Ethereum to protect user assets.

For these applications, the term “Rollup” has become a brand synonymous with “Ethereum-grade security,” and definitely signals trust to users and liquidity providers.

High Value Real-World Assets (RWAs):
Platforms tokenizing assets like real estate, private credit, or government treasuries must present a clear and defensible compliance posture to attract institutional capital and people’s trust.

The transparency and verifiability of posting all transaction data on-chain are fundamental requirements for this sector.

Bridges and Core Infrastructure:
Most of the TVS is held in bridges. Such kind of foundational protocols that are responsible for securing assets from numerous other chains cannot afford to introduce new vectors of trust.

Some Projects Successfully Deployed As Orbit Rollups Chains
AnimeChain
Animechain is specially designed for the Anime community, where they can enable on-chain licensing, monetization, and creation of anime characters. For this purpose, they sought very high TPS and faster finality, while also inheriting security for users in a trust-minimized manner.

Orbit rollups with ETH as the settlement layer delivered to meet this demand for Anime. Through Orbit rollups, Anime was able to clock 40,000 TPS with a 250 ms blocktime. Moreover, they were also able to do gasless onboarding, transparent right management, and so on and so forth.

Reya Chain
Another project using Orbit rollup is ReyaChain, which aims at unifying the CeFi, DeFi, and Tradfi ecosystems into a single hub. Besides leveraging the common Orbit’s features like speed, scalability, and throughput, the extended customization has allowed Reya to adopt an architecture with financial logic integrated directly into the network. This enables liquidity flow to be accessible by various applications all at once.

Also, Reyachain could fulfill its requirement for a different DA, which is a hybrid DA setup. Within this, the orders and executions get posted on Celestia (external DA), and account data is pushed to the Ethereum Layer 1. For settlement, Reyachain uses Ethereum.

With this support, ReyaChain is hitting 200k+ trades a week, multiple collateral & instruments for 60 markets through 100ms blocktimes, MEV-free trades, deep liquidity, high availability, and more.

Arbitrum AnyTrust Chains The Arbitrum AnyTrust protocol offers an equal alternative to the traditional public rollups. These AnyTrust chains are designed to drastically reduce costs while maintaining strong security guarantees.

For AnyTrust chains, instead of posting full transaction data to Ethereum, the sequencer sends the data to a permissioned Data Availability Committee (DAC).

The members of this committee run specialized Data Availability Server (DAS) software to store the transaction data off-chain, and collectively sign a Data Availability Certificate (DACert).

I) The security model of AnyTrust is built on a ‘minimal trust assumption’.

II) The system remains secure as long as a small minority of DAC members (for example, 2 out of a committee of 20) are honest and will provide the data when requested.

III) In specific use cases, this is a significantly more robust and easier-to-satisfy assumption than the supermajority (e.g., 14 out of 20) required by conventional public rollups.

IV) However, the most interesting feature of AnyTrust is its “fallback to rollup” mechanism.

If the DAC fails to cooperate and does not produce a DACert for a batch of transactions, the protocol forces the sequencer to post the full transaction data on-chain, exactly like a standard Rollup.

V) This one security step ensures that the chain’s liveness is always preserved and that its security is ultimately tethered to Ethereum. This makes AnyTrust a “conditionally secure rollup” if we want to say so.

VI) Plus, this minimal on-chain footprint of AnyTrust enables powerful features that are difficult for Orbit Rollups to support, like the ability to use a custom ERC-20 token for gas fees and fast withdrawals that can bypass the standard 7-day challenge period.

Key Use-Cases That Can Be Considered for Building on Orbit AnyTrust Chains
AnyTrust is perfect for solutions for applications where high throughput and ultra-low transaction costs are critical for delivering a viable and engaging user experience.

The sectors below represent the largest untapped markets for Arbitrum AnyTrust and are poised to drive the next wave of adoption.

Web3 Gaming:
On-chain games often require thousands of low-value, high-frequency actions, such as minting in-game items, updating character states, or executing small moves.

The sub-cent transaction fees offered by AnyTrust make complex and immersive on-chain game logic economically feasible for gaming chains.

Consumer Facing Applications:
Social Apps: Social apps are looking for low-fee messaging and micro content sharing in a scalable and verifiable manner. AnyTrust chains are built to deliver transactions at scale because they can use their own DAC committee for data posting and achieving near infinite scale.
Payments & Microtransactions: For consumer payment apps, AnyTrust architecture can be a perfect fit. The ultra-low fees enable use cases like in-app purchases, tipping, and other such small-value transfers in-expensive.
DePIN & High-Frequency DeFi:
Sectors like Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN), which rely on frequent micro-transactions from a large number of devices, or decentralized derivatives exchanges with high-frequency order book updates, find a perfect technical and economic fit in AnyTrust’s performance profile.

AI Agents & Web3 x AI Applications:

The rise of AI Agent uses on-chain creates an immense demand for high-frequency, low-cost transactions. These agents signal, transact, and respond hundreds of times per session. AnyTrust provides the cheap and predictable data availability needed for such AI agent markets. This makes it an ideal infrastructure for the emerging DeFAI sector, also.

Some Project That Successfully Deployed As AnyTrust Rollups
XAI Games
XAI Games wanted to solve the problem of gameplay in the Web3 space. For example, most of the games are lacking experience; rather, they delve more into economies. But with that model in mind, it is hard to onboard the AAA games, the OGs of the Web 2 gaming world. XAI games solve this by providing a ready-to-deploy environment for game builders.

They use AnyTrust chains for that because it provides lightning-fast transaction speed, as platforms like STEAM, the Web 2 gaming launchpads have 100 M users. To compete with them and onboard all of them to Web 3 as a launchpad, XAI needs lightning-fast transactions, a fully gasless experience, seamless onboarding, and quick settlements. Orbit AnyTrust chains were purpose-built for that.

SkyNet

The core challenge of an AI economy is handling millions of microtransactions at extreme scale with predictable, low costs. Skynet is building an AI-optimized L3 Arbitrum Orbit chain with a goal to be the transactional backbone for a future where AI-agents can outnumber humans.

They choose AnyTrust model for this ‘cheap & predictable’ data availability, which is essential for such high-frequency AI agent markets.

Launched with the expertise of Zeeve Rollups-as-a-Service, Skynet chain is highly customized with features like a SKYUSD gas token for its AI-driven ops.

Learn More Here: Skynet’s New Blockchain on Arbitrum Orbit will Scale AI Agents at Warp Speed

PropFTX
PropFTX combines AI with Orbit functionalities to offer fractional ownership for real estate industry and allows users to buy, sell, and invest in tokenized shares of high-value commercial properties.

For a consumer-facing investment platform that requires frequent, low-cost interactions and a seamless UX, AnyTrust DAC model is an ideal choice. It provides the necessary scalability and affordability to make fractional investing accessible, and RaaS support from Zeeve ensures a robust and reliable infrastructure.

Custom Arbitrum Orbit Chains Custom DA chains are in support of the modular thesis and allow Arbitrum Orbit chains to integrate with external, specialized data availability networks. Here, the Orbit chain’s sequencer posts transaction data directly to a third-party DA layer.

In return, it receives a cryptographic proof of publication, which is then posted to the settlement layer (like Arbitrum One) to be included in the state root.

Though this model introduces a new set of trust assumptions, as the security and liveness of the Orbit chain become coupled with the cryptoeconomic security of the external DA network’s validator set as well.

Here are some DA layers that can be integrated with the Arbitrum Orbit chains:

Celestia: The first modular DA network to integrate with Orbit, Celestia uses Data Availability Sampling (DAS) and Namespaced Merkle Trees (NMTs) to allow light clients to verify data availability without downloading entire blocks. Its integration with Orbit relies on Blobstream to relay data commitments back to the parent chain.
EigenDA: Eigen layers DA solution leverages Ethereum’s economic security through EigenLayer’s restaking primitive. Orbit chains using EigenDA can achieve massive throughput secured by a decentralized network of operators restaking billions of dollars worth of ETH.
Avail DA: Originating from within Polygon, Avail focuses on validity proofs (specifically, KZG commitments) for data availability, which can offer faster finality guarantees without the need for extended challenge periods.
The choice between these providers is a strategic alignment with a specific security philosophy. It can be the independent proof-of-stake security of Celestia or the Ethereum-aligned restaking security of EigenDA, or maybe the extremely cheap cost of NEAR DA.

Read More About Data Availability Solutions Used in Layer2/ Layer3 Chains:

Alt DA Solutions Changing the Cost Game for L2 Rollups: Spotlight on Key Players
Data Availability Layer in Rollups: What is it and why do we need one?
Key Use-Cases That Can Be Considered for Building on Orbit Custom Chains
Applications here have the requirements that exceed even the high performance of AnyTrust; those who seek a greater degree of sovereignty and deeper integration with a broader modular ecosystem can look into this category.

So in one line, we could say, this category is ideal for those who are willing to accept a more complex and novel security model in exchange for ultimate flexibility and the lowest possible costs.

Fully on-chain Gaming:
For games that aim to put every action and asset on-chain, the extreme cost reduction offered by Celestia or other AltDA platforms in combination with the Nitro stack is a necessity. Because they might need a massive volume of transactions to be virtually free, this goal can only be achieved by moving data availability to a hyper-optimized additional chain.

High Value DeFi & RWAs
DeFi and RWAs are looking for high-value trade, but for that matter, they don’t want to be restricted by the limitations of storing data only on Ethereum or to a limited set of DAC nodes; rather, they want other custom economic data storage solutions, KYC, and other compliance.

Interoperability Hubs
Interops hubs unify security at a single checkpoint; as a result, they cannot operate in a trust-minimized manner. Custom rollups give them an edge to choose a DA layer that can be trusted, and at the same time, it is cost-effective as well.

Some Projects That Successfully Deployed As Custom Rollups
These categories of applications often have requirements that exceed even the high performance of AnyTrust, or they seek a greater degree of sovereignty and deeper integration with the broader modular ecosystem.

Though the custom Orbit rollup is new, it’s been adopted by some of the innovative and new-age projects, such as;

Kinto
Kinto, the modular exchange, has migrated to Arbitrum Orbit to seek a better level of security, data integrity, and regulatory compliance matching traditional finance. It uses Arbitrum Nitro Stack to operate as a rollup operating in parallel with Arbitrum One and Nova while being fully compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), and settles transactions on Ethereum Mainnet.

Kinto uses Celestia as its external DA layer. The network collects all sequencer fees (gas) from network transactions, and its revenue comes from the spread between these fees and the cost of settling the batched transactions on Ethereum Mainnet. Regarding the token, Kinto uses $KINTO as its governance and utility token. With all these features, Kinto has been able to build a fully KYC-compliant L2 that can support both the modern finance and decentralized DeFi protocols.

Alpha Dune Network
Alpha Dune Network is a Layer3 solution built with an Orbit stack for ultra-fast and low-cost transactions that is integral in DeFi. Built as a custom chain, Alpha Dune has integrated Celestias as the DA layer while still using Ethereum-level security.

Other features that Orbit offers to the network are modular, on-chain scaling, and decentralized governance. Regarding the token, Alpha uses the DUNE token as its native gas token to power every transaction and interaction, including asset transfers.

Plume Network
Plume is an RWA / real-world (RWA) focused project to ensure 100% compliance in RWA activities like earning yield, trading, speculation, lending/borrowing, etc. Built as a modular & permissionless L2, Plume uses Orbit as its custom rollup stack and Celestia as an off-chain DA layer.

Plume is home to 80+ RWA (Real World Assets) and DeFi projects. Orbit’s customization features allow Plume to manage its projects and high-traction network seamlessly. Speaking about token, Plume Network utilizes PLUME for transaction fees, staking, governance, and various incentives within the ecosystem.

The ecosystem also features Plume USD (pUSD), which is a stablecoin wrapper for USDC, and Plume ETH (pETH), a liquid staking token that is pegged to Ethereum.

Which of These 3 Types of Arbitrum Orbit Chain Could See More Adoption?
First, the largest addressable markets for new blockchain applications are in consumer-facing sectors like gaming, payment, and social media, which are fundamentally incompatible with the fee structures of the Rollup model.

Second, while Custom DA chains also meet this demand, AnyTrust is a more pragmatic and lower-risk path for the majority of developers. It offers the ultra-low costs needed for consumer applications while retaining a native, battle-tested security backstop in the form of the Arbitrum protocol’s fallback mechanism.

For a new project launching in 2025, choosing this tightly integrated, in-house solution is a more conservative and predictable path to scalability than adopting an external dependency on a separate, still-maturing DA network.

Though we feel all three chains will see adoption, with the highest possibility being for AnyTrust & Custom Orbit chains.

Build Any of These 3 Types Arbitrum Orbit Solution with Zeeve RaaS

The whole explanation in this article highlights the rising demand for the Arbitrum-powered solutions. If these features align with your project requirements, Zeeve RaaS is your ideal partner to build your own sovereign, performant, and customizable chain as per your needs: Be it Orbit rollup, AnyTrust Chain, or Custom Orbit chains.

With support for AnyTrust mode, Stylus (Rust/C++), and 55+ third-party integrations, Zeeve gives you the tools to design, deploy, and evolve your Orbit chain your way. And when you’re ready to go beyond the testnet, Zeeve offers you smooth mainnet migrations with your default settings and required integrations in the fastest possible time.

Talk to our experts to discuss your requirements. We’re here 24/7 to help you go from idea to execution — faster, cheaper, and fully in control.

Is Avalanche L1 About to Become the Hotspot for Vehicle Finance & Mobility?

Zeeve — Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:22:48 +0000

Avalanche L1s are making headlines due to the value they have captured in the last few months by providing a custom stack. Due to this, gaming, stablecoins, DeFi, NFTs, manufacturing, and even government sectors are getting revolutionized by it.

Now, 2025 is set to add another major sector to that list: mobility and vehicle finance. Toyota has already brought global attention to Avalanche by prototyping its Mobility Orchestration Network (MON) on the stack, showing how vehicles can be transformed into verifiable, finance-ready assets. At the same time, companies like CodeNekt, a Zeeve client, are using Avalanche L1s to tackle generational problems in vehicle data management, from fraud and traceability to compliance and fleet optimization.

What this signal is, Avalanche has the architectural mobility needs. In this blog, we’ll break down why legacy systems fail to support next-gen mobility and how Avalanche’s multi-L1 design is solving those structural gaps.

Limitations of Legacy Systems in Solving Next-Gen Mobility Barriers of Automotive Sector

The automotive industry is riddled with data silos and fragmented compliance rules. A single vehicle may pass through six or more hands (OEMs, fleet operators, insurers, regulators, drivers, service centers, and more maybe). Yet the digital record that underpins its value remains fragmented, unverifiable, and non-portable

And unless mobility assets can become verifiable, finance-ready Real-World assets, the sector cannot scale into electrification, autonomy, or sustainable fleet operations. There are three major gaps that prevent mobility from becoming a trusted and liquid asset class:

First, the Organizational Gap. Vehicle registration, insurance, taxation, VIN and OEM data, and maintenance logs are all stored in isolated government or corporate databases. There is no Mobility Oriented Account (MOA) that bundles these institutional, technical, and economic claims into a tamper-evident identity. This leaves second-hand markets rife with odometer fraud, hidden liabilities, and scams, while manufacturers face massive recall costs because data trails vanish after the first ownership cycle.

Second, the Industrial Gap. Mobility is not one industry; it’s a mesh of capital networks (banks, securitization platforms), utility networks (ride-hailing, V2G, charging), and trust networks (registration, compliance). Yet there is no neutral digital layer to let them transact atomically. Fleet operators cannot refinance assets based on live operational data. Insurers misprice policies because they lack standardized, machine-verifiable safety and usage proofs. The absence of a multi-chain orchestration layer keeps mobility’s value locked.

Third, the National Gap. Vehicles are inherently cross-border, but compliance is regional. Registration certificates valid in one country lose legitimacy in another. Taxation and insurance proofs are regional. Used-car exports into developing markets often bypass safety and environmental checks, flooding roads with high emissions. Without a protocol for local-first, global-next compliance, mobility remains trapped in jurisdictional silos.

These issues create friction everywhere—from customers doubting vehicle history, to fleet operators struggling with refinancing, to OEMs navigating a maze of regulations when selling in new regions.

The answer isn’t just digitization. It’s a new trust layer that bundles institutional, technical, and economic proofs into a single, verifiable identity for every vehicle. And that’s where Avalanche L1s could shine.

How Avalanche L1s Ends Up as The Perfect Solution For The Automobile Industry?

Avalanche L1s are making a difference because they provide the purpose-built stack to address the challenges mentioned above by providing:

Data Access and Control Layer For Privacy

With the public blockchains, you cannot integrate permissioned access. Which means anyone can see the transaction happening on the blockchain. This could be detrimental to using blockchains because your competitor can see the business secrets. But this is a double-edged sword, because if you do not launch on a public blockchain, instead, launch a consortium chain, even then, your problem will still remain because not every player will be using the same stack as you. In that case, you still face the problem of data silos.

That’s where Avalanche L1s are providing data access and control layers that car manufacturers can use to interact with their peers and share only whatever is necessary for the smooth operation of the business, irrespective of the stack they use.

To do that, Avalanche L1s allow setting up administrator nodes with full control over the stack, thereby ensuring role-based access for regulators and competitors who are willing to collaborate but don’t have the means to do that without jeopardizing operations due to privacy constraints. And its bridges can also help interact with different chains irrespective of the stack they use.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1943355362872017185-877'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1943355362872017185&theme=dark" }

Native Interop through Multi-L1 Architecture
Interoperability is a challenge when there are various players in the industry using different stacks for operation. Avalanche L1s are using multichain support through Interop using Avalanche Warp Messaging and Teleporter to allow communication, especially in the Delivery-versus-Payment (DvP) transactions. Because you need instant interoperability irrespective of the stack that two different applications are using when interacting with each other, this is highly suited for use cases such as BEVs, monetizing energy storage, logistics efficiency, and green transition.

Toyota’s MON 4-L1 prototype architecture below illustrates how Avalanche L1s can be configured for mobility with dedicated L1s for trust, finance, utility, and stablecoin payments, all connected through Avalanche Interchain Messaging (ICM). This modular design makes Delivery-vs-Payment and cross-network coordination possible in a way legacy infrastructure never could.

Cross-Border Compatibility Via Custom VMs:
Compliance is another major battle that the automotive sector is wishful of winning, but they do not get the means to help achieve that when they are operating in different jurisdictions. With the help of Avalanche L1 chains, automobile companies can create built-in KYC/AML checks, specifically targeting financiers and insurers.

At the same time, it is also possible to create an administrator dashboard using the Avalanche L1 stack and give role-based access to regulators to access important information and when needed. At the same time, preserving privacy in the process through eERC-20 features that Avalanche L1s are using.

Building The Fungibility Ladder

Making vehicles fungible is a major bottleneck for fleet owners because they cannot set up standards where they can self-identify the vehicles and make them readily available for financing in cross border operations. Avalanche L1s provide a fungibility ladder for these fleet owners dispersed across different jurisdictions through a standardized access to overcome this. Using Avalanche L1s, the automobile players can spin up their own chains and set up specific traits for their NFTs that can be easily exchanged overseas/cross border in a near instant, scalable cost-effective and compliant manner, eliminating the friction to manage cross border fleet management that automobile players are going through at the moment.

Optimizing Cost For Faster Deployment

This is the most important aspect to consider when launching a blockchain-based automotive business, as you do not want to overburden yourself with unnecessary technology. Avalanche L1s are purpose-built because there’s no compulsion to stake like 2000 AVAX to run your validators for your chain.

With that being said, you are getting a stable infrastructure cost to launch your automotive application on top of Avalanche L1s, and despite their rigorous increase in usage, the cost wouldn’t be inflating in the near future because the L1s have Pay-As-you-Go, custom gas tokens, and other specs to keep the operations optimized from a cost standpoint.

At the same time, the consensus mechanism of Avalanche L1s is purpose-built as well to accommodate a scaling automotive sector with transactions matching almost 4500 TPS due to the random sub-sampling consensus mechanism. Martin Eckardt, Senior Director of DevRel at Ava Labs, specifically emphasizes the role Avalanche L1s are playing in keeping the cost low for efficient operations despite the automotive business scaling in a podcast between Zeeve’s CEO, Dr Ravi Chamria, and Francis Hanchem, founder of CodeNekt:

Future Proofing Mobility

Avalanche L1s have an advantage when it comes to future-proofing the mobility sector because they have the capability to bridge finance, mobility, and IoTs under a common stack, which no other stack has delivered so far. Due to this trait only, the Togg ecosystem in Turkey has partnered with Avalanche to take mobility to the next level.

If you are someone in the automotive industry facing the problems mentioned in this blog, Avalanche L1s can rightfully address them.

But if you are bothered that all of these would amount to spending hours to integrate the same, Zeeve can help you in this regard to launch your Avalanche L1 for the Automotive Industry.

Launch Your Avalanche L1 for Automotive Industry with Cogitus by Zeeve

Zeeve has a proven track record of launching more than 15 + Avalanche L1s in the last 90 days on its own platform. So, if you want to build your own purpose-built Layer 1 chain for your automotive business, Zeeve can help, from rapid node & network setup to RPC configurations to validator node settings, integrations, and more.

We also acknowledge the fact that you would like to continuously monitor your Avalanche L1 node, the Avalanche L1 dashboard that we provide will help you continuously monitor all the activities. In addition to this, you also get the benefits of 55+ integration partners that we bring on Zeeve.

So, if you have any specific requirements that you want to integrate with your Avalanche L1 node, you can readily use them. So, if you are planning to set-up your next Avalanche L1 node, we are here to help you.

Write to us your requirements or set up a one-on-one call with our experts, where we can show you an Avalanche L1 demo.

Babylon Staking Explained: Earn $BABY Staking Rewards with Zeeve Validator

Zeeve — Wed, 03 Sep 2025 13:17:34 +0000

Babylon brings Bitcoin’s battle-tested security to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) chains without the need for wrapping or bridges, utilizing trustless cryptography. You can stake $BABY, the native token of the Babylon Genesis chain, to earn rewards and help secure the network.

Zeeve now supports $BABY delegation on enterprise-grade infrastructure, with 99.95% uptime, backed by SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications.

This article focuses on $BABY delegation—what Babylon is, how it actually works under the hood, the numbers that matter right now, why staking BABY makes sense, and why delegating to Zeeve is the most pragmatic way to do it if you care about uptime, fees, and operational discipline.

What is Babylon?

Babylon is a Bitcoin-secured security layer that extends Bitcoin’s credibility to PoS chains and decentralized applications.

The protocol achieves this by separating the provider of security from the location of the throughput. Security comes natively from Bitcoin; throughput and coordination happen on the Babylon Genesis chain (a Cosmos SDK chain using CometBFT).

That split keeps Bitcoin where it excels, enabling economic finality and credible neutrality while allowing PoS systems to scale and interoperate.

This chain introduces a dual-staking design:

BTC staking: Bitcoin UTXOs achieve finality for client chains; slashing enforcement occurs on Bitcoin.
BABY staking: $BABY secures the Genesis chain, the control plane that routes Bitcoin-backed security and manages fees/governance. Earns rewards in return.
This transforms Bitcoin into a reusable finality anchor, making Babylon a security/liquidity coordination layer for Bitcoin-secured networks.

How Babylon Works? The Roles and the Flow

BABY-staked CometBFT Validator produces/validates blocks on the Genesis chain, runs governance upgrades/params, and keeps the control plane live. Delegators stake BABY to these validators and earn a share of the protocol’s rewards, minus the commission.

Finality Providers sign finality for blocks using BTC-secured credentials. Misbehavior can trigger on-Bitcoin slashing via EOTS (Extractable One-Time Signatures). No custodians. No wrapped BTC.

A block is final when a dual-quorum is achieved. This means that both validators and finality providers attest.

$BABY Value Accrual: Why the Token Matters?

Fees: BABY is the gas token for transactions and smart contracts on Genesis.

Security coordination premium: As more client chains subscribe to Bitcoin-anchored finality and liquidity routed through Genesis, the control plane accrues activity, captured in fees and validator economics.

Governance: BABY holders (directly or via delegation) set parameters that determine the price and scale of the security marketplace.

Staking rewards: BABY emissions/rewards compensate for validator work and delegator capital that keeps the plane reliable.

Statistical Overview of $BABY Token

Why Delegate $BABY to Zeeve-run Babylon Validator?

Zeeve is an active Babylon validator with a track record of running institutional validators across multi-cloud, multi-region deployments.

Here are some more reasons to choose us:

Lowest commission among active validators: 3%

More rewards stay with you, compounding your long-term yield.

Proven uptime: 99.95%

High availability = more consistent rewards and fewer missed blocks.

Non-custodial by design

Delegate from your own wallet or regulated custody. Your keys, your control.

Enterprise-grade ops

Multi-cloud, multi-region, Sentry & backup nodes, auto-failover, 24/7 SRE monitoring, and enterprise SLA.

Security & compliance you can audit

SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 controls, strict IAM, continuous monitoring, audit-grade logs.

Full transparency

Track validator health, commission history, missed blocks, and reward accruals—export-ready for finance/compliance.

Frictionless flows

delegate/claim/compound/unbond flows with clear timelines, plus API access for institutions.

FAQs

1. What does it mean to “stake BABY”?
You delegate BABY to a validator (e.g., Zeeve). Your stake increases validator security weight; you earn a share of protocol rewards, minus the validator commission.

2. Is staking with Zeeve non-custodial?
Yes. You can delegate from your own wallet or a regulated custody account. Zeeve never takes possession of your keys.

3. Is there a minimum to delegate?
Not with Zeeve. Running your own active validator requires 75,978 BABY (~$3,724), but delegators face no minimum.

4. How are rewards determined?
Rewards depend on network parameters (inflation, distribution rules) and validator performance. The current APR is ~20.56% (with a recent 1-month delta of ~0.54 percentage points). Zeeve’s 3% commission is among the most delegate-friendly.

5. How long does unbonding take?
Around 2 days (≈300 BABY blocks). Unbonding is an on-chain process; once complete, your tokens are once again liquid.

6. What makes Babylon’s “Bitcoin security” credible?
EOTS ties slashing to Bitcoin UTXOs; penalties are enforced on Bitcoin, not via wrapped assets or custodians. The Genesis chain then uses a dual quorum (CometBFT validators + Bitcoin-staked finality providers) for block finality.

7. What about risk and slashing?
All PoS networks carry operational risk. Zeeve minimizes it with redundancy, continuous monitoring, strict IAM, incident runbooks, and SLA-backed processes.

8. What if I want to run my own validator?
Zeeve offers white-labeled Babylon validators for those who wish to run their own validator nodes, featuring the same enterprise-grade features and 99.95% uptime guarantees. Join the Discord to connect with the community, get support, and stay updated on the latest validator developments.

Ulalo Mainnet Is Live – Patient-Controlled Healthcare Just Went Global on Avalanche L1

Zeeve — Mon, 01 Sep 2025 08:50:31 +0000

Testnets prove potential. Mainnets prove you’re ready. And Ulalo is ready.

We’ve heard it all before—“healthcare needs transformation.” But after years of promises, patients are still locked out of their own data. Cross-border care remains a bureaucratic maze. And infrastructure that actually puts patients first is still rare.

Ulalo started with a vision to change that with a sovereign Blockchain. Live now on its own sovereign Avalanche Layer 1, Ulalo is powering a production-grade health wallet where patients own, control, and share their data — across languages, across borders, across devices. And it’s already doing what most healthtech platforms only promise—giving people true ownership of their medical records. Without delays, silos, and compromises.

Ulalo is a global health passport for the on-chain age—powered by AI, built for privacy, and now running on a sovereign Layer 1 chain built and managed by Zeeve Cogitus.

“ULALO’s vision is simple: to bridge people and the world. Our chain lets patients globally access top-tier healthcare and regain control of their data. Partnering with Zeeve and launching on Avalanche made this possible, providing the scale and integrity necessary to make a real-world difference in healthcare.”

— Fabrice Kwetchet, Founder & CEO, Ulalo

Avalanche L1 Gave Ulalo What Healthcare Demands

In Ulalo’s world, a patient scans a diagnostic report, the system runs AI classification, stores the result on IPFS, verifies it on-chain, and lets a doctor in another country review the data—all in seconds. That kind of real-time, cross-border flow can’t depend on a congested public chain or someone else’s mainnet rules.

Ulalo chose Avalanche L1 stack for its sovereign Blockchain because it offered deterministic finality, low and predictable fees, and the ability to control everything—from token logic to governance rules. As a sovereign chain, Ulalo could hardwire its healthcare logic directly into the infrastructure without compromise. No external dependencies, no cohabiting apps, no resource contention. Just a clean, scalable, healthcare-grade chain that doesn’t blink—even under pressure.

It also meant the Ulalo team could natively embed things like biometric authentication, real-time syncing across mobile devices, and multilingual interfaces—without having to ask permission from anyone.

That’s how you build infrastructure for 400 million underserved patients.

What’s Live on Ulalo Mainnet Right Now

Everything Ulalo promised on testnet is now live, running, and already in use.

Users open the wallet, scan a report, and AI classifies the data. It’s encrypted, stored off-chain, and the proof is logged immutably to Ulalo’s L1. The hash is verifiable. The access is controlled. And the data is shareable instantly — no silos, no follow-ups, no risk of leakage.

Doctors get reliable histories. Patients stay in control. Insurers get integrity. And it’s already powering:

Multilingual, patient-facing health wallets
Live biometric-auth syncing across devices
AI-based health alerts with structured record analysis
Smart record-sharing with expiry and permission controls
$ULA-based insurance and ecosystem interactions

The foundation is now real. The user journey is real. And the infrastructure is ready for scale.

Zeeve and Cogitus Made Mainnet Feel Like Mission Control

Ulalo didn’t just need help launching a chain. It needed production-grade reliability with zero learning curve and zero fragility.

With Zeeve Cogitus, Ulalo got a chain that behaves like a backend platform — not a lab setup.

Zeeve took full charge of the infrastructure — from provisioning to production — with:

Custom Avalanche L1 deployment, tuned for AI, healthcare ops, and global sync
Dedicated RPC infrastructure to handle wallet and app usage at scale
TraceHawk Explorer integration for network transparency, data verification, and audit trails
24/7 monitoring and observability, with health dashboards and real-time alerts
Critical path support, ensuring every component stays up — even in high-dependency environments

“Ulalo’s chain had to meet a higher bar. It’s not about performance metrics. It’s about being unbreakable when lives are on the line. With Cogitus, we didn’t just power a mainnet — we operationalized trust.”

— Dr. Ravi Chamria, Co-founder & CEO, Zeeve

Ulalo is now mainnet live. $ULA is preparing for its next exchange listing. Strategic partners are coming on board. But more importantly, the chain works. Right now. In production. And it shows what’s possible when builders go full-stack with the right infra partner.

So if you’re building for healthcare, digital ID, public health systems, or global data sovereignty—Ulalo’s path is now open. And Zeeve’s Cogitus stack is ready to get you there.

Let’s build the next real use case. For patients. For people. For production.

Why Are Avalanche L1s the Fast-Track Play for Stablecoins in 2025?

Zeeve — Tue, 26 Aug 2025 07:48:58 +0000

Stablecoins have probably become the 2nd killer application in the crypto ecosystem after Bitcoin. And the transaction volumes are already exceeding all traditional payment channel benchmarks.

They kind of capture the full money movement revenue stack. JPYC’s Yen Yen-backed stablecoins, Wyoming USD-backed FRNT, and LG CNS Won-based stablecoins are making headlines at the moment due to their anticipated launches. In all this news, there’s a common name, Avalanche, ending up as the perfect battle-tested stack due to its credible 10+ stablecoin launches. A few days ago, South Korea announced its own stablecoin on an Avalanche L1.

In this article, we shall see why stablecoins are suddenly going in trend and how Avalanche L1s for stablecoins have provided the perfect base to build them. But before we do that, let’s give you a brief overview of Avalanche L1s

What are Avalanche L1s?

Avalanche L1s are sovereign blockchains with their own rules defining their operations, independent of the consensus layer. Due to this feature, they are ending up as the perfect choice to build not just stablecoins but different purpose-built L1s on top of them.

But why are stablecoins trending intensively at the moment to create a race condition among governments, institutions, and corporations to use it? Is it because of the adoption, utility, or something else? Let’s find that out.

Stablecoins: A Then Vs Now Journey Defining A Transition In Action

When you think about stablecoins, the first and foremost thing that would come to your mind is that it was an important tool for crypto traders to hedge against market volatility during their inception period. But with the changing times, their identity changed.

Now stablecoins are not just a means to hedge against market risk for traders, rather, they are an integral financial vehicle to revolutionize modern finance because institutions and governments are integrating stablecoins to overcome some of their innate challenges like settlements, payroll, cross-border remittance, and so on and so forth.

But in this pursuit, they are indeed facing some systematic failures nonetheless when those stablecoins are launched on public blockchains. For example, Franklin Templeton started using stablecoins like USDC developed on public blockchains to expedite settlements, but while doing that, they faced a few pressing challenges, like;

Compulsion to keep a huge amount of USDC buffer for providing near instantly liquidity as and when required to the users.
High dependency on ZeroHash for providing on/off ramp services, which further complicated compliance and settlement rails.
Blockchain network performance issues arise because launching stablecoins on top of public blockchains amounts to consensus delays, downtime, and privacy issues, which have an adverse impact on share redemption. And in most cases, they had to switch to manual systems to accommodate the same.
High Operational cost for Franklin Templeton because they had to pay for the gas of the users, as using USDC didn’t allow payment in native tokens.
And last but not least, regularity uncertainty, tech vulnerabilities, and other risks further plagued the operations.

Citing these reasons, Circle has been thinking of a purpose-built L1 for USDC to provide such institutions the leverage to issue their own gas tokens, control transaction costs, and keep network performance isolated from unrelated activity. But why is Circle inclined to provide a custom layer for stablecoins? Are they going to turn mainstream in 2025?

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1955684525796655120-343'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1955684525796655120&theme=dark" }

Emerging Use-Cases To Make Them Mainstream for Adoption

1. Trade Facilitation

In 2025, economies like the EU, UAE, and Hong Kong have created clear guidelines for derivative trading; thereby, attracting the interest of the institutions and retail platforms to build and expand their services.

For that matter, Stablecoins are acting as a perfect solution to move in and out of volatile assets. Stablecoins are still used for short-term holding between trades. But for institutions to use them, they should be coming up with advanced features to provide privacy controls, scale, and security.

2. National Currency Internationalization

Most of the economies are in a race to launch their own fiat-backed stablecoins. For example, China is exploring Yuan-backed stablecoins; similarly, the EU is accelerating the plan to make Euro-backed stablecoins in 2025 to compete with USD-backed stablecoins. But while doing all of these, they need to stay compliant and trade at scale.

Corporate and Institutional Adoption for Faster Settlements Now, stablecoins are growing beyond speculation, with SpaceX sending back funds from Starlink sales in Argentina and Nigeria, and ScaleAI pays overseas contractors with them.

Institutions are increasingly exploring new use cases for stablecoin infrastructure, and it’s driving increased on-chain credit activity.

Institutions are also progressing to use stablecoins due to the regulatory immunity that they are going through upon showing their verifiable backing.

Some of the key names like Bank of America, Standard Chartered, PayPal, Revolut and Stripe are already exploring options to use them. But they want a great infrastructure, liquidity to make that happen.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1937609255189696521-781'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1937609255189696521&theme=dark" }

4.The Yield Paradigm
On top of trading and payments , stablecoins are used in DeFi to earn yield:

So if stablecoin supply grows, established DeFi protocols will likely benefit from it:

– Aave/Morpho/Euler/Fluid

– Uniswap/Curve

– Maker

– Ethena

Yield is a key factor that influences stablecoin dynamics. Yet, probably the juiciest trades will come from new infra/consumer-facing/yield apps that are yet to launch. New, exciting tokens usually attract more attention.

How Avalanche L1s Could Make a Huge Difference?

If institutions, government, and retail want to use stablecoins, they need a few things to be resolved from the ground up, which the Avalanche L1 stack has been proposing through the following trade-offs;

Purpose Built Scale When you want purpose-built scale, you need the readiness of the tech to meet any amount of scalability as and when needed.

Avalanche L1s for stablecoins are almost purpose-built because, unlike PoW/ BFT consensus engines, the Avalanche L1s use random sub-sampling. Due to this, instead of every validator having to validate for the blocks, a selected number of validators can simultaneously validate all the transactions coming. Due to this, Avalanche L1s are able to meet even 4500 TPS, almost equalling or surpassing Visa. Moreover, Avalanche has another major trade-off that you need when launching a stablecoin: the TTF or Time To Finality. Here as well, Avalanche L1s has left no stone unturned to end up as the perfect stack with sub-second finality due to its recent upgrades.

Extremely Economical Operations

When you are launching a stablecoin on top of a blockchain, you have to acknowledge the point that these coins are accounting for $1.48 trillion in transactions spread across DeFi, lending, and exchange platforms. That said, the infrastructure supporting the stablecoin should be such that it can accommodate such a scale at a fraction of the cost; otherwise, the whole purpose of using stablecoins will be defeated. For example, suppose you are performing all these transactions on blockchains like Ethereum, you will have to incur $61 M in fees. But the whole equation changes when your blockchain stack has such features to optimize massive scaling at a fraction of cost.

In this regard, Avalanche L1s make the difference because of the ACP-125 upgrade. Under ACP 125 upgrade, the fee reduction hits a critical point from 25 nAVAX to 1 nAVAX, which is like a 96% reduction in fees. So, if an institution/ government was spending supposedly $3,189 on gas fees other stack, now they will be spending $579 due to this upgrade, which is purpose-built to accommodate transactions at scale that stablecoins demand.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1933435072851607780-63'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1933435072851607780&theme=dark" }

Subnet Architecture for Custom Chains
Like it was said in the stablecoin then vs now section, Franklin Templeton had to manage compliance using ZeroHash, on Avalanche L1s, launching a stablecoin to use for any purpose wouldn’t have to go down that road because of the subnet architecture. The subnets will provide almost a custom application deployment environment which means you can integrate KYC/ AML, access control, role-based access, auditability, verifiability and privacy controls. And the best part would be that you are doing all of that without congesting the network or putting the performance at risk.

// Detect dark theme var iframe = document.getElementById('tweet-1958034162314801608-337'); if (document.body.className.includes('dark-theme')) { iframe.src = "https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?id=1958034162314801608&theme=dark" }

EVM Compatibility

With Avalanche L1s, you also get EVM compatibility while launching stablecoins. Which means, you do not have to think about liquidity bottlenecks because the tech infrastructure would be such that you can easily import liquidity from other ecosystems. For that matter, the Avalanche L1s would be helping in this regard by allowing the new stablecoins issued to partner with Avalanche Native DeFi protocols like DEXes, money markets like BENQI, and Yield Yak. Moreover, there’s also provision where you can bring in bootstrapped liquidity for your stablecoins on Avalanche by deploying different mechanisms like Native Tokens Incentives and other means to attract that and since the chain will be EVM compatible, other ecosystems can also tap into these offers.

Battle Tested Security

Last but not least, when you want the freedom to move value across borders, within the country and even empower merchant level adoption using stablecoins, security should be the tipping point to acknowledge. In this regard, Avalanche L1s are purpose built because of institutional participation as validator nodes to validate for the chains. Which means, if you want to put institutions as validators for your L1 chain for stablecoins, you can go ahead and do that with the Avalanche L1.

At the moment, top names like FiFa, Deloitte and Watr Foundation are validating for the Avalanche L1 chain. This is what as an institution or a government you need that your stack should provide peak security that Avalanche L1s are delivering from the grounds up for the Stablecoin launch.

Stablecoins have a long way to go because it is expected that they will touch $2 T by 2028. So, if you want to integrate the same in your business process and want reliable support to help in this regard, Zeeve can help you.

Launch Your Stablecoin on Avalanche L1s with Zeeve

Zeeve has been helping in simplifying the development of your stablecoins on Avalanche L1s (Formerly known as Subnets) using a wide range of tools and its own platform. So, if you want to build your own stablecoin as per your use-cases specific requirement, from rapid node & network setup to RPC configurations to validator node settings, Zeeve would be catering to all that your Avalanche L1 custom chain requires in a frugal manner without compelling you to undertake heavy investments for building the infrastructure.

In addition to this, Zeeve also offers a powerful Avalanche L1 management dashboard to give you detailed insights and a real-time view of your active L1s and their vital aspects, such as node performance, validators, account & access control configuration, as well as system-level monitoring.

With more than 30+ third-party integrations, you get everything to building your scalable stablecoin on Avalanche L1 custom chain. If you want to build your next stablecoin as soon as possible and don’t know how to get started with it, just speak to all our experts and we can help you launch your stablecoin on Avalanche for enterprise grade usage. For more information, Email us your queries or schedule a one-to-one call for an Avalanche L1 demo.