<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DEV Community: Zeiyre</title>
    <description>The latest articles on DEV Community by Zeiyre (@zeiyre).</description>
    <link>https://dev.to/zeiyre</link>
    
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://dev.to/feed/zeiyre"/>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>I Built 90 AI Prompts That Actually Work for Developers -- Here Are 5 Free Ones</title>
      <dc:creator>Zeiyre</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 22:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
      <link>https://dev.to/zeiyre/i-built-90-ai-prompts-that-actually-work-for-developers-here-are-5-free-ones-54mi</link>
      <guid>https://dev.to/zeiyre/i-built-90-ai-prompts-that-actually-work-for-developers-here-are-5-free-ones-54mi</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You already use AI for coding. But you probably do what most developers do: paste code, type "review this," and get back a wall of obvious comments about adding error handling and improving variable names.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That is not useful. That is a linter with a personality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I spent weeks building a collection of 90 structured prompts that produce genuinely useful AI output -- the kind that catches real bugs, generates comprehensive test cases, and gives you refactoring advice worth following. The difference is structure: specific instructions, clear categories, anti-pattern constraints, and severity levels that force the AI to think like a senior engineer instead of a helpful intern.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here are 5 prompts from the technical section. They are complete and ready to use. No teaser snippets, no "sign up to see the rest" -- these are the full prompts with placeholders you swap out.&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;h2&gt;
  
  
  1. The Code Review Prompt
&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most developers paste code and ask for a "review." The AI responds with surface-level observations. This prompt forces a structured review across five categories with severity levels -- the same way a staff engineer would review a pull request.&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;div class="highlight js-code-highlight"&gt;
&lt;pre class="highlight plaintext"&gt;&lt;code&gt;

Review this code for production readiness:

[PASTE YOUR CODE HERE]

Review for:
1. BUGS: Actual errors, edge cases that would crash, off-by-one errors,
   null/undefined risks
2. SECURITY: Injection vulnerabilities, exposed secrets, missing input
   validation, auth issues
3. PERFORMANCE: N+1 queries, unnecessary loops, missing indexes, memory
   leaks, unoptimized algorithms
4. MAINTAINABILITY: Naming clarity, function length, single responsibility,
   magic numbers, dead code
5. ERROR HANDLING: Missing try/catch, swallowed errors, unhelpful error
   messages, missing retries for network calls

For each issue found:
- Line number or code snippet
- Severity: CRITICAL / WARNING / SUGGESTION
- Explanation of why it's a problem
- Fixed code snippet

If no issues in a category, say "No issues foun
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;

</description>
      <category>ai</category>
      <category>prompts</category>
      <category>productivity</category>
      <category>webdev</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
