A space to discuss and keep up software development and manage your software career
An inclusive community for gaming enthusiasts
News and discussion of science and technology such as AI, VR, cryptocurrency, quantum computing, and more.
From composing and gigging to gear, hot music takes, and everything in between.
Discussing AI software development, and showing off what we're building.
Movie and TV enthusiasm, criticism and everything in-between.
A general discussion space for the Forem community. If it doesn't have a home elsewhere, it belongs here
Memes and software development shitposting
Web design, graphic design and everything in-between
A community of golfers and golfing enthusiasts
Your central hub for all things security. From ethical hacking and CTFs to GRC and career development, for beginners and pros alike
For engineers building software at scale. We discuss architecture, cloud-native, and SRE—the hard-won lessons you can't just Google
Discussing the core forem open source software project — features, bugs, performance, self-hosting.
A collaborative community for all things Crypto—from Bitcoin to protocol development and DeFi to NFTs and market analysis.
A place for parents to the share the joys, challenges, and wisdom that come from raising kids. We're here for them and for each other.
A community for makers, hobbyists, and professionals to discuss Arduino, Raspberry Pi, 3D printing, and much more.
Hi
If you are using CSS modules, you can use :global to target a CSS class name in a component.
for e.g.
/* sample.module.scss */ .wrapper :global(.a-class-inside-component) { padding: 1px; }
will be compiled to CSS similar to
.wrapper_<some_random_hash> .a-class-inside-component { padding: 1px; }
Hope this helps.
Great. It works. Thank you for your kindly help. Can you tell me .wrapper meaning? For me, it works with
:global(.a-class-inside-component) { padding: 1px; } Maybe .wrapper has other meaning? Thank you.
:global(.a-class-inside-component) { padding: 1px; }
And if using this method, I have to use !important to override component. Can you tell me if any other way is not using !important. Thank you.
Since
will be compiled to
.a-class-inside-component { padding: 1px; }
it will affect every components which uses class .a-class-inside-component globally.
.a-class-inside-component
If you want the CSS to be applied globally, this is alright. If you want to scope the CSS to 1 component only, it's recommended to use a wrapper class.
Thank you very much. Should I use !important in my custom modules.scss to override css? Is there any other way?
!important
Generally, it's considered a bad practice to use important. Don't use it unless you absolutely have to.
To avoid using important => stackoverflow.com/a/27443631/5599288
I will consider your words. Thank you for your kindly help. Hope good posts in the future. Regards!
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Hi
If you are using CSS modules, you can use :global to target a CSS class name in a component.
for e.g.
will be compiled to CSS similar to
Hope this helps.
Great. It works. Thank you for your kindly help.
Can you tell me .wrapper meaning?
For me, it works with
:global(.a-class-inside-component) {
padding: 1px;
}
Maybe .wrapper has other meaning?
Thank you.
And if using this method, I have to use !important to override component.
Can you tell me if any other way is not using !important.
Thank you.
Since
will be compiled to
it will affect every components which uses class
.a-class-inside-component
globally.If you want the CSS to be applied globally, this is alright.
If you want to scope the CSS to 1 component only, it's recommended to use a wrapper class.
Thank you very much.
Should I use
!important
in my custom modules.scss to override css?Is there any other way?
Generally, it's considered a bad practice to use important. Don't use it unless you absolutely have to.
To avoid using important => stackoverflow.com/a/27443631/5599288
I will consider your words.
Thank you for your kindly help.
Hope good posts in the future.
Regards!