Sure it's great to be able to leverage the Wordpress backend but, have you seen this new trend of statically generating the whole site? What's your opinion?
I was talking about axing WordPress. But IT IS a problem, because, while I like the static generation idea: is straightforward, no server needed, etc… it is not easy to integrate your editors into the workflow.
Sure it's great to be able to leverage the Wordpress backend but, have you seen this new trend of statically generating the whole site? What's your opinion?
Hey Alex, I think static generators are great depending on the site!
Are you talking about using WordPress but outputting a static version of the WordPress site? Or just axing WordPress altogether?
—J
I was talking about axing WordPress. But IT IS a problem, because, while I like the static generation idea: is straightforward, no server needed, etc… it is not easy to integrate your editors into the workflow.
Yeah, I've heard of some pretty elaborate setups for tying editors into a static workflow.