unit tests often test incidental as opposed to essential qualities of code. The more fine-grained a test is the more likely it tests incidentals. "Mockist" code seems to fall victim to this, except when used to stub out an external dependency.
valuable tests are super hard to deal with because they tend to include a lot of dependencies.
tests that communicate the "what" of what they are testing, but not the "why". this makes it really hard to know when a certain test can be changed or is no longer needed.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
unit tests often test incidental as opposed to essential qualities of code. The more fine-grained a test is the more likely it tests incidentals. "Mockist" code seems to fall victim to this, except when used to stub out an external dependency.
valuable tests are super hard to deal with because they tend to include a lot of dependencies.
tests that communicate the "what" of what they are testing, but not the "why". this makes it really hard to know when a certain test can be changed or is no longer needed.