One of the most powerful and vibrant business tools, the mobile application has become the new normal for developing a fast and powerful link with the clientele. It’s the essential mode of conducting present day business activities. But this also involves the specific need of the maintenance and development of mobile application too.
So, while going for a mobile application, companies have to make a distinct choice—the native vs. hybrid application development. Undoubtedly, both of them are quite appropriate for definite requirements. But the companies always face the dilemma, while choosing between native app and hybrid app. Which one is the better one? What are the pros and cons and how will be the performance and development?
Which One Suits Best?
The requirements will vary. So, rightfully speaking, there will be no straight answer for that.
Both of these approaches have their strength and weakness. Also, different enterprises have different goals, budget variance and time requirement. Then there are the stages of business life cycle and different marketing policies.
Both the hybrid and native app development approaches are thus equally important for diverse requirements of the companies.
Native App vs. Hybrid App: The Difference
While native applications are mainly two totally different types of software intended for use on the iOS or Android platforms, the hybrid applications are running the similar software with slight changes, on both the platforms.
The differentiation between the two, the native app and hybrid app are actually based on various criteria. The need and interests of the companies will define the right objective. And this native vs. hybrid app option will persuade the ultimate outcome. The entire choice is precisely dependant on the projects. Each type of these mobile applications will be just right for different use.
Seeing native vs. hybrid app performance, many swift app developers have agreed that the native mobile apps always provide enhanced performance.
Also when the company deals with financial activities, it is always preferable to opt for the native app for enhanced security.
Hybrid app development is noticeably budget-friendly. It’s less time consuming and saves money. One doesn’t have to keep different Android and iOS teams busy, on two different apps. The choice is hybrid mobile app , when it’s a straightforward user-oriented app development. A single team with proper expertise will be enough to create cross-platform software , working perfectly on different platforms.
To elaborate , native apps are mainly created on programming languages that can be maintained on a defined platform. For Android development, technologies like Java and Kotlin are used, and for iOS Objective-C and Swift are used.
Actually, the development procedure is the major differentiator in native vs. hybrid apps.
Native and Hybrid Apps : The Pros and Cons
In day to day activities, a ‘mobile app’ is often related to native applications —what we download from app stores to run various features on our devices, like camera, GPS, microphone,etc.
Let’s have a check of the native apps regarding software development.
In the native mobile apps, we have different versions for every operating system (OS) of Android or iOS. So, the native app needs different codebases to be developed for each OS (for Android and iOS).
Native app’s performance is much better. Though it’s not preferred for content-based apps using static data, like newsfeed or mobile banking, but for games and various animations, the performance is simply superb.
The security is the point, where the native apps are far ahead of its competitors. Native apps uses applications like two-factor authentication and can have its way into existing security features of a device.
Time and Cost
As the native app development process necessitates the development for several OS, it requires the engagement of different development teams, which will increase the time and cost, on the whole.
When the development process is sophisticated further, the maintenance needs more effort. But the native app is comparatively easier to test and debug, despite requiring different development teams.
Time and Cost
It takes noticeably lesser time and cost, and lesser efforts while creating.
A hybrid app is comparatively slower, compared to the native app.
Customisation is the Achilles heel of hybrid app. To add further custom features, the development becomes tougher and costlier.
Hybrid apps are easier to maintain, compared to native apps. But at the same time, hybrid apps generally require added time for identifying and fixing any problem.