Bringin' to attention SSGs for those who're not familiar yet is a good point and above all, a good matter to talk about. But i would not probably say that SSGs are a WordPress alternative, for many reasons. One above all: they're not comparable because are not the same thing.
Then a bunch of other reasons that come quickly in my mind:
SSGs are cool because they're fast but miss the elephant in the room: CMS.
Wordpress is gonna be an outdated technology very soon, unless they refactor the entire event-driven code and, most importantly, the DB structure. However, WordPress runs smootly; its plugins not, which are the most important problem of the WP ecosystem.
I worked many years for several companies that managed high-traffic WordPress websites and owned an entire editorial network. I cannot imagine the hundreds of journalists using a Markdown editor. I don't, really.
WordPress Caching is a thing and real. And it works.
Headless CMS + SSGs are the key, however.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Bringin' to attention SSGs for those who're not familiar yet is a good point and above all, a good matter to talk about. But i would not probably say that SSGs are a WordPress alternative, for many reasons. One above all: they're not comparable because are not the same thing.
Then a bunch of other reasons that come quickly in my mind:
Headless CMS + SSGs are the key, however.