"guys" is a general term that's been around for ages to describe a general audience ..if he had said "men" then that would be a different story.. I'm ok with guys.
The term "man" (from Proto-Germanic *mannaz or *manwaz "man, person") and words derived from it can designate any or even all of the human race regardless of their sex or age.
Not meaning to offend anyone here but we've lost our sense of history when we don't understand the meaning or origin of the words we use daily. The argument of why is it called man is so fueled by hate I wonder, about those who insist it's patriarchal archetype, if they have heard the phrase choose your battles
I agree that history is important but we're not talking about a historical document nor are we talking about a completely male audience. Considering the context, using "developer" instead of "guy" made more sense for the audience of this article, especially when many of the non-guys in that audience feel excluded. Language matters too.
Guys People get triggered with anything these days lmao.
I use the term "employment units", and nobody has complained.
Try using "resources", instead.
Bit impersonal for me
And "employment units" isn't?
Oh, wait. That's the joke, right? 😊
There's a thread about this topic here:
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
We strive for transparency and don't collect excess data.