I don't understand which part of my comment you don't understand. I showed text before and after. I quoted CoC. And you again asking me about Deepak Chopra. Help me to understand which part is unclear for you.
It is ok to criticize. It is not ok to assault. If you want to talk about Deepak Chopra make a separate post, present some evidence and find somebody to talk about Deepak Chopra... (Please stop constructing this strawman argument)
strawman
You misrepresented someone's argument to make it easier to attack.
By exaggerating, misrepresenting, or just completely fabricating someone's argument, it's much easier to present your own position as being reasonable, but this kind of dishonesty serves to undermine honest rational debate.
I don't follow Bob Martin work. I searched the internet for "uncle bob types" and now my tail is on fire. He is doing some blatant claims and when people show how he is wrong he compares apple to oranges and says "I don’t know. I’ll let you decide." Which is quite annoying.
Yet this is not a reason to go for assaults. It is ok to criticize though
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I don't understand which part of my comment you don't understand. I showed text before and after. I quoted CoC. And you again asking me about Deepak Chopra. Help me to understand which part is unclear for you.
It is ok to criticize. It is not ok to assault. If you want to talk about Deepak Chopra make a separate post, present some evidence and find somebody to talk about Deepak Chopra... (Please stop constructing this strawman argument)
I don't follow Bob Martin work. I searched the internet for "uncle bob types" and now my tail is on fire. He is doing some blatant claims and when people show how he is wrong he compares apple to oranges and says "I don’t know. I’ll let you decide." Which is quite annoying.
Yet this is not a reason to go for assaults. It is ok to criticize though