Personally, I think this is not a fair comparison. Nowadays vim has lots of customization options. Heck, you can search for "Vim as a full IDE" and several guides will come up.
However, I don't see much of improvements for nano. I guess because nano is not a realistic option for anyone to do any serious job, besides quickly edit a config file in a server (or any similar task).
A fairer match would be "vi vs nano". These two are by default in almost all linux distros, and both fulfill the same goal: to make quick changes.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Personally, I think this is not a fair comparison. Nowadays vim has lots of customization options. Heck, you can search for "Vim as a full IDE" and several guides will come up.
However, I don't see much of improvements for nano. I guess because nano is not a realistic option for anyone to do any serious job, besides quickly edit a config file in a server (or any similar task).
A fairer match would be "vi vs nano". These two are by default in almost all linux distros, and both fulfill the same goal: to make quick changes.