RPC vs REST: A Comprehensive Comparison
What is RPC?
RPC (Remote Procedure Call) allows a client to call a function on a remote server as if it were local, abstracting the complexity of network communication.
Key Components:
- Client and Server: The client makes the call; the server hosts and processes the request.
- Stub (Proxy): On the client side, it marshals arguments into a message; on the server side, it unpacks the message and executes the function.
- Request/Response: A client request triggers a server response.
- Serialization: Data is encoded/decoded for network transmission (e.g., JSON, Protobuf, Thrift).
How RPC Works:
- The client sends a request to the server with arguments.
- The server processes the request, executes the function, and returns the result.
Common Implementations:
- gRPC (HTTP/2 + Protobuf)
- JSON-RPC
- XML-RPC
What is REST?
REST (Representational State Transfer) is an architectural style for creating web services. It leverages HTTP protocols and treats entities (resources) as objects that can be manipulated via HTTP methods.
Key Components:
-
Resources: Identified by URIs (e.g.,
/users,/orders). -
HTTP Methods:
- GET (retrieve data)
- POST (submit data)
- PUT (update data)
- DELETE (remove data)
- Representation: Resources are represented in formats like JSON or XML.
- Statelessness: Every request is independent, containing all required information.
How REST Works:
- The client sends an HTTP request to the server via a URI.
- The server processes the request and returns a response (data or an action result).
Common Implementations:
- REST APIs in most modern web applications use JSON for data exchange.
Key Differences Between RPC and REST
| Aspect | RPC | REST |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Remote function call | Resource-oriented operations (CRUD) |
| Transport Protocol | Custom (e.g., HTTP, TCP) | HTTP only |
| Message Format | Varies (Protobuf, JSON, XML) | JSON, XML (mostly JSON) |
| Method of Operation | Invokes functions remotely | Operates on resources |
| State Management | Stateful or Stateless | Stateless |
| Flexibility | Tight coupling | Loose coupling |
| Performance | Often faster with binary protocols | Slower due to HTTP overhead |
| Scalability | Requires effort to scale | Easily scalable due to statelessness |
| Error Handling | Varies | Standard HTTP status codes |
When to Use RPC vs REST
Use RPC:
- Low-Latency Communication: Critical for high-speed service-to-service communication.
- Tight Coupling: Ideal for tightly integrated systems or microservices needing fast, efficient communication (e.g., gRPC in microservice architectures).
- Actions: Trigger server-side operations like taking a photo, transferring money, or processing complex calculations.
Use REST:
- Web Services & APIs: Best for building web services over HTTP.
- Resource-Oriented Design: Suitable for applications involving CRUD operations (e.g., adding products, retrieving lists).
- Scalability: Easily scalable due to stateless nature, especially for large, resource-driven applications.
Why REST Often Replaces RPC
While RPC allows direct function invocation, REST became popular due to its simplicity and alignment with web protocols. However, modern RPC implementations, like gRPC, are gaining traction in scenarios requiring high performance and client-server streaming.
Conclusion
Both RPC and REST have distinct strengths:
- RPC excels in low-latency, tightly coupled services.
- REST is more flexible and scalable, ideal for web services that focus on resource management.
Choosing between RPC and REST depends on your system’s architecture, communication patterns, and performance needs.
This guide outlines their differences and offers recommendations on when to use each approach, assisting developers in making informed architectural choices.
More Details:
Get all articles related to system design
Hastag: SystemDesignWithZeeshanAli
Git: https://github.com/ZeeshanAli-0704/SystemDesignWithZeeshanAli
Top comments (0)