Oh yeah, thanks!
I can give you another perspective for this: data analysts don't have code review, solid tests or QA engineers, we have to do it all by ourselves, every man for himself. So it makes sense to ship less.
But it backfires either way :)
Sure, that's right. But I was thinking a bit more general.
In my opinion, the brilliance of the sentence is how it humorously describes one of the biggest problems with software so simply in a few words! Software is fragile and it's important to understand.
Data doesn't stay the same (like users, technologies, vulnerabilities, regulations, etc.) so the code goes obsolete and broken.
Oh yeah, thanks!
I can give you another perspective for this: data analysts don't have code review, solid tests or QA engineers, we have to do it all by ourselves, every man for himself. So it makes sense to ship less.
But it backfires either way :)
Sure, that's right. But I was thinking a bit more general.
In my opinion, the brilliance of the sentence is how it humorously describes one of the biggest problems with software so simply in a few words! Software is fragile and it's important to understand.
Data doesn't stay the same (like users, technologies, vulnerabilities, regulations, etc.) so the code goes obsolete and broken.
Oh, didn’t think of that, thank you.
That an inspiring way to read that sentence.