You know the feeling. You push a PR, excited about the complex logic you just solved. You wait for a review.
Ping! A comment.
"Indentation is off here."
Ping! Another one.
"Missing trailing comma."
It's draining. You spend more time fixing style issues than discussing architecture. We've all been there—staring at 50+ files just to find formatting errors that a machine should have caught.
I built CodeProt to handle the noise so I can focus on the logic.
The Problem: Review Fatigue
When your team is growing, code reviews become a bottleneck. Senior engineers spend hours reviewing basic syntax instead of looking for security flaws or architectural inconsistencies. This leads to "LGTM" fatigue, where critical bugs slip through because the reviewer was too tired from pointing out missing semicolons.
The Solution: Automated Context-Aware Reviews
CodeProt isn't just another linter. It uses AI to understand the intent of your changes. It looks at the history of your project and your team's specific coding patterns to provide meaningful feedback.
It catches potential bugs and security issues before they even reach a human reviewer. This means when your colleague looks at your PR, they can focus on what you built, not how you formatted it.
How it Works
It integrates directly into your existing workflow (GitHub, GitLab, etc.). You don't need to change how you work; you just get better feedback, faster.
If you're tired of nitpicks and want to make your code reviews actually useful, give it a spin. It's designed to be a silent partner that only speaks up when it matters.
Top comments (0)