I am totally agree with your points here. And also i didn't like how they restricted to the images that are only hosted via github. Ig they did that to overcome that hash issue in urls. They might have thought that if they won't allow any other urls, there won't be any problems in using hash.
tbh its a very bad and untidy approach to simple thing. In my views either the query paramaters are good or specifying them as options like ![Dark](https://example.com/dark_img.png){theme = dark}.
Seems like its time to open an issue at the their support or in the github repo
In the community the actual guy who requested for the feature actually had suggested somewhat better approach but the GitHub doesn't seem to take his suggestions.
Some comments have been hidden by the post's author - find out more
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I am totally agree with your points here. And also i didn't like how they restricted to the images that are only hosted via github. Ig they did that to overcome that hash issue in urls. They might have thought that if they won't allow any other urls, there won't be any problems in using hash.
tbh its a very bad and untidy approach to simple thing. In my views either the query paramaters are good or specifying them as options like
![Dark](https://example.com/dark_img.png){theme = dark}
.Seems like its time to open an issue at the their support or in the github repo
In the community the actual guy who requested for the feature actually had suggested somewhat better approach but the GitHub doesn't seem to take his suggestions.