I was thinking and reading about building valuable software much more than building it
You got me here. Everything that followed seemed like a mirror of some of my darkest thoughts.
The only thing I disagree, so far, is the title. While I won't get into the full stack polemic nor talk about unicorns, I do believe there would have been much better choices. However, I only read the first part.
I’m glad you liked it! Maybe now is the time for some juicy Code then ;-)
And you’re right about the title. I actually wrote a Part O (trying to make a admittedly bad programmer joke) of this two weeks ago but of course it makes no sense for those who have not read it. I’ll edit this one to make that clearer. Thanks a lot!
You got me here. Everything that followed seemed like a mirror of some of my darkest thoughts.
The only thing I disagree, so far, is the title. While I won't get into the full stack polemic nor talk about unicorns, I do believe there would have been much better choices. However, I only read the first part.
I'm looking forward for what comes.
P.S. Thanks for sharing
I’m glad you liked it! Maybe now is the time for some juicy Code then ;-)
And you’re right about the title. I actually wrote a Part O (trying to make a admittedly bad programmer joke) of this two weeks ago but of course it makes no sense for those who have not read it. I’ll edit this one to make that clearer. Thanks a lot!
You can use the series feature provided by dev.to to link all parts together at the beginning of each article.
It would look like this (link provided only as an example to show how linked articles look like): dev.to/hoangbkit/become-a-fullstac...
It helps readers (like me) who get to part-x to see and easily navigate to the beginning of the journey