I tend to agree. It's nice to have "class" syntax if classes are what you actually want... But a lot of old-school devs saw that and said, "Oh, I guess we can do real OOP in JS now..." And JS is just fundamentally not object-oriented in the way that C# or Java are. It's silly to force that paradigm on a language that does so much more...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I tend to agree. It's nice to have "class" syntax if classes are what you actually want... But a lot of old-school devs saw that and said, "Oh, I guess we can do real OOP in JS now..." And JS is just fundamentally not object-oriented in the way that C# or Java are. It's silly to force that paradigm on a language that does so much more...