DEV Community

Discussion on: TypeScript 5.0: new mode bundler & ESM

Collapse
 
designbyonyx profile image
Ryan Wheale • Edited

The javascript ecosystem is trying to create a module specification that works in virtually any environment. There are numerous benefits to this - mostly centering around interoperability and consistency between different environments.

The decision by the nodejs people ... to have to explicitly specify the extension for imports ... makes no sense to me.

It wasn't node.js that added the requirement for the file extension - it was the EcmaScript specification itself... which affects all JS. Node isn't copying the browser... they are implementing the spec. The old CommonJS algorithm for finding files was terribly inefficient and was largely a mistake (the creator of node admitted this mistake: youtu.be/M3BM9TB-8yA?t=835). By being explicit, JS runtimes don't have to look for the file... which is much faster and more explicit and affords a lot of other efficiencies. Adding typescript even compounds the problem: typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/m...

As for the node REPL, it sucks it doesn't support ESM yet. I'm sure it will change soon. I generally use tsx to do most of my node REPL stuff - it's super fast and works with any flavor of JS or TS you are using.

If you are still writing code in CommonJS, I highly suggest you upgrade. You will be helping the community to move past CommonJS, and it is safe to do today. I just upgraded a large 6-year old codebase at a company who is resistant to change... and it went fairly smoothly once I got over the learning curve.