Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, no, please don't. master should be your canonical "we checked that this code works". If deleting master seems like a "good idea," the team workflow is seriously borked, and you need to get outside help to overhaul it.
Thanks for giving me perspective. I always enjoy these threads cause I'm never 100% sure of the approach but my lack of experience makes me real malleable
While I wasn't entirely certain which master he referred to, my concern stands in either case. See my replies to the other comment pointing out that he meant "delete local master".
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, no, please don't.
mastershould be your canonical "we checked that this code works". If deletingmasterseems like a "good idea," the team workflow is seriously borked, and you need to get outside help to overhaul it.Thanks for giving me perspective. I always enjoy these threads cause I'm never 100% sure of the approach but my lack of experience makes me real malleable
The author did not actually delete master on the remote repo, if that's what you're implying.
While I wasn't entirely certain which
masterhe referred to, my concern stands in either case. See my replies to the other comment pointing out that he meant "delete local master".Like how?