Hi Eric,
Very interesting your thoughts about paren density and meanful syntax. Clojure's use of vectors help a lot on both.
I have given up on the parens discussion, as I have been on the other side of the fence and no amount of reasoning would convince me.
Nowadays I just brush the discussion aside with "you will get over it and you will love it. What other concerns do you have with Clojure?"
Plenty of times the discussion ends there, and one less convert for the Church of Lisp.
Thanks a lot for the comments!
Dan
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Hi Eric,
Very interesting your thoughts about paren density and meanful syntax. Clojure's use of vectors help a lot on both.
I have given up on the parens discussion, as I have been on the other side of the fence and no amount of reasoning would convince me.
Nowadays I just brush the discussion aside with "you will get over it and you will love it. What other concerns do you have with Clojure?"
Plenty of times the discussion ends there, and one less convert for the Church of Lisp.
Thanks a lot for the comments!
Dan