When investors say “we’ve done tech due diligence,” it can mean very different things.
For some, it’s a quick scan of the repo and a few high-level questions to the CTO.
For others, it’s a deep, uncomfortable, but incredibly valuable, look at how the business actually runs under the hood.
At Dextralabs, we see this gap all the time. Deals that looked solid on paper start wobbling once architecture cracks, security blind spots, or product risks come into focus.
This article walks you inside a real technical due diligence, not the theoretical kind, but the kind that shapes valuations, deal terms, and post-close success.
What “Real” Tech Due Diligence Actually Means
A proper technical due diligence isn’t about judging whether the code is “pretty” or whether the team uses the latest framework.
It’s about answering three investor-grade questions:
- Will this technology scale with the business you’re buying?
- What could realistically break, and how badly?
- How much time and money will it take to fix what’s already broken?
To answer those, we focus on three core pillars:
- Architecture
- Security
- Product risk
Everything else flows from there.
1. Architecture: The Foundation You’re Actually Buying
Architecture is where most hidden risk lives, and where most post-acquisition pain begins.
What We Look At
In a real diligence, architecture isn’t reviewed in isolation. We look at how it behaves under pressure:
- Is the system modular, or tightly coupled?
- Can individual components scale independently?
- Are there clear boundaries between services, data, and responsibilities?
- How much of the system depends on tribal knowledge?
We’re not asking “does it work today?”
We’re asking “will it still work when revenue doubles, customers triple, or a new product line is added?”
Common Red Flags Investors Miss
- Monoliths that have grown too complex to change safely
- “Temporary” shortcuts that became permanent dependencies
- Heavy reliance on outdated frameworks that limit hiring options
- Architectures that only one or two engineers truly understand
None of these kill a deal on their own—but together, they directly impact valuation and integration timelines.
2. Security: Risk That Doesn’t Show Up in Financials (Until It Does)
Security is often treated as a checkbox. In reality, it’s one of the most asymmetric risks in any deal.
- A single incident can:
- Pause an acquisition
- Trigger regulatory scrutiny
- Damage customer trust overnight
What Real Security Diligence Covers
At Dextralabs, security diligence goes beyond surface scans:
- How access is managed across systems and environments
- Whether secrets, tokens, and credentials are handled safely
- How APIs are exposed and protected
- Data storage, encryption, and privacy controls
- Incident response readiness—not just policies
We also look at how security fits into daily engineering workflows. A secure system that no one follows in practice is still a risk.
The Investor Reality
Security issues rarely reduce valuation directly, but they do change deal dynamics:
- Escrows
- Representations and warranties
- Delayed closes
- Increased insurance costs
In some cases, they quietly shift leverage to the buyer.
3. Product Risk: Where Tech Meets the Business Model
Product risk is where technical decisions collide with revenue expectations.
It’s not about UI polish or feature checklists. It’s about whether the product can support the business plan investors are underwriting.
What We Evaluate
- Does the product roadmap align with the current architecture?
- Are promised features technically feasible within realistic timelines?
- Where are customers already feeling technical pain?
- How much effort goes into keeping the product stable versus improving it?
We pay close attention to customer feedback, especially complaints that hint at deeper technical issues like performance, reliability, or scalability.
Why This Matters in M&A
Product risk directly affects:
- Growth forecasts
- Customer retention
- Integration success for strategic buyers
If the product can’t evolve without major rework, future upside gets capped.
Translating Findings Into Business Impact
One of the biggest frustrations investors share with us is this:
“The technical report was accurate, but it didn’t help us make a decision.”
That’s why real tech due diligence doesn’t stop at findings. It connects them to outcomes.
At Dextralabs, we frame insights around:
- Risk exposure: What could go wrong, realistically?
- Cost implications: What will it take to fix?
- Opportunity unlocks: Where does cleanup enable growth?
- Return potential: How remediation improves valuation or exit multiples
This approach helps investors move from technical facts to investment clarity.
What Happens After the Report Matters Just as Much
The most effective diligence doesn’t end at signing.
Post-investment, the same insights can guide:
- CTO priorities
- Remediation roadmaps
- Governance models
- Integration planning in M&A scenarios
When handled well, technical due diligence becomes a value creation tool, not just a risk filter.
Final Thoughts
Real tech due diligence isn’t about perfection. Every company has trade-offs.
What separates good deals from bad ones is visibility.
When architecture risks are understood, security gaps are priced correctly, and product constraints are acknowledged early, investors stay in control of the outcome.
And in today’s market, control is often the difference between a smart acquisition and an expensive lesson.
Top comments (0)