So agree. I read this article with only thought - those explicit code, which author claims as junior's often is much more readable than suggested oneliners. And claims like "a real competent Python developer code" e.t.c are controversial for me. My experience reading code of a real highly experienced and clever professionals tells me that they usually tend to the simplest and most explicit solution possible. Their code is easy to read and understand. But tricky things usually appear because of ego and lack of self confidence as a professional. Real professional developer visible by his patterns, architecture and code style, not by some tricks.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
So agree. I read this article with only thought - those explicit code, which author claims as junior's often is much more readable than suggested oneliners. And claims like "a real competent Python developer code" e.t.c are controversial for me. My experience reading code of a real highly experienced and clever professionals tells me that they usually tend to the simplest and most explicit solution possible. Their code is easy to read and understand. But tricky things usually appear because of ego and lack of self confidence as a professional. Real professional developer visible by his patterns, architecture and code style, not by some tricks.