A space to discuss and keep up software development and manage your software career
An inclusive community for gaming enthusiasts
News and discussion of science and technology such as AI, VR, cryptocurrency, quantum computing, and more.
From composing and gigging to gear, hot music takes, and everything in between.
Discussing AI software development, and showing off what we're building.
A general discussion space for the Forem community. If it doesn't have a home elsewhere, it belongs here
Movie and TV enthusiasm, criticism and everything in-between.
Memes and software development shitposting
Web design, graphic design and everything in-between
A community of golfers and golfing enthusiasts
Your central hub for all things security. From ethical hacking and CTFs to GRC and career development, for beginners and pros alike
For engineers building software at scale. We discuss architecture, cloud-native, and SRE—the hard-won lessons you can't just Google
Discussing the core forem open source software project — features, bugs, performance, self-hosting.
A collaborative community for all things Crypto—from Bitcoin to protocol development and DeFi to NFTs and market analysis.
A place for parents to the share the joys, challenges, and wisdom that come from raising kids. We're here for them and for each other.
A community for makers, hobbyists, and professionals to discuss Arduino, Raspberry Pi, 3D printing, and much more.
If I am not mistaken, dot notation is supported too for matches call right? I find the object too verbose.
state.matches('grandparentStateNode.parentStateNode.childStateNode')
feels somewhat easier to read. Obviously it's not possible to type check correctly, so that's a disadvantage for sure.
Thank you for pointing out. I just recently learned about the dot notation and find it cleaner too.
I believe state.matches does not yet have strict type support. For the time being, it's just a matter of preference which syntax to use.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
If I am not mistaken, dot notation is supported too for matches call right? I find the object too verbose.
state.matches('grandparentStateNode.parentStateNode.childStateNode')feels somewhat easier to read. Obviously it's not possible to type check correctly, so that's a disadvantage for sure.
Thank you for pointing out. I just recently learned about the dot notation and find it cleaner too.
I believe state.matches does not yet have strict type support. For the time being, it's just a matter of preference which syntax to use.