DEV Community

Discussion on: brooks-lint: AI Code Reviews Grounded in 12 Classic Engineering Books — Now on Gemini CLI Spotlight

Collapse
 
hyhmrright profile image
hyhmrright

Exactly — that was the core design goal. Vague feedback is easy to dismiss, but when a finding is backed by a specific chapter from Ousterhout or Fowler, it's much harder to ignore and way easier to act on.

If you're interested in helping shape where this goes next — more book sources, language-specific heuristics, IDE integration — I'd love to have you involved. Feel free to open an issue or drop a comment on GitHub: github.com/hyhmrright/brooks-lint