Isn't ORM kind of a SQL architecture? Developers try to framework and bootstrap all kinds of things.
The problems we have now with CSS (and html for that reason) revolve around componentization as a means to master complexity. Thats an aspect that simply wasn't important when those languages were designed, because websites weren't meant to be as complex as they're now.
In that sense, I'd argue we didn't go too far with CSS, we did go too far with websites.
Also, most web projects don't need to be a complex web app and most of the architectural problems we have now are self made and unnecessary.
P.S. I like your latest attempts on discussing CSS. Keep it going! :)
Isn't ORM kind of a SQL architecture? Developers try to framework and bootstrap all kinds of things.
The problems we have now with CSS (and html for that reason) revolve around componentization as a means to master complexity. Thats an aspect that simply wasn't important when those languages were designed, because websites weren't meant to be as complex as they're now.
In that sense, I'd argue we didn't go too far with CSS, we did go too far with websites.
Also, most web projects don't need to be a complex web app and most of the architectural problems we have now are self made and unnecessary.
P.S. I like your latest attempts on discussing CSS. Keep it going! :)
Not in my opinion. This is rather translation layer. It is closer to SASS if we can compare it.
Thanks)