For a long time, I thought the problem was me.
I followed the rules. Budget this way. Save that percentage. Track everything. Avoid these categories. Optimize those numbers. When it didn’t work, I assumed I lacked discipline.
What I actually lacked was fit.
The rules weren’t built for my life.
Financial rules assume a fictional person
Most personal finance rules are written for an idealized version of someone:
- Stable income
- Predictable expenses
- High energy and attention
- No major life disruptions
That person rarely exists.
When your income fluctuates, your schedule is uneven, or your energy varies week to week, rigid rules don’t guide you — they punish you.
Rules break when life gets messy
Rules work best in controlled environments.
Real life isn’t controlled.
Unexpected expenses show up. Motivation dips. Priorities change. When rules don’t adapt, every deviation feels like failure — even when nothing is actually wrong.
The system doesn’t bend. You do.
And that’s exhausting.
Following rules increased guilt, not stability
The biggest cost wasn’t financial.
It was emotional.
Every “rule break” triggered guilt. Spending felt like misbehavior. Adjustments felt like backsliding. Instead of reducing stress, the rules made me hyper-aware of everything I was doing “wrong.”
Money became moralized instead of functional.
The issue wasn’t discipline — it was design
Once I stopped blaming myself, the problem became obvious.
Rules required perfect behavior. My life didn’t offer that.
I didn’t need stricter rules. I needed systems that:
- Worked with variable income
- Absorbed bad weeks
- Reduced decision-making
- Recovered quickly from mistakes
That shift changed everything.
Custom systems outperform universal rules
When I redesigned my finances around how I actually live, things stabilized.
Instead of rigid percentages, I used buffers.
Instead of constant tracking, I used automation.
Instead of rules that assumed consistency, I built margin for inconsistency.
The system stopped fighting my life.
Flexibility created more consistency
This was the paradox.
Once the system fit my reality, I followed it naturally. Not because I forced myself to — but because it didn’t demand more than I could give.
Consistency emerged from compatibility.
Why fit matters more than correctness
There is no objectively “correct” money system.
There is only a system that works — or doesn’t — in the context of your life.
This is the philosophy behind Finelo: helping people move away from one-size-fits-all rules and toward money systems designed around real constraints, real energy, and real lives.
Because personal finance isn’t about following rules perfectly.
It’s about building something that still works when your life doesn’t look like the example in the book.
Top comments (0)