Although is an elegant solution, you are just replacing a boolean loading for a state loading, as each element need a different variable to track it's loading state in both cases.
Indeed it's not a time saver, you don't use less code. However, the proposed way is, in my opinion, for easier readability, extensibility and consistency by using a single variable with a better naming to handle a common "async action state", including the error state that is sometime forgotten 😅
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Although is an elegant solution, you are just replacing a boolean loading for a state loading, as each element need a different variable to track it's loading state in both cases.
Thanks a lot for the comment ! :)
Indeed it's not a time saver, you don't use less code. However, the proposed way is, in my opinion, for easier readability, extensibility and consistency by using a single variable with a better naming to handle a common "async action state", including the error state that is sometime forgotten 😅