Elm's architecture in 0.19 for making SPAs significantly improved. They improved the developer's abilities to make a SPA that worked a little more seamlessly.
The only real downside to 0.19 was the fact that every owner of every Elm package had to recompile against 0.19 for it to be compatible with the latest version. I remember for a lot of people who wanted to use 0.19, they had to wait until their favorite libraries could be 0.19 compatible.
I am Software Developer, currently interested in static type languages (TypeScript, Elm, ReScript) mostly in the frontend land, but working actively in Python also. I am available for mentoring.
No, not exactly I was right, Elm 19 removed possibility for own operators and using binary functions as infix. Just found it out that release notes did not say anything about that. There was major community argument about these. I also see that move as at least problematic.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Elm's architecture in 0.19 for making SPAs significantly improved. They improved the developer's abilities to make a SPA that worked a little more seamlessly.
The only real downside to 0.19 was the fact that every owner of every Elm package had to recompile against 0.19 for it to be compatible with the latest version. I remember for a lot of people who wanted to use 0.19, they had to wait until their favorite libraries could be 0.19 compatible.
No, not exactly I was right, Elm 19 removed possibility for own operators and using binary functions as infix. Just found it out that release notes did not say anything about that. There was major community argument about these. I also see that move as at least problematic.