Full-time web dev; JS lover since 2002; CSS fanatic. #CSSIsAwesome
I try to stay up with new web platform features. Web feature you don't understand? Tell me! I'll write an article!
He/him
All depends on how complex you want your parser to be, I guess. Personally I'm not sold on a shell-command-like format, especially considering that it would be kind of annoying to build that string in JS I think. Would you specify just certain header options that can be specified with this shorthand?
I personally like the Header-Name: header-value syntax because it's very easy to parse into an Object, and its very easy to serialize an Object into that format. But it's all subjective; it's just a prototype, right? Have fun with it, try it out, use it for a project, see what you like and dislike
All depends on how complex you want your parser to be, I guess. Personally I'm not sold on a shell-command-like format, especially considering that it would be kind of annoying to build that string in JS I think. Would you specify just certain header options that can be specified with this shorthand?
I personally like the
Header-Name: header-valuesyntax because it's very easy to parse into an Object, and its very easy to serialize an Object into that format. But it's all subjective; it's just a prototype, right? Have fun with it, try it out, use it for a project, see what you like and dislikeI agree with you