Full-time web dev; JS lover since 2002; CSS fanatic. #CSSIsAwesome
I try to stay up with new web platform features. Web feature you don't understand? Tell me! I'll write an article!
He/him
I don't know, IMO the for loop versions you wrote are far more readable than the reduce version. I typically find that to be true of for vs reduce, which is I think the point of these arguments.
(Unimportant pedantic nitpick: I think you meant to write for ... of rather than for ... in, since in loops over keys rather than values.)
That's fair! TBTH I'm sort of coming back around on using for loops over .reduce(), async iterators are really nice to use for request throttling and flow control, last project I used them in I was a bit taken aback by how intuitive they felt to use once I got into it (I've never been a huge fan of generators but I'm starting to see their value more now after that).
And yes, I definitely meant for ... of — I get that wrong so often! 😅
Full-time web dev; JS lover since 2002; CSS fanatic. #CSSIsAwesome
I try to stay up with new web platform features. Web feature you don't understand? Tell me! I'll write an article!
He/him
I don't know, IMO the
forloop versions you wrote are far more readable than thereduceversion. I typically find that to be true offorvsreduce, which is I think the point of these arguments.(Unimportant pedantic nitpick: I think you meant to write
for ... ofrather thanfor ... in, sinceinloops over keys rather than values.)That's fair! TBTH I'm sort of coming back around on using for loops over .reduce(), async iterators are really nice to use for request throttling and flow control, last project I used them in I was a bit taken aback by how intuitive they felt to use once I got into it (I've never been a huge fan of generators but I'm starting to see their value more now after that).
And yes, I definitely meant
for ... of— I get that wrong so often! 😅Ha, same! Especially if I've been writing Python recently, since Python's loop syntax is
for x in arr: ...