DEV Community

Cover image for NEAR vs. TON: The Messy Reality of Mainstream Blockchain Adoption
Kofi ccazz
Kofi ccazz

Posted on

NEAR vs. TON: The Messy Reality of Mainstream Blockchain Adoption

The "First Contract" Wake-Up Call

TON’s Fun Surprises:

  • "Just use FunC!" they said... until you realize it’s a custom language with IDE support from 2003
  • Testnet? More like "guessnet" – the local emulator crashes if you look at it wrong
  • Wallet integration? Hope you enjoy reverse-engineering Telegram’s bot API

NEAR’s JavaScript Illusion:

  • near-sdk-js feels like cheating... until you need to optimize gas costs
  • Human-readable accounts (@yourname.near) save UX... until you hit permission limitations
  • Sandbox testing works great – unless your contract uses cross-shard calls

First Week Verdict:

TON makes you feel like you’re hacking Soviet mainframes

NEAR makes you feel productive – until you hit missing tooling


The Scalability Tradeoffs Nobody Discusses

TON’s "Infinite Sharding" Reality:

Theoretical throughput – Millions of TPS!

In practice – Your workchain gets congested anyway

Debugging – Tracing transactions across shards requires KGB-level investigation

NEAR’s Sharding Compromise:

Automatic resharding – No manual partitioning

Cold storage – Retrieving old shard data feels like archeology

Gas estimation – Cross-shard calls break all predictions

Cold Hard Truth:

Both chains solve scaling... by making debugging 10x harder


The Wallet Onboarding War

TON’s Telegram Advantage:

  • 800M users! (Too bad your dApp needs 17 bot interactions to work)
  • "Seamless auth!" (Unless you want actual private key control)
  • Transaction speeds are blazing... when Telegram’s API isn’t rate-limiting you

NEAR’s Web3 Reality:

  • @yourname.near beats cryptic addresses
  • Wallet fragmentation is real (5+ wallets all with missing features)
  • Sponsored transactions work... until you calculate the prepaid gas costs

UX Irony:

TON is centralized through Telegram

NEAR is decentralized... but users still need education


The Uncomfortable Truth

After shipping on both:

  • TON is Web2.5 disguised as blockchain
  • NEAR is what Ethereum should’ve been – if it had better tooling Choose based on your pain tolerance: TON’s walled garden or NEAR’s incomplete toolbox

When To Choose Which? (No Corporate BS)

Build on TON When:

  • You need Telegram’s userbase more than decentralization
  • Your team enjoys masochistic programming languages
  • You don’t care about censorship resistance

Build on NEAR When:

  • You want actual Web3 UX (not bot commands)
  • Your designers refuse to explain seed phrases
  • You value developer sanity over theoretical scale

Top comments (0)