The "First Contract" Wake-Up Call
TON’s Fun Surprises:
- "Just use FunC!" they said... until you realize it’s a custom language with IDE support from 2003
- Testnet? More like "guessnet" – the local emulator crashes if you look at it wrong
- Wallet integration? Hope you enjoy reverse-engineering Telegram’s bot API
NEAR’s JavaScript Illusion:
-
near-sdk-jsfeels like cheating... until you need to optimize gas costs - Human-readable accounts (@yourname.near) save UX... until you hit permission limitations
- Sandbox testing works great – unless your contract uses cross-shard calls
First Week Verdict:
TON makes you feel like you’re hacking Soviet mainframes
NEAR makes you feel productive – until you hit missing tooling
The Scalability Tradeoffs Nobody Discusses
TON’s "Infinite Sharding" Reality:
✅ Theoretical throughput – Millions of TPS!
❌ In practice – Your workchain gets congested anyway
❌ Debugging – Tracing transactions across shards requires KGB-level investigation
NEAR’s Sharding Compromise:
✅ Automatic resharding – No manual partitioning
❌ Cold storage – Retrieving old shard data feels like archeology
❌ Gas estimation – Cross-shard calls break all predictions
Cold Hard Truth:
Both chains solve scaling... by making debugging 10x harder
The Wallet Onboarding War
TON’s Telegram Advantage:
- 800M users! (Too bad your dApp needs 17 bot interactions to work)
- "Seamless auth!" (Unless you want actual private key control)
- Transaction speeds are blazing... when Telegram’s API isn’t rate-limiting you
NEAR’s Web3 Reality:
- @yourname.near beats cryptic addresses
- Wallet fragmentation is real (5+ wallets all with missing features)
- Sponsored transactions work... until you calculate the prepaid gas costs
UX Irony:
TON is centralized through Telegram
NEAR is decentralized... but users still need education
The Uncomfortable Truth
After shipping on both:
- TON is Web2.5 disguised as blockchain
-
NEAR is what Ethereum should’ve been – if it had better tooling
Choose based on your pain tolerance:
TON’s walled garden or NEAR’s incomplete toolbox
When To Choose Which? (No Corporate BS)
Build on TON When:
- You need Telegram’s userbase more than decentralization
- Your team enjoys masochistic programming languages
- You don’t care about censorship resistance
Build on NEAR When:
- You want actual Web3 UX (not bot commands)
- Your designers refuse to explain seed phrases
- You value developer sanity over theoretical scale




Top comments (0)