Sorry, I am still a bit confused. Could you please share results both for Deno 1.25 in normal and experimental mode? If I got you right, using smth like real-world-app shows no performance gain. May be this is due to the fact, that in experimental mode Deno is only capable of http/1.1, which is not important for hello world app... and it still outperform http/2 web server for a full fledged app...
Here are the results before and after - before is on (I believe) Deno 1.24, after is on Deno 1.25 with experimental mode github.com/BuilderIO/framework-ben...
But what I’m trying to say is the server speed is not usually the main bottleneck for a real world application. Most CPU cycles are spent on the business logic of the application, rather than the details of the server implementation
All that said all of the code is open source so you are more than welcome to replicate the results yourself too in any way you like and/or send PRs for feedback and improvements
Deno and Bun are almost twice as fast as Node for your app... with no change in business logic for all cases. So your results do not support the claim, that "Most CPU cycles are spent on the business logic". Is it possible somehow to profile, where main CPU power really goes?
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Sorry, I am still a bit confused. Could you please share results both for Deno 1.25 in normal and experimental mode? If I got you right, using smth like real-world-app shows no performance gain. May be this is due to the fact, that in experimental mode Deno is only capable of http/1.1, which is not important for hello world app... and it still outperform http/2 web server for a full fledged app...
Here are the results before and after - before is on (I believe) Deno 1.24, after is on Deno 1.25 with experimental mode github.com/BuilderIO/framework-ben...
But what I’m trying to say is the server speed is not usually the main bottleneck for a real world application. Most CPU cycles are spent on the business logic of the application, rather than the details of the server implementation
All that said all of the code is open source so you are more than welcome to replicate the results yourself too in any way you like and/or send PRs for feedback and improvements
Deno and Bun are almost twice as fast as Node for your app... with no change in business logic for all cases. So your results do not support the claim, that "Most CPU cycles are spent on the business logic". Is it possible somehow to profile, where main CPU power really goes?