DEV Community

Discussion on: Functional Programming Principles in JavaScript

Collapse
 
jonrandy profile image
Jon Randy ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ • Edited

JS is fun...

const squareIt = (number) => {
    return number * number;
}
const myInput = { valueOf() { return performance.now() }}

console.log(squareIt(myInput)) // 6046681
console.log(squareIt(myInput)) // 6056521
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Pure(?) function - same input, different outputs ๐Ÿ‘

Kind of a 'trick' - I know - but the input is identical each time. Because of this, in the strictest sense, it can be considered that functions such as these are not pure - as there are possible inputs that will wreck the purity.

Collapse
 
architectak profile image
Ankit Kumar

const squareIt = (number) => {
    return number * number;
}
const myInput = { valueOf() { return performance.now() }}

console.log(performance.now()) // 132161.5
console.log(squareIt(myInput)) // 17466767811.611576
console.log(performance.now()) // 132162
console.log(squareIt(myInput)) // 17466847108.83685

Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

JS is fun, since input is changing its value on each call, hence output is different

Collapse
 
jonrandy profile image
Jon Randy ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ • Edited

But the input to the function is the same. The calculation differs because of coercion that happens as a feature if JS. The inputs themselves are unchanged. The input in this case is an object with a single method.

Thread Thread
 
architectak profile image
Ankit Kumar

In input of function is function that keeps changes its value, then that function can not be considered as pure function, right ?

Thread Thread
 
jonrandy profile image
Jon Randy ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ • Edited

The input is an object, but it's value upon coercion to a number differs on each coercion. In a very strict sense, such a simple function could be considered impure. To make it strictly pure in JS, you could add a bunch of code checking types etc.

Collapse
 
jackmellis profile image
Jack

Put simply, the input itself is impure. The valueOf getter uses performance.now which is external state (calling valueOf with the same inputs does not return the same result every time). When you introduce impure inputs then youโ€™ve already broken the fp paradigm.