Very cool article. I really appreciate it, especially that you added further readings.
There is just one thing, I think it's missing and that is the risk that if you deploy the services to a single host and that host dies, your whole application is not working anymore. If you deploy every service to a single host, you can still run the others services when one of them crashes.
Hi @lweiner
Actually, if the physical host risks to go down, the only available options (That came to my mind) are:
Deploy each service in a separate physical host (Which will cost a lot)
Deploy other instances of the entire system into other physical hosts and use a Load balancer so that when a server goes down your application is still working.
What do you think, do you have better options?
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Very cool article. I really appreciate it, especially that you added further readings.
There is just one thing, I think it's missing and that is the risk that if you deploy the services to a single host and that host dies, your whole application is not working anymore. If you deploy every service to a single host, you can still run the others services when one of them crashes.
Hi @lweiner
Actually, if the physical host risks to go down, the only available options (That came to my mind) are:
What do you think, do you have better options?