DEV Community

Cover image for Learning Rust Feels Slow at First
Marie Colvin
Marie Colvin

Posted on

Learning Rust Feels Slow at First

How a language teaches you to pay attention

When you first open a Rust file, nothing feels familiar in a comforting way. The syntax is readable, but the compiler speaks back immediately. It does not wait for you to be confident. It responds as soon as you make a decision. Sometimes before you even understand why you made it.

I noticed this feeling while sitting at my desk late one evening, the room lit softly by a lamp and a custom neon sign I had stopped actively noticing months ago. It did not demand attention anymore. It simply existed as part of the environment. Rust felt similar. Present. Observant. Quietly responsive.

At the beginning, this can feel discouraging. You write a few lines. You press run. The program does not compile. The message is long. It is precise. It tells you something is wrong, but not in the vague way many languages do. It points directly at the choice you just made.

I remember thinking I was doing something wrong. Not because the code was broken, but because Rust kept asking me to explain myself. Why does this variable change. Who owns this value. How long should it live. These were questions I was not used to answering.

Most beginner tutorials start with printing text to the screen. Rust does this too.

fn main() {
    println!("Hello, world");
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This works. It feels safe. For a moment, Rust is quiet.

Then you try to store something.

let x = 5;
x = 6;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

The compiler responds. It tells you that x is immutable. It does not say this to be strict. It says it because you did not ask for change. You did not say you wanted movement. You did not say the value should shift.

So you rewrite it.

let mut x = 5;
x = 6;
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Now it runs. Not because you fought the language, but because you spoke clearly.

This is where Rust begins to teach its rhythm. It wants you to be specific. Not fast. Not clever. Just clear.

Ownership is usually the point where people pause. It sounds abstract. It feels theoretical. But it shows up in simple places.

let s = String::from("hello");
let t = s;
println!("{}", s);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This does not work. The value moved. Rust does not let you pretend otherwise. It does not allow two places to assume responsibility for the same thing without agreement.

At first, this feels limiting. But after some time, it feels honest. The language reflects how memory actually behaves. One owner. Clear lifetimes. No silent copying.

You start writing code more slowly. You think before passing values. You choose references deliberately.

let s = String::from("hello");
let t = &s;
println!("{}", s);
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

This works. Not because it is simpler, but because it matches intent. You are not giving the value away. You are allowing access.

Over time, this way of thinking settles in. You stop guessing. You stop trying things just to see if they work. You describe what you want to happen, and the compiler helps you confirm it.

Rust errors begin to feel less like rejection and more like conversation. The messages explain. They suggest. They wait for you to adjust your thinking rather than your syntax.

This changes how coding feels. You are not rushing to a result. You are building understanding line by line. Each decision stays visible.

There is a quiet confidence that grows from this. When a Rust program compiles, it often works the way you expect. Not because you tested every edge case, but because the language asked you to confront many of them upfront.

Rust does not try to be friendly in a casual way. It is friendly in a patient way. It assumes you are capable of learning. It assumes you care about correctness. It gives you time to align with it.

For beginners, this can feel heavy. But it is also grounding. You are not relying on hidden behavior. You are not hoping the runtime fixes your mistakes later.

You are present with your code.

Eventually, you stop noticing the rules as rules. They become habits. You name things more carefully. You pass data with intention. You notice lifetimes without counting them.

The language stops feeling strict. It starts feeling supportive.

Learning Rust is not about speed. It is about attention. It teaches you to slow down, to notice what your code is actually doing, and to take responsibility for it.

In the same way, a personalized neon sign stops being something you look at and becomes something that simply belongs, Rust stops being something you fight and becomes something you trust.

That change happens quietly. One decision. One message. One moment of understanding at a time.

Top comments (0)