The transition from the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) has fundamentally changed day-to-day criminal court practice. While the statute book has moved on, much of the working reality in magistrate and sessions courts still carries the imprint of CrPC-based drafting.
This gap between old procedural references and new statutory expectations is where confusion, objections, and delays arise. For lawyers practicing in trial courts, accurate CrPC to BNSS mapping is no longer an academic exercise—it is a daily necessity.
Why Magistrate & Sessions Courts Feel the Transition the Most
Unlike appellate courts, magistrate and sessions courts handle:
FIR-based proceedings
remand and custody matters
bail applications
cognizance and charge framing
summons, warrants, and trial procedure
These are procedural stages, and procedure is now governed by BNSS—not CrPC.
A wrong citation here doesn’t just look outdated; it directly affects the court’s ability to pass orders.
Common CrPC-Based Errors Seen in Trial Courts
Despite BNSS being in force, courts still encounter:
bail applications citing Sections 437 or 439 CrPC without BNSS mapping
remand arguments relying on Section 167 CrPC alone
summons and warrants drafted under CrPC provisions
orders prepared using old section numbers
These errors often result in:
judicial queries
objections by the opposite side
directions to “correct and refile”
unnecessary adjournments
All of this slows down case flow.
Why Mapping Is Not Simple Renumbering
A major misconception is that BNSS is just CrPC with new numbers. It is not.
Under BNSS:
several procedural provisions are restructured
some CrPC sections are split or combined
terminology has been modernised
timelines and safeguards have been refined
This means a lawyer cannot safely assume:
“This CrPC section must exist somewhere under BNSS.”
Accurate mapping requires verification.
Key Stages Where CrPC to BNSS Mapping Matters
- FIR & Investigation Stage While FIRs may still mention CrPC sections due to legacy formats, court filings must reflect BNSS awareness, especially during:
remand hearings
police custody applications
A magistrate cannot rely on a repealed procedural provision.
- Bail Proceedings Bail is the most time-sensitive stage in criminal courts.
Incorrect procedural citations:
invite objections
delay hearing
weaken the urgency of relief
Mapping ensures:
clean, BNSS-compliant bail applications
immediate answers to judicial queries
- Cognizance & Summons Orders issuing process must rest on current procedural law. Wrong citations here can:
stall issuance of summons
create future challenges
reflect poorly on drafting quality
- Framing of Charges & Trial At the sessions level, charge framing and trial procedure must align with BNSS structure. Mapping helps ensure:
correct procedural foundation
consistency across trial stages
Why Manual Mapping Fails in Daily Court Practice
Many lawyers rely on:
printed comparison tables
WhatsApp-forwarded PDFs
memory of CrPC sections
These methods fail because:
they are often outdated
they do not explain structural changes
they are impractical during live hearings
Trial courts demand instant clarity.
How a CrPC to BNSS Mapping Tool Helps
A reliable mapping tool allows lawyers to:
instantly find the correct BNSS provision
verify procedural sections before filing
avoid objections and adjournments
respond confidently to judicial questions
Instead of saying, “I’ll check and mention,” you can proceed with certainty.
Best Practice for Magistrate & Sessions Court Drafting
Step 1: Identify All Procedural References
Even minor CrPC mentions can trigger objections.
Step 2: Convert to BNSS Before Drafting
Do not convert after writing—start with correct sections.
Step 3: Use Transitional Citation Where Needed
For pending cases, clarity helps:
“Under Section ___ BNSS, 2023 (corresponding to Section ___ CrPC, 1973)”
Step 4: Update Templates Once
Most errors repeat because templates remain unchanged.
Why Juniors Benefit the Most from Mapping Tools
Young advocates face:
closer judicial scrutiny
frequent drafting responsibilities
pressure to avoid mistakes
Using a mapping tool:
improves drafting quality
reduces senior corrections
builds courtroom confidence
What Courts Expect—Not Punish
Courts are not looking to penalise lawyers for past habits. They simply expect:
awareness of BNSS
procedural correctness
effort to comply with the new law
Mapping demonstrates professionalism.
Final Takeaway
For magistrate and sessions courts, procedure is everything.
Wrong CrPC citations:
delay hearings
invite objections
weaken credibility
Accurate CrPC to BNSS mapping:
keeps cases moving
builds judicial trust
reflects modern legal practice
In today’s criminal courts, the smartest way forward is simple:
Map before you cite. Draft with BNSS clarity. Practice without delay.For more details, you can refer to CrPC to BNSS Converter
Top comments (0)