I’m not sure you understand. I’m commenting on your comment. You suggested to use Boolean(showConditionText) instead of the raw variable: showConditionText. I’m only pointing out that !!showConditionText is a more concise syntax of Boolean(showConditionText). Pre-pending any variable with !! Is implicitly coercing it to a Boolean. Further more Boolean() only takes one argument so I’m not sure how it handles more “complex” comparisons?
Complex means more than one variable. Often goes with && or ||
For example Boolean(a && b && c). In order to write !!(a && b && c), if you start with !!a you need to add “(” before a and add b c after a and I dont like that. I just want to put the cursor inside the “()” and write new variables.
If you understand my comment, you’ll know I talk about the possibility of expanding the code from simple to be more complex logic.
@mr chedda
The first one is too many !!
The second one, is funny, because I literally gave my example above. How could you see my example and come up with that?
If you mean “result in” is how the computer sees it, all of your examples, my examples and Ryan’s examples, are the same to the computer.
And if you mean “result in” is the way that I actually write it. I will write it again and hope you can get it
Lê.... Maybe it's because English is NOT your first language but the two statements I wrote are programmatically equivalent but your syntax is written in a more beginner way.
You likely WILL NOT see this in a production code base written by senior developers.
You likely WILL see this syntax in a production code base written by senior developers:
((!!a&&!!b&&!!c)||!!d)&&<Component/>
I don't know how I can make it any clearer.... the two statements are saying THE EXACT SAME THING... the difference is your suggestion using Boolean() would likely be written by a beginner programmer.
You wrote an example with multiple “Boolean()” and assume I came up with that, when in two of my examples, multiple variables inside just one “Boolean()”
repeated what I said about “the exact same thing”, yes the computer would understand them the same way, we’re talking about Coding style, the convenient of upgrading the code to more complex logic.
Didnt have any reply to my “too many !!”. Made an execuse the seniors are using it, production code.. bla bla
Personal attack about English not my native language, beginner level
Keep it up, you’re doing real great. Dont worry too much, I’ve been through many years of js development, your comments and your capital letters wont make me a beginner.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I’m not sure you understand. I’m commenting on your comment. You suggested to use
Boolean(showConditionText)
instead of the raw variable:showConditionText
. I’m only pointing out that!!showConditionText
is a more concise syntax ofBoolean(showConditionText)
. Pre-pending any variable with!!
Is implicitly coercing it to aBoolean
. Further moreBoolean()
only takes one argument so I’m not sure how it handles more “complex” comparisons?Complex means more than one variable. Often goes with && or ||
For example Boolean(a && b && c). In order to write !!(a && b && c), if you start with !!a you need to add “(” before a and add b c after a and I dont like that. I just want to put the cursor inside the “()” and write new variables.
If you understand my comment, you’ll know I talk about the possibility of expanding the code from simple to be more complex logic.
That's not what your suggestion was but in that case it would simply be
Your suggestion above would result in
which is not efficient nor concise
@mr chedda
The first one is too many !!
The second one, is funny, because I literally gave my example above. How could you see my example and come up with that?
If you mean “result in” is how the computer sees it, all of your examples, my examples and Ryan’s examples, are the same to the computer.
And if you mean “result in” is the way that I actually write it. I will write it again and hope you can get it
Boolean((a && b && c) || d) &&
Lê.... Maybe it's because English is NOT your first language but the two statements I wrote are programmatically equivalent but your syntax is written in a more beginner way.
You likely WILL NOT see this in a production code base written by senior developers.
You likely WILL see this syntax in a production code base written by senior developers:
I don't know how I can make it any clearer.... the two statements are saying THE EXACT SAME THING... the difference is your suggestion using
Boolean()
would likely be written by a beginner programmer.So your comment is about:
You wrote an example with multiple “Boolean()” and assume I came up with that, when in two of my examples, multiple variables inside just one “Boolean()”
repeated what I said about “the exact same thing”, yes the computer would understand them the same way, we’re talking about Coding style, the convenient of upgrading the code to more complex logic.
Didnt have any reply to my “too many !!”. Made an execuse the seniors are using it, production code.. bla bla
Personal attack about English not my native language, beginner level
Keep it up, you’re doing real great. Dont worry too much, I’ve been through many years of js development, your comments and your capital letters wont make me a beginner.