No, I've deployed the service on a compute optimized EC2 - costs around $250 a month. Isn't ultrafast for faster compression but bigger sizes? I did it because the size does't difference is't relevant compared to the speed
My mistake. That's correct. Preset relevant to compression, not quality. Use EC2 is good choice.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
No, I've deployed the service on a compute optimized EC2 - costs around $250 a month.
Isn't ultrafast for faster compression but bigger sizes? I did it because the size does't difference is't relevant compared to the speed
My mistake. That's correct. Preset relevant to compression, not quality.
Use EC2 is good choice.